Nglazi Mweete D, Ataguba John E
Implementation Science Centre for Advancing Practice and Training (IMPACT), University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Lusaka, Lusaka, Zambia.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Oct 21;4(10):e0003859. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003859. eCollection 2024.
The changing food environment shifts peoples' eating behaviour toward unhealthy food, including ultra-processed food (UPF), leading to detrimental health outcomes like obesity. This study examines changes in socioeconomic inequalities in food consumption spending between 2005/06 and 2010/11 in South African households with women of childbearing age (15 to 49) (WCBA). Data come from the 2005/06 and 2010/11 Income and Expenditure Surveys. The distribution of spending according to the NOVA food classification system groupings (unprocessed or minimally processed foods, processed culinary ingredients, processed and UPF products) was analysed using standard methodologies. Changes in spending inequalities between 2005/06 and 2010/11 were assessed using the concentration index (C), while the factors explaining the changes in spending inequalities were identified using the Oaxaca decomposition approach. The Kakwani index (K) was used to assess progressivity. Results show that average real spending on all food categories, including UPF, increased between 2005/06 and 2010/11. Socioeconomic inequality in UPF consumption spending decreased (C = 0.498 in 2005/06 and C = 0.432 in 2010/11), and spending on processed foods (C = 0.248 in 2005/06 and C = 0.209 in 2010/11). Socioeconomic status, race, and urban residence contributed to overall socioeconomic inequality and changes in UPF consumption inequality between 2005/06 and 2010/11. Spending on all food categories was regressive in 2005/06 (K = -0.173 for UPF and -0.425 for processed foods) and 2010/11 (K = -0.192 for UPF and -0.418 for processed foods) because such spending comprises a larger share of poorer household's income than their wealthier counterparts. The government should address these contributors to inequality to mitigate the risks associated with UPF consumption, especially among less affluent households.
不断变化的食物环境使人们的饮食行为转向不健康食品,包括超加工食品(UPF),导致肥胖等有害健康的后果。本研究考察了2005/06年至2010/11年间南非有育龄妇女(15至49岁)(WCBA)家庭在食品消费支出方面社会经济不平等的变化情况。数据来自2005/06年和2010/11年的收入与支出调查。根据NOVA食品分类系统分组(未加工或最低限度加工食品、加工烹饪配料、加工和超加工产品)对支出分布进行了标准方法分析。使用集中度指数(C)评估2005/06年至2010/11年间支出不平等的变化,同时使用奥瓦卡分解法确定解释支出不平等变化的因素。使用卡克瓦尼指数(K)评估累进性。结果表明,2005/06年至2010/11年间,包括超加工食品在内的所有食品类别的平均实际支出均有所增加。超加工食品消费支出的社会经济不平等有所下降(2005/06年C = 0.498,2010/11年C = 0.432),加工食品支出也有所下降(2005/06年C = 0.248,2010/11年C = 0.209)。社会经济地位、种族和城市居住情况导致了2005/06年至2010/11年间总体社会经济不平等以及超加工食品消费不平等的变化。2005/06年(超加工食品K = -0.173,加工食品K = -0.425)和2010/11年(超加工食品K = -0.192,加工食品K = -0.418)所有食品类别的支出都是累退的,因为这类支出在较贫困家庭收入中所占份额高于富裕家庭。政府应解决这些导致不平等的因素,以降低与超加工食品消费相关的风险,尤其是在较贫困家庭中。