Wenzel Piper A, Van Meeteren Steven L, Pagedar Nitin A, Buchakjian Marisa R
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City Iowa USA.
University of Iowa Holden Comprehensive Cancer Center Iowa City Iowa USA.
OTO Open. 2024 Oct 17;8(4):e70032. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70032. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
Identify correlations between lymph node characteristics and extranodal extension (ENE).
Retrospective chart review.
Tertiary care center.
Patients who underwent neck dissection for oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma from 2004 to 2018 were included, with a starting sample of 496. The primary outcome was ENE in at least 1 lymph node. Additional variables included number of dissected nodes, positive nodes by level, positive lymph node ratio (LNR), and diameter of metastatic deposit and ENE focus. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine correlations between included variables and ENE.
Of the 496 patients, 233 had nodal metastasis (47.0%). 13,814 nodes were removed, with 714 (5.2%) containing metastasis. Of the positive nodes, 28.0% had ENE, 47.2% did not have ENE, and 24.8% were unknown. The mean ENE diameter was 5.1 mm (SD, 9.9). On univariate logistic regression analysis, ipsilateral neck LNR per 0.1 unit increase (odds ratio [OR] 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.32, = .02), metastatic deposit size per 1 mm increase (OR 1.06, CI 1.04-1.08, < .0001), and clinical T- ( = .02) and N-class ( = .0003) significantly correlated with ENE. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, size of metastatic deposit (OR 1.06, CI 1.03-1.08, < .0001) remained significantly correlated with ENE.
Controlling for confounding variables, size of metastatic deposit was an independent predictor of ENE, suggesting that as the metastatic deposit size increases, the odds of extension through the capsule also increases. This may be due to capsule thinning as the deposit grows or could represent the invasive nature of aggressive disease.
确定淋巴结特征与结外扩展(ENE)之间的相关性。
回顾性病历审查。
三级医疗中心。
纳入2004年至2018年因口腔鳞状细胞癌接受颈部清扫术的患者,初始样本量为496例。主要结局是至少1个淋巴结出现ENE。其他变量包括清扫淋巴结数量、按水平划分的阳性淋巴结、阳性淋巴结比率(LNR)、转移灶直径和ENE病灶。进行单因素和多因素二元逻辑回归分析,以确定纳入变量与ENE之间的相关性。
496例患者中,233例有淋巴结转移(47.0%)。共切除13814个淋巴结,其中714个(5.2%)有转移。在阳性淋巴结中,28.0%有ENE,47.2%无ENE,24.8%情况不明。ENE的平均直径为5.1毫米(标准差,9.9)。单因素逻辑回归分析显示,同侧颈部LNR每增加0.1个单位(比值比[OR]1.16,95%置信区间[CI]1.02 - 1.32,P = 0.02)、转移灶大小每增加1毫米(OR 1.06,CI 1.04 - 1.08,P < 0.0001)以及临床T分期(P = 0.02)和N分期(P = 0.0003)与ENE显著相关。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,转移灶大小(OR 1.06,CI 1.03 - 1.08,P < 0.0001)仍与ENE显著相关。
在控制混杂变量的情况下,转移灶大小是ENE的独立预测因素,这表明随着转移灶大小增加,穿过包膜扩展的几率也增加。这可能是由于随着病灶增大包膜变薄,或者可能代表侵袭性疾病的侵袭性本质。