Innovation, Implementation & Clinical Translation (IIMPACT) in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8715-8719. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02499-w. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) is a popular neuropsychological test that is complicated to score and interpret. In an attempt to make scoring of the WCST simpler, Berry (The Clinical Neuropsychologist 10, 117-121, 1996) developed a diagrammatic scoring procedure, particularly to aid scoring of perseverative responses. We identified key limitations of Berry's diagram, including its unnecessary ambiguity and complexity, use of terminology different from that used in the standardized WCST manual, and lack of distinction between perseverative errors and perseverative responses. Our new diagrammatic scoring procedure scores each response one-by-one; we strongly suggest that the diagram is used in conjunction with the 1993 WCST manual. Our new diagrammatic scoring procedure aims to assist novice users in learning how to accurately score the task, prevent scoring errors when using the manual version of the task, and help scorers verify whether other existing computerized versions of the task (apart from the PAR version) conform to the Heaton et al. (1993) scoring method. Our diagrammatic scoring procedure holds promise to be incorporated into any future versions of the WCST manual.
威斯康星卡片分类测验(WCST)是一种流行的神经心理学测试,评分和解释都很复杂。为了简化 WCST 的评分,Berry(The Clinical Neuropsychologist 10, 117-121, 1996)开发了一种图表评分程序,特别是为了帮助评分持续性反应。我们确定了 Berry 图表的关键限制,包括其不必要的模糊性和复杂性、使用与标准化 WCST 手册中不同的术语,以及未能区分持续性错误和持续性反应。我们的新图表评分程序逐一对每个反应进行评分;我们强烈建议将图表与 1993 年 WCST 手册一起使用。我们的新图表评分程序旨在帮助新手用户学习如何准确地评分任务,防止在使用手册版本任务时出现评分错误,并帮助评分员验证其他现有的计算机化版本的任务(除了 PAR 版本)是否符合 Heaton 等人(1993)的评分方法。我们的图表评分程序有望被纳入未来任何版本的 WCST 手册。