Enhanced detection of skull-base bone invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the supplementary diagnostic value of fluorine-sodium fluoride (F-NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) combined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

BACKGROUND

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) originates in the nasopharyngeal mucosa, the lateral wall of the nasopharynx. A significant challenge in NPC management is skull-base bone invasion (SBBI), which affects prognosis and treatment planning. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the primary diagnostic tool for SBBI in NPC patients; however, the detection of SBBI can be challenging due to skull-base complexity and overlapping MRI signals. fluorine-sodium fluoride (F-NaF) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is an emerging imaging technique that has shown promise in detecting osseous lesions. This cohort study aimed to assess the supplementary diagnostic value of F-NaF PET/CT in detecting SBBI in NPC patients compared to that of MRI alone.

METHODS

Imaging data were retrospectively collected from F-NaF PET/CT and head-and-neck MRI examinations conducted within a 7-day period. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of F-NaF PET/CT, MRI, and the combination of both modalities in detecting SBBI were individually assessed. Both lesion- and patient-based analyses were employed for the comparison. Cochran's Q test was used to compare the accuracy of these methods, while the Bonferroni-corrected McNemar test was used for the pairwise comparisons. The data analysis was performed using the R software package, and a significance level of P0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 164 patients were enrolled in the study. Using F-NaF PET/CT, MRI, and the combined modality of F-NaF PET/CT with MRI, 97, 84, and 94 cases of SBBI were diagnosed, respectively. At the patient level, the diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) was as follows: F-NaF PET/CT had 100% sensitivity, 93.1% specificity, and 97.0% accuracy; MRI had 90.2% sensitivity, 98.6% specificity, and 93.9% accuracy; and the combination of F-NaF PET/CT and MRI had 100% sensitivity, 97.2% specificity, and 98.8% accuracy. The accuracy rate of F-NaF PET/CT combined with MRI were significantly higher than that of MRI alone (P0.034). A total of 284, 243, and 276 SBBI lesions were diagnosed using F-NaF PET/CT, MRI, and F-NaF PET/CT combined with MRI, respectively. The diagnostic efficacy (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) at the lesion level was as follows: F-NaF PET/CT had 99.6% sensitivity, 75.9% specificity, and 95.4% accuracy; MRI had 88.2% sensitivity, 93.1% specificity, and 89.1% accuracy; and the combination of F-NaF PET/CT with MRI had 100% sensitivity, 91.4% specificity, and 98.5% accuracy. The combination of F-NaF PET/CT with MRI significantly improved the accuracy rate compared to that of MRI alone, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined use of F-NaF PET/CT and MRI significantly enhanced the diagnosis of SBBI in NPC patients, and the combined method had improved diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy than MRI alone.