Sølling J, Hansen H E
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1979;13(3):305-7. doi: 10.3109/00365597909179542.
A new, low-price, parallel-flow, plate dialyser--the LPP dialyser--has been compared with a hollow fibre dialyser--the C-DAK dialyser. At dialysate flows of 510-680 ml/min and blood flows 140-200 ml/min the clearances of urea, creatinine and uric acid were 30-40 ml/min greater in the C-DAK dialyser. In the patients the mean creatinine at end of dialysis increased 1.7 mg% during treatment with the LPP dialyser. The ultrafiltration rate was found to be greater in the LPP dialyser than in the C-DAK dialyser. No membrane ruptures were observed in 200 LPP dialysers compared to 2 of 1200 C-DAK dialysers. The mean residual blood volume was 6.4 ml in the LPP dialyser + blood lines and 5.3 ml in the C-DAK dialyser + blood lines. The difference is insignificant. The LPP dialyser may be useful when dialysis is carried out frequency and when overhydration is a major problem.
一种新型低价的平行流平板透析器——LPP透析器,已与中空纤维透析器——C-DAK透析器进行了比较。在透析液流量为510 - 680毫升/分钟且血液流量为140 - 200毫升/分钟时,C-DAK透析器对尿素、肌酐和尿酸的清除率比LPP透析器高30 - 40毫升/分钟。在患者中,使用LPP透析器治疗期间,透析结束时的平均肌酐水平增加了1.7毫克%。发现LPP透析器的超滤率高于C-DAK透析器。在200个LPP透析器中未观察到膜破裂,而在1200个C-DAK透析器中有2个出现膜破裂。LPP透析器 + 血路的平均残余血量为6.4毫升,C-DAK透析器 + 血路的平均残余血量为5.3毫升。差异不显著。当频繁进行透析且水过多是主要问题时,LPP透析器可能会有用。