Suppr超能文献

威斯康星卡片分类测验中的持续性反应能被准确计分吗?

Can perseverative responses on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test be scored accurately?

作者信息

Greve K W

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans, LA 70148, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1993 Nov;8(6):511-7.

Abstract

Anecdotal reports have led to questions concerning the reliability and accuracy with which Heaton's Wisconsin Card Sorting Test perseverative response criteria can be applied. In addressing this question, this study found that practicing clinicians were less accurate than "experts" and two groups of novices. A computer scoring system allowed one novice to score with "expert" level accuracy. Utilization of this system should increase scoring accuracy. However, the program cannot accurately score protocols when the response cards are in nonstandard order. Solutions to this problem are discussed.

摘要

轶事报告引发了关于希顿威斯康星卡片分类测试持续性反应标准应用的可靠性和准确性的问题。在解决这个问题的过程中,本研究发现,执业临床医生的准确性低于“专家”和两组新手。一个计算机评分系统使一名新手能够达到“专家”级别的准确性。使用该系统应能提高评分准确性。然而,当反应卡片顺序不标准时,该程序无法准确对测试记录进行评分。本文讨论了这个问题的解决方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验