Suppr超能文献

一项比较原发性开角型青光眼的STREAMLINE房角成形术与小梁微旁路支架植入术的随机对照试验。

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing STREAMLINE Canaloplasty to Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent Implantation in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

作者信息

Goldberg Damien F, Orlich Claudio, Flowers Brian E, Singh Inder P, Tyson Sydney, Seibold Leonard K, ElMallah Mohammed K, Ison Elysia M, Harbin Med, Reynolds Heather, Kahook Malik Y

机构信息

Wolstan & Goldberg Eye Associates, Torrance, CA, USA.

Clinica 20/20, San Jose, Costa Rica.

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 16;18:2917-2928. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S481945. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To report interim results of the VENICE study, a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial (RCT) comparing STREAMLINE Surgical System (STREAMLINE) canaloplasty with iStent inject W (iStent W) implantation in patients with mild-to-moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) undergoing phacoemulsification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Safety and efficacy analyses involving the first 72 randomized eyes are included in this report. Following pre- (Screening) and post-medication washout (Eligibility) visits, one eye per subject was randomized 1:1 to STREAMLINE or iStent W after undergoing uncomplicated phacoemulsification. Subjects were evaluated postoperatively at Day 1, Week 1, Month 1, 3, and 6. Intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements, number of IOP-lowering medications, and adverse events (AEs) were assessed at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Seventy-two eyes were randomized; 35 underwent STREAMLINE canaloplasty and 37 were implanted with the iStent W. Seventy eyes completed their 6-month follow-up. Both the mean morning post-washout Baseline IOP between STREAMLINE 24.86±3.05 mmHg and iStent W 25.16±3.41 mmHg and the mean IOP at 6 months between STREAMLINE eyes 16.52±3.63 mmHg and iStent W eyes 16.08±3.19 mmHg were not statistically significantly different (p=0.691 and 0.596, respectively). At 6 months, more eyes were on zero glaucoma medications in the STREAMLINE group (81.8%) compared to the iStent W group (78.4%). In medication-free eyes, the mean IOP was reduced from 24.80±2.79 mmHg to 16.00±3.40 mmHg and 24.60±3.18 mmHg to 15.80±2.21 mmHg in the STREAMLINE and iStent W groups, respectively (p=0.752). Both groups showed reduction in IOP-lowering medications at every visit, compared to pre-washout (Screening), with STREAMLINE resulting in numerically fewer medications 0.20±0.48 compared to iStent W 0.40±0.79 at 6 months (P=0.384). AEs were mild and self-limited.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, the VENICE trial is the first RCT involving canaloplasty. These interim findings demonstrated comparable IOP and medication reduction between STREAMLINE canaloplasty and iStent W implantation, when combined with phacoemulsification.

摘要

目的

报告威尼斯研究的中期结果,这是一项多中心、随机、对照试验(RCT),比较STREAMLINE手术系统(STREAMLINE)房角成形术与iStent inject W(iStent W)植入术在接受白内障超声乳化术的轻至中度原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者中的效果。

患者和方法

本报告纳入了对前72只随机分组眼睛的安全性和有效性分析。在进行药物治疗前(筛查)和药物洗脱后(符合条件)的访视后,每位受试者的一只眼睛在接受无并发症的白内障超声乳化术后按1:1随机分配至STREAMLINE或iStent W组。术后在第1天、第1周、第1个月、第3个月和第6个月对受试者进行评估。在每次随访时评估眼压(IOP)测量值、降低眼压药物的使用数量以及不良事件(AE)。

结果

72只眼睛被随机分组;35只接受了STREAMLINE房角成形术,37只植入了iStent W。70只眼睛完成了6个月的随访。STREAMLINE组冲洗后早晨基线平均眼压为24.86±3.05 mmHg,iStent W组为25.16±3.41 mmHg;STREAMLINE组眼睛6个月时平均眼压为16.52±3.63 mmHg,iStent W组眼睛为16.08±3.19 mmHg,两组之间均无统计学显著差异(p值分别为0.691和0.596)。在6个月时,STREAMLINE组(81.8%)比iStent W组(78.4%)有更多眼睛停用青光眼药物。在未使用药物的眼睛中,STREAMLINE组平均眼压从24.80±2.79 mmHg降至16.00±3.40 mmHg,iStent W组从24.60±3.18 mmHg降至15.80±2.21 mmHg(p = 0.752)。与药物洗脱前(筛查)相比,两组在每次随访时降低眼压药物的使用量均有所减少,在6个月时STREAMLINE组使用的药物数量在数值上少于iStent W组,分别为0.20±0.48和0.40±0.79(P = 0.384)。不良事件均为轻度且可自愈。

结论

据我们所知,威尼斯试验是第一项涉及房角成形术的随机对照试验。这些中期研究结果表明,STREAMLINE房角成形术与iStent W植入术在联合白内障超声乳化术时,降低眼压和减少药物使用方面效果相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15ad/11491083/645ffc45b262/OPTH-18-2917-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验