• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于酰胺质子转移成像和扩散加权成像预测鼻咽癌新辅助化疗早期疗效的价值

The value of predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy early efficacy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on amide proton transfer imaging and diffusion weighted imaging.

作者信息

Zhang Yulin, Li Guomin, Chen Jinyan, Jiang Meien, Gao Yunyu, Li Kunsong, Wen Hua, Yan Jianhao

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, the Affiliated Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7330-7340. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-188. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

DOI:10.21037/qims-24-188
PMID:39429559
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11485347/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early detection of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who are not sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can guard against overtreatment. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of amide proton transfer (APT) imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in predicting the early response to NAC in patients with NPC.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled fifty patients with biopsy-confirmed NPC from September 2021 to May 2023. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including APT and DWI, was performed before NAC. After NAC, patients were divided into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) groups based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours Version 1.1. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for statistical analysis. The differences in APT and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values among the different efficacy groups were compared, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn for statistically significant parameters, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (mean age: 47±14 years; 42 males and 8 females) were included in the final analysis (11 were in the CR group, 30 in the PR group, 9 in the SD group, and 0 in the PD group). The ADC values showed no significant differences among the different treatment response groups. The SD group showed significantly lower APT (P=0.025), APT (P=0.025) and APT (P=0.001) values than the CR and PR groups. Setting APT =3.10% as the cut-off value, optimal diagnostic performance (AUC: 0.831; sensitivity: 0.778; specificity: 0.878) was obtained in predicting the SD group.

CONCLUSIONS

APT imaging can predict the early tumour response to NAC in patients with NPC. APT imaging may be superior to DWI in predicting tumour response.

摘要

背景

早期发现对新辅助化疗(NAC)不敏感的鼻咽癌(NPC)患者可避免过度治疗。本研究旨在评估酰胺质子转移(APT)成像和扩散加权成像(DWI)在预测NPC患者对NAC早期反应中的有效性。

方法

本前瞻性研究纳入了2021年9月至2023年5月间50例经活检确诊的NPC患者。在NAC前进行包括APT和DWI在内的磁共振成像(MRI)检查。NAC后,根据实体瘤疗效评价标准第1.1版将患者分为完全缓解(CR)、部分缓解(PR)、疾病稳定(SD)和疾病进展(PD)组。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验进行统计分析。比较不同疗效组间APT和表观扩散系数(ADC)值的差异,对有统计学意义的参数绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算曲线下面积(AUC)。

结果

最终纳入50例患者(平均年龄:47±14岁;男性42例,女性8例)进行分析(CR组11例,PR组30例,SD组9例,PD组0例)。不同治疗反应组间ADC值无显著差异。SD组的APT值(P=0.025)、APT值(P=0.025)和APT值(P=0.001)显著低于CR组和PR组。将APT=3.10%作为临界值,在预测SD组时获得了最佳诊断性能(AUC:0.831;灵敏度:0.778;特异度:0.878)。

结论

APT成像可预测NPC患者肿瘤对NAC的早期反应。在预测肿瘤反应方面,APT成像可能优于DWI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/49783d15559f/qims-14-10-7330-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/67d8a63ec281/qims-14-10-7330-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/bfc056d464bf/qims-14-10-7330-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/a97141b1e082/qims-14-10-7330-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/81b29db983d7/qims-14-10-7330-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/49783d15559f/qims-14-10-7330-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/67d8a63ec281/qims-14-10-7330-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/bfc056d464bf/qims-14-10-7330-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/a97141b1e082/qims-14-10-7330-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/81b29db983d7/qims-14-10-7330-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d7a/11485347/49783d15559f/qims-14-10-7330-f5.jpg

相似文献

1
The value of predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy early efficacy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on amide proton transfer imaging and diffusion weighted imaging.基于酰胺质子转移成像和扩散加权成像预测鼻咽癌新辅助化疗早期疗效的价值
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024 Oct 1;14(10):7330-7340. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-188. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
2
Amide proton transfer (APT) and magnetization transfer (MT) in predicting short-term therapeutic outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy: a feasibility study of three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.酰胺质子转移(APT)和磁化转移(MT)在预测鼻咽癌放化疗后短期疗效中的作用:三维化学交换饱和传递(CEST)MRI 的可行性研究。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Sep 1;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00602-6.
3
Evaluation of the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer using diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.使用扩散加权成像和动态对比增强磁共振成像评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗的疗效。
Neoplasma. 2017;64(3):430-436. doi: 10.4149/neo_2017_314.
4
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for early response assessment of chemoradiotherapy in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.扩散加权磁共振成像用于鼻咽癌患者放化疗早期疗效评估
Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Jul;32(6):630-7. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.02.009. Epub 2014 Feb 11.
5
Diffusion kurtosis imaging predicts neoadjuvant chemotherapy responses within 4 days in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.扩散峰度成像可在4天内预测晚期鼻咽癌患者的新辅助化疗反应。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Nov;42(5):1354-61. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24910. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
6
Added-value of 3D amide proton transfer MRI in assessing prognostic factors of cervical cancer: a comparative study with multiple model diffusion-weighted imaging.3D酰胺质子转移磁共振成像在评估宫颈癌预后因素中的附加值:与多模型扩散加权成像的对比研究
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Dec 1;13(12):8157-8172. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-324. Epub 2023 Nov 3.
7
Grading of Glioma: combined diagnostic value of amide proton transfer weighted, arterial spin labeling and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging.胶质瘤分级:酰胺质子转移加权成像、动脉自旋标记和扩散加权磁共振成像的联合诊断价值
BMC Med Imaging. 2020 May 14;20(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12880-020-00450-x.
8
Pre-treatment amide proton transfer imaging predicts treatment outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.预处理酰胺质子转移成像可预测鼻咽癌的治疗效果。
Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6339-6347. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06985-5. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
9
Baseline Amide Proton Transfer Imaging at 3T Fails to Predict Early Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.3T场强下的基线酰胺质子转移成像无法预测鼻咽癌诱导化疗的早期反应。
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 8;12:822756. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.822756. eCollection 2022.
10
The Value of Amide Proton Transfer MRI in the Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Urinary Bladder Lesions: Comparison With Diffusion-Weighted Imaging.酰胺质子转移 MRI 在良恶性膀胱病变诊断中的价值:与弥散加权成像比较。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Sep;60(3):1124-1133. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29199. Epub 2024 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Prediction of induction chemotherapy response in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma based on three pretreatment non-Gaussian diffusion MRI models.基于三种治疗前非高斯扩散磁共振成像模型预测局部晚期鼻咽癌诱导化疗反应
BMC Med Imaging. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01752-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Amide proton transfer (APT) and magnetization transfer (MT) in predicting short-term therapeutic outcome in nasopharyngeal carcinoma after chemoradiotherapy: a feasibility study of three-dimensional chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI.酰胺质子转移(APT)和磁化转移(MT)在预测鼻咽癌放化疗后短期疗效中的作用:三维化学交换饱和传递(CEST)MRI 的可行性研究。
Cancer Imaging. 2023 Sep 1;23(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40644-023-00602-6.
2
Comparison and combination of amide proton transfer magnetic resonance imaging and the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating the grades of prostate cancer.酰胺质子转移磁共振成像与表观扩散系数在鉴别前列腺癌分级中的比较与联合应用
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Feb 1;13(2):812-824. doi: 10.21037/qims-22-721. Epub 2022 Dec 8.
3
Predicting treatment response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix using amide proton transfer imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging.采用酰胺质子转移成像和体素内不相干运动成像预测宫颈鳞状细胞癌同步放化疗的治疗反应。
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022 Dec;103(12):618-624. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for predicting neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy response in patients with rectal cancer.表观扩散系数直方图分析预测直肠癌新辅助放化疗反应。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Sep;28(5):403-409. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.201112.
5
Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors.3T 临床 APT 加权成像方法的回顾与共识建议:在脑肿瘤中的应用。
Magn Reson Med. 2022 Aug;88(2):546-574. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29241. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
6
Molecular Imaging of Brain Tumors and Drug Delivery Using CEST MRI: Promises and Challenges.利用化学交换饱和转移磁共振成像(CEST MRI)对脑肿瘤进行分子成像及药物递送:前景与挑战
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 20;14(2):451. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020451.
7
Baseline Amide Proton Transfer Imaging at 3T Fails to Predict Early Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.3T场强下的基线酰胺质子转移成像无法预测鼻咽癌诱导化疗的早期反应。
Front Oncol. 2022 Feb 8;12:822756. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.822756. eCollection 2022.
8
Reversing chemorefraction in colorectal cancer cells by controlling mucin secretion.通过控制黏蛋白分泌逆转结直肠癌细胞的化学趋向性。
Elife. 2022 Feb 8;11:e73926. doi: 10.7554/eLife.73926.
9
Comparison of the pre-treatment functional MRI metrics' efficacy in predicting Locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma response to induction chemotherapy.比较预处理功能磁共振成像指标预测局部晚期鼻咽癌对诱导化疗反应的疗效。
Cancer Imaging. 2021 Nov 10;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s40644-021-00428-0.
10
Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in predicting the treatment response of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.弥散加权磁共振成像在预测鼻咽癌治疗反应中的应用。
Neuroradiol J. 2022 Aug;35(4):477-485. doi: 10.1177/19714009211055191. Epub 2021 Nov 3.