Arrhythmia Center, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Department of International Medical Service, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2024 Nov;29(6):e70026. doi: 10.1111/anec.70026.
The calculation of left ventricular mass varies in different studies, and reference values of the voltage-to-mass ratio for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis (CA) are lacking. This study aimed to determine the value of the voltage-to-mass ratio in diagnosing CA and provide an optimal cut-off value for different calculation methods.
We reviewed the electrocardiograms and echocardiograms of 213 consecutive biopsy-proven CA patients, 236 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients, 100 hypertensive heart disease patients, and 181 healthy controls. Left ventricular mass was calculated using linear and cross-sectional area (CSA) methods. The voltage-to-mass ratios were compared between the CA group and other groups. The voltage-to-mass ratio obtained was used to build multivariate logistic regression models that predicted the log odds of developing CA.
The CA group had a significantly lower voltage-to-mass ratio than the HCM, hypertensive heart disease, and healthy control groups. The voltage-to-mass ratio was an independent factor significantly associated with the CA diagnosis after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Linear and CSA methods yielded areas under the ROC curve of 0.86 and 0.90, respectively. Using the CSA method, the optimal cut-off was 16.42 mV/mm/m, with 89.0% sensitivity and 80.8% specificity.
The voltage-to-mass ratio could differentiate patients with CA, HCM, and hypertensive heart disease from healthy controls, potentially providing an accurate and non-invasive alternative to current expensive and invasive diagnostic techniques.
不同研究中左心室质量的计算方法各不相同,且用于诊断心脏淀粉样变性(CA)的电压-质量比参考值也尚未确定。本研究旨在确定电压-质量比在诊断 CA 中的价值,并为不同计算方法提供最佳截断值。
我们回顾了 213 例经活检证实的 CA 患者、236 例肥厚型心肌病(HCM)患者、100 例高血压性心脏病患者和 181 例健康对照者的心电图和超声心动图。使用线性和横截面面积(CSA)方法计算左心室质量。比较 CA 组与其他组之间的电压-质量比。使用获得的电压-质量比构建多变量逻辑回归模型,预测发生 CA 的对数可能性。
CA 组的电压-质量比明显低于 HCM、高血压性心脏病和健康对照组。在校正基线特征后,电压-质量比是与 CA 诊断显著相关的独立因素。线性和 CSA 方法的 ROC 曲线下面积分别为 0.86 和 0.90。使用 CSA 方法,最佳截断值为 16.42mV/mm/m,具有 89.0%的敏感性和 80.8%的特异性。
电压-质量比可区分 CA、HCM 和高血压性心脏病患者与健康对照者,可能为目前昂贵且有创的诊断技术提供一种准确且无创的替代方法。