Yu Yilin, Wu Haixia, Qiu Jianjian, Hong Liang, Wu Shiji, Shao Lingdong, Lin Cheng, Wang Zhiping, Wu Junxin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024 Oct 17;16:17588359241290129. doi: 10.1177/17588359241290129. eCollection 2024.
Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents significant treatment challenges, particularly as patient age may influence disease progression and treatment response. Understanding the differences in progression patterns and treatment outcomes between older patient (OP) and non-older patient (NOP) is essential for tailoring effective management strategies.
We aimed to explore the differences of progression pattern, postoperative treatment, and survival outcome between OP and NOP groups in LARC.
DESIGN/METHODS: The random survival forest model was used to determine the probability of time-to-event occurrence every 3 months. Patients in the NOP and OP group were both categorized into three risk groups based on progression-free survival nomogram scores. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to verify our findings.
Our results revealed that Groups 1, 2, and 3 experienced peaks in progression within the first 24 months in NOP group. As for OP group, Group 4 reached a progression peak at the 18th month, Group 5 at the 12th month, and Group 6 at the 9th month. In NOP group, high-risk patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had significantly improved overall survival compared to those who did not. Additionally, postoperative chemotherapy did not significantly improve prognosis for patients in low-, moderate-, or high-risk groups of OP group. Finally, the validation results of IPTW analysis and SEER database showed compliance with our findings.
For NOP group, we recommended close follow-up during the first 2 years. As for OP group, it was suggested to conduct close follow-up at the 18th, 12th, and 9th month for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy can provide survival benefits for patients in high-risk group of NOP group. However, OP group patients should be informed that the potential benefits of postoperative chemotherapy may be minimal.
局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)带来了重大的治疗挑战,尤其是患者年龄可能会影响疾病进展和治疗反应。了解老年患者(OP)和非老年患者(NOP)之间进展模式和治疗结果的差异对于制定有效的管理策略至关重要。
我们旨在探讨LARC中OP组和NOP组在进展模式、术后治疗和生存结果方面的差异。
设计/方法:使用随机生存森林模型每3个月确定事件发生时间的概率。根据无进展生存列线图评分,将NOP组和OP组的患者均分为三个风险组。我们采用治疗权重逆概率(IPTW)分析和监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库来验证我们的研究结果。
我们的结果显示,NOP组的第1、2和3组在最初24个月内进展达到峰值。至于OP组,第4组在第18个月达到进展峰值,第5组在第12个月,第6组在第9个月。在NOP组中,接受术后化疗的高危患者与未接受术后化疗的患者相比,总生存期有显著改善。此外,术后化疗对OP组低、中、高危组患者的预后没有显著改善。最后,IPTW分析和SEER数据库的验证结果与我们的研究结果一致。
对于NOP组,我们建议在最初2年内密切随访。至于OP组,建议分别在第18、12和9个月对低、中、高危组进行密切随访。此外,术后化疗可为NOP组高危患者提供生存益处。然而,应告知OP组患者术后化疗的潜在益处可能很小。