Goldberg Damien F, Orlich Claudio, Flowers Brian E, Singh Inder P, Tyson Sydney, Seibold Leonard K, ElMallah Mohammed K, Ison Elysia M, Harbin Med, Reynolds Heather, Kahook Malik Y
Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates, Torrance, CA, USA.
Clinica 20/20, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 16;18:2917-2928. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S481945. eCollection 2024.
To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.
Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.
Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.
To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.
报告威尼斯研究的中期结果,这是一项多中心、随机、对照试验(RCT),比较STREAMLINE手术系统(STREAMLINE)房角成形术与iStent inject W(iStent W)植入术在接受白内障超声乳化术的轻至中度原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者中的效果。
本报告纳入了对前72只随机分组眼睛的安全性和有效性分析。在进行药物治疗前(筛查)和药物洗脱后(符合条件)的访视后,每位受试者的一只眼睛在接受无并发症的白内障超声乳化术后按1:1随机分配至STREAMLINE或iStent W组。术后在第1天、第1周、第1个月、第3个月和第6个月对受试者进行评估。在每次随访时评估眼压(IOP)测量值、降低眼压药物的使用数量以及不良事件(AE)。
72只眼睛被随机分组;35只接受了STREAMLINE房角成形术,37只植入了iStent W。70只眼睛完成了6个月的随访。STREAMLINE组冲洗后早晨基线平均眼压为24.86±3.05 mmHg,iStent W组为25.16±3.41 mmHg;STREAMLINE组眼睛6个月时平均眼压为16.52±3.63 mmHg,iStent W组眼睛为16.08±3.19 mmHg,两组之间均无统计学显著差异(p值分别为0.691和0.596)。在6个月时,STREAMLINE组(81.8%)比iStent W组(78.4%)有更多眼睛停用青光眼药物。在未使用药物的眼睛中,STREAMLINE组平均眼压从24.80±2.79 mmHg降至16.00±3.40 mmHg,iStent W组从24.60±3.18 mmHg降至15.80±2.21 mmHg(p = 0.752)。与药物洗脱前(筛查)相比,两组在每次随访时降低眼压药物的使用量均有所减少,在6个月时STREAMLINE组使用的药物数量在数值上少于iStent W组,分别为0.20±0.48和0.40±0.79(P = 0.384)。不良事件均为轻度且可自愈。
据我们所知,威尼斯试验是第一项涉及房角成形术的随机对照试验。这些中期研究结果表明,STREAMLINE房角成形术与iStent W植入术在联合白内障超声乳化术时,降低眼压和减少药物使用方面效果相当。