Büringer Karsten, Schempf Ulrike, Fusco Stefano, Wichmann Dörte, Stüker Dietmar, Götz Martin, Malek Nisar P, Werner Christoph R
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Geriatrics and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Otfried-Müller-Str. 10, Tübingen D-72076, Germany.
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Gastrointestinal Oncology, Geriatrics and Infectious diseases, University Hospital Tübingen, Tubingen, Germany.
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 16;17:17562848241288111. doi: 10.1177/17562848241288111. eCollection 2024.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is the standard endoscopic procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the pancreas and bile ducts. Cholangioscopy provides direct visualization of the bile ducts. It offers the possibility of more detailed diagnostic and therapeutic indications. Today, cholangioscopy is often performed as a single-operator (SOC) procedure.
We were interested in the clinical efficacy of our SOC procedure in comparison with published studies, and performed this retrospective data analysis of all our consecutive patients from 2016 to 2022 to analyze the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SOC.
A retrospective single-center analysis of patients undergoing SOC at a tertiary center from 2016 to 2022 ( = 196) was performed. Demographic data, indication for SOC, exam-specific data, efficacy, and complications were included. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures were calculated.
The most common indications for SOC were indeterminate biliary strictures ( = 117; 60%), treatment of biliary stones ( = 45; 23%), and other indications ( = 34; 17%), for example, foreign body removal or intraoperative SOC. In 97% of the SOC ( = 191), the procedure was technically successful. The diagnostic or therapeutic goal was achieved in 91% of SOC ( = 173). In the subgroup where the SOC result was confirmed by subsequent surgery ( = 93), sensitivity was 86%, specificity 99%, and SOC treatment of stones was successful in 89%. Complications occurred in (20%; = 37). The majority of these patients ( = 18; 10%) had minor bleeding requiring no intervention.
SOC is an effective and safe procedure that should be the standard of care when primary diagnostic and/or therapeutic ERCP has failed. The sensitivity and specificity for determining the dignity of biliary strictures and the efficacy for the treatment of difficult-to-treat stones are reproducibly very high.
内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是诊断和治疗胰腺及胆管疾病的标准内镜检查方法。胆管镜检查可直接观察胆管。它提供了更详细的诊断和治疗指征的可能性。如今,胆管镜检查常作为单人操作(SOC)程序进行。
我们感兴趣的是将我们的SOC程序的临床疗效与已发表的研究进行比较,并对2016年至2022年所有连续患者进行这项回顾性数据分析,以分析SOC的可行性、安全性和疗效。
对2016年至2022年在三级中心接受SOC的患者(n = 196)进行回顾性单中心分析。纳入人口统计学数据、SOC指征、特定检查数据、疗效和并发症。计算诊断不确定胆管狭窄的敏感性和特异性。
SOC最常见的指征是不确定胆管狭窄(n = 117;60%)、胆管结石治疗(n = 45;23%)和其他指征(n = 34;17%),例如异物取出或术中SOC。在97%的SOC(n = 191)中,该程序在技术上是成功的。91%的SOC(n = 173)实现了诊断或治疗目标。在SOC结果通过后续手术得到证实的亚组(n = 93)中,敏感性为86%,特异性为99%,结石的SOC治疗成功率为89%。并发症发生率为20%(n = 37)。这些患者中的大多数(n = 18;10%)有轻微出血,无需干预。
SOC是一种有效且安全的程序,当原发性诊断和/或治疗性ERCP失败时,应作为护理标准。确定胆管狭窄性质的敏感性和特异性以及治疗难治性结石的疗效可重复性地非常高。