Zeitouni Michel, Dorvillius Elodie, Sulman David, Procopi Niki, Beaupré Frederic, Devos Perrine, Barthélémy Olivier, Rouanet Stéphanie, Ferrante Arnaud, Chommeloux Juliette, Hekimian Guillaume, Kerneis Mathieu, Silvain Johanne, Montalescot Gilles
ACTION Study Group, INSERM UMRS 1166, Institut de Cardiologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière (Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris), Paris-Sorbonne Université, 47-83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
Statistician Unit, StatEthic, ACTION Study group, Levallois-Perret, France.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2025 Mar;25(2):249-258. doi: 10.1007/s40256-024-00683-z. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
This study examines the effects of levosimendan in patients refractory to dobutamine weaning.
This retrospective study included patients with cardiogenic shock refractory to dobutamine weaning failure admitted between 2010 and 2022. Patients treated with another type of dobutamine alone were compared with those treated with levosimendan in combination with dobutamine. Successful inotrope withdrawal was defined as survival without catecholamine support, transplant, or definitive ventricular assist device at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality at 30 and 90 days.
Among 349 patients with cardiogenic shock and failure to withdraw from dobutamine, levosimendan was administered in combination with dobutamine in 114 patients, and another type of dobutamine alone was administered in 235 patients. At 30 days, successful inotrope withdrawal occurred in 46 (43.4%) patients taking levosimendan plus dobutamine versus 24 (10.5%) patients in the dobutamine-only group (weighted odds ratio [OR] 4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-9.38; p < 0.001), with similar results at 90 days (weighted OR 6.16, 95% CI 3.22-11.78; p < 0.001). Levosimendan + dobutamine was associated with lower 30-day mortality (weighted OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.84; p = 0.01), with no difference at 90 days (weighted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.39-1.14; p = 0.14).
Adding levosimendan to dobutamine may improve inotrope withdrawal success and reduce 30-day mortality in patients with initial weaning failure.
本研究探讨左西孟旦对多巴酚丁胺撤机困难患者的影响。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2010年至2022年间因多巴酚丁胺撤机失败而发生心源性休克的患者。将单独使用另一种类型多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者与联合使用左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺治疗的患者进行比较。成功撤停血管活性药物的定义为在30天时无需儿茶酚胺支持、移植或确定性心室辅助装置而存活。次要结局包括30天和90天的全因死亡率。
在349例心源性休克且多巴酚丁胺撤机失败的患者中,114例患者联合使用左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺,235例患者单独使用另一种类型的多巴酚丁胺。在30天时,联合使用左西孟旦和多巴酚丁胺的患者中有46例(43.4%)成功撤停血管活性药物,而仅使用多巴酚丁胺组为24例(10.5%)(加权比值比[OR] 4.99,95%置信区间[CI] 2.65 - 9.38;p < 0.001),90天时结果相似(加权OR 6.16,95% CI 3.22 - 11.78;p < 0.001)。左西孟旦联合多巴酚丁胺与30天死亡率较低相关(加权OR 0.47,95% CI 0.26 - 0.84;p = 0.01),90天时无差异(加权OR 0.67,95% CI 0.39 - 1.14;p = 0.14)。
在多巴酚丁胺基础上加用左西孟旦可能提高撤停血管活性药物的成功率,并降低初始撤机失败患者的30天死亡率。