J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Oct 1;112(4):364-371. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1812. Epub 2024 Oct 7.
Students regularly state a strong preference for increased library operational hours to accommodate learning needs. While many academic libraries provide extended hours, academic health sciences libraries appear to adopt such models less frequently. This is not due to lower levels of student demand for extended hours.
In response to student preferences for increased hours, our institution shifted its budget to provide an additional 10 weekend hours (Friday-Sunday). This study is a post-hoc assessment of temporal changes in physical library use over weekend days pre- and post-implementation of extended hours. This study used (non-exam) weekend physical library usage data one year before and after implementing extended hours (January 2018-January 2020). We ran descriptive statistics to assess the hourly use pattern changes in physical library usage.
For the regular academic year, students arrived earlier and stayed later, with less severe hourly peaks in opening and closing times physical use patterns seen in the pre-implementation period. Overall, we saw increases in all three areas of physical usage data studied. The data provides evidence of the true need for extended hours among users, along with hourly patterns reflecting a better match of hours with patron study patterns.
学生经常表示强烈希望增加图书馆的开放时间,以满足学习需求。虽然许多学术图书馆提供延长开放时间,但学术健康科学图书馆似乎不太频繁地采用这种模式。这并不是因为学生对延长开放时间的需求较低。
为了满足学生对延长开放时间的需求,我们的机构调整了预算,每周增加 10 个周末开放时间(周五至周日)。本研究是对延长开放时间实施前后周末实体图书馆使用时间的变化进行的事后评估。本研究使用了延长开放时间实施前后一年的(非考试)周末实体图书馆使用数据(2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 1 月)。我们进行了描述性统计,以评估实体图书馆使用量的小时使用模式变化。
在常规学年期间,学生提前到达并延迟离开,开放和关闭时间的小时峰值减少,实体使用模式与实施前相比有所改善。总体而言,我们看到三个方面的实体使用数据都有所增加。这些数据为用户对延长开放时间的真正需求提供了证据,同时反映了开放时间与学生学习模式更好匹配的小时模式。