Harris J R, Hellman S
Cancer. 1986 Mar 1;57(5):925-8. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860301)57:5<925::aid-cncr2820570508>3.0.co;2-l.
The proper analysis of survival curves of patients treated for cancer is critical to advances in clinical investigation. In this article, the presentation of such survival curves is reviewed and the various possible effects of treatment on these curves are discussed. The results of breast cancer treatment are used as examples. It is argued that the use of a semilogarithmic presentation is preferred in displaying the long-term force of mortality of the disease. In many human cancers, such as carcinoma of the breast, the demonstration of a "cured" subgroup requires follow-up of greater than 10 years and cannot be inferred from data evaluated earlier. Beneficial effects noted on the initial portion of the survival curve are not necessarily associated with an improvement in the likelihood of long-term survival, but are rather a reflection of delay or reduction on the initial force of mortality. Since both hosts and tumors are heterogeneous, it is also possible that there are different effects on various subgroups, making curve interpretation complex. In some cases, an early detrimental effect may obscure a benefit in the long-term outcome. These considerations emphasize that effects seen on the early portion of survival curves may not only be premature, but may also be misleading.
对癌症患者生存曲线进行恰当分析对于临床研究的进展至关重要。在本文中,我们回顾了此类生存曲线的呈现方式,并讨论了治疗对这些曲线可能产生的各种影响。以乳腺癌治疗结果为例进行阐述。有人认为,在展示疾病的长期死亡率强度时,采用半对数呈现方式更为可取。在许多人类癌症中,如乳腺癌,要证明存在一个“治愈”亚组需要超过10年的随访,且无法从早期评估的数据中推断出来。在生存曲线起始部分观察到的有益效果不一定与长期生存可能性的改善相关,而更可能是初始死亡率强度延迟或降低的反映。由于宿主和肿瘤都是异质性的,对不同亚组也可能存在不同影响,这使得曲线解读变得复杂。在某些情况下,早期的有害影响可能会掩盖长期结果中的益处。这些考量强调,在生存曲线早期观察到的效果不仅可能为时过早,还可能具有误导性。