Schmitt R, Staufenbiel R
Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vet Clin Pathol. 2024 Dec;53(4):409-419. doi: 10.1111/vcp.13386. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
Haptoglobin (Hp) is an emerging diagnostic marker in cattle, and knowledge of suitable sample types and measurement methods is important.
The aims of this study were to compare the results of a colorimetric assay (CA) and an ELISA for bovine Hp using serum, EDTA plasma, and lithium-heparinized (LH) plasma, respectively, and to assess the diagnostic potential for puerperal metritis.
In experiment 1, Hp was measured in pooled aliquots of serum (n = 10), EDTA plasma (n = 10), and LH plasma (n = 10) of 100 healthy fresh lactating dairy cows from 10 farms using both the CA and the ELISA. In experiment 2, five healthy and five cows with acute puerperal metritis were sampled, and Hp was determined using both assays for all three sample types. In experiment 3, aliquots of serum and LH plasma from cows in different lactation stages were transferred into plain, EDTA-coated, and LH-coated tubes and mixed before colorimetric analyses. Distilled water was also placed into each tube type and treated similarly.
Plasma samples measured with the CA showed on average 2.3 (EDTA) and 2.5 (LH) times higher Hp concentrations compared with serum, whereas no differences were seen with the ELISA results between sample types. Based on a clinical cut-off value, both methods differentiated sick from healthy cows. Haptoglobin measurements with the ELISA were less precise compared with CA measurements due to high dilutions. No influence of the anticoagulants on the CA was observed.
Due to measurement discrepancies between serum and plasma, CAs for bovine Hp based on peroxidase activity should be performed with serum, or specific reference ranges for plasma samples should be established. In this study, CA results obtained with LH plasma were more precise than results obtained with EDTA plasma. Both the CA and the ELISA are suitable diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of puerperal metritis, but CA measurements were more precise in this study.
触珠蛋白(Hp)是牛中一种新兴的诊断标志物,了解合适的样本类型和测量方法很重要。
本研究的目的是分别比较使用血清、乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)血浆和肝素锂(LH)血浆的比色法(CA)和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测牛Hp的结果,并评估其对产后子宫内膜炎的诊断潜力。
在实验1中,使用CA和ELISA对来自10个农场的100头健康初产泌乳奶牛的血清(n = 10)、EDTA血浆(n = 10)和LH血浆(n = 10)的混合等分试样进行Hp测量。在实验2中,对5头健康奶牛和5头患有急性产后子宫内膜炎的奶牛进行采样,并使用这两种检测方法对所有三种样本类型进行Hp测定。在实验3中,将不同泌乳阶段奶牛的血清和LH血浆等分试样转移到普通管、EDTA包被管和LH包被管中,在比色分析前进行混合。每种管型中也加入蒸馏水并进行类似处理。
与血清相比,用CA测量的血浆样本中Hp浓度平均高出2.3倍(EDTA)和2.5倍(LH),而样本类型之间的ELISA结果没有差异。基于临床临界值,两种方法都能区分患病奶牛和健康奶牛。由于稀释度高,与CA测量相比,ELISA测量Hp的精度较低。未观察到抗凝剂对CA有影响。
由于血清和血浆之间的测量差异,基于过氧化物酶活性的牛Hp比色法应使用血清进行,或者应为血浆样本建立特定的参考范围。在本研究中,用LH血浆获得的CA结果比用EDTA血浆获得的结果更精确。CA和ELISA都是诊断产后子宫内膜炎的合适诊断工具,但在本研究中CA测量更精确。