Business School, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing, China.
Sanford School of Public Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):2891. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20395-y.
The growth of internet use has greatly impacted many societal sectors, including healthcare. However, current evidence about the relationship between internet usage time and public trust on doctors is insufficient.
To examine the relationship between the time spent on the internet and the level of trust in doctors, and explore its mechanism.
Multiple regression models are employed, utilizing a sample of 19,193 observations from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) in 2020. First, we regress the relative trust in doctors compared to trust in strangers on internet usage time. Subsample results across distinct population groups are explored. Second, we examine the mechanism of using the internet as an information channel through the mediation method, and further investigate the role of the internet as a communication platform by analyzing the moderation effects of socializing activity as well as social media engagement.
We find a significant negative relationship between increased internet usage time and trust in doctors. This correlation remains robust across different model specifications and variable measurements. The negative correlation is more pronounced among population groups who are elderly, male, married, with low educational levels, insured and residing in urban areas. The role of the internet as a source of information is validated as a mechanism producing the negative influence. The role of the internet as a communication platform tends to mitigate the negative consequences of internet usage, as engaging in online socializing activity can have a positive moderation effect. However, for social media engagement, its overall effect on trust in doctors is negative, potentially due to social media's dual function as a communication platform and an information source.
Although individual-focused literature tends to demonstrate a positive impact of the internet on trust in doctors in China, our study, which focuses on the general public, reveals contrasting results. Our findings imply that the primary manner in which internet usage, encompassing social media usage, influences public trust in doctors is by molding a collective perception of them. Consequently, the medical community may need to take a more proactive approach in expanding online communication channels for interacting with patients and the wider public.
互联网的使用增长极大地影响了许多社会领域,包括医疗保健。然而,目前关于互联网使用时间与公众对医生信任之间关系的证据还不够充分。
研究互联网使用时间与对医生信任程度之间的关系,并探讨其机制。
利用 2020 年中国家庭追踪调查(CFPS)的 19193 个观测值,采用多元回归模型。首先,我们将相对医生信任回归到对陌生人的信任上,并考察不同人群的子样本结果。其次,我们通过中介方法检验将互联网作为信息渠道的作用机制,并通过分析社交活动和社交媒体参与的调节作用,进一步研究互联网作为沟通平台的作用。
我们发现,互联网使用时间的增加与对医生的信任呈显著负相关。这种相关性在不同的模型设定和变量测量中都保持稳健。在年龄较大、男性、已婚、受教育程度较低、有保险和居住在城市的人群中,这种负相关更为明显。互联网作为信息来源的作用被验证为产生负面影响的机制。互联网作为沟通平台的作用倾向于减轻互联网使用的负面影响,因为参与在线社交活动具有积极的调节作用。然而,对于社交媒体参与,其对医生信任的总体影响是负面的,这可能是由于社交媒体具有沟通平台和信息源的双重功能。
尽管以个体为中心的文献倾向于表明互联网对中国医生信任有积极影响,但我们以普通公众为重点的研究得出了相反的结果。我们的发现表明,互联网使用(包括社交媒体使用)影响公众对医生信任的主要方式是塑造对他们的集体看法。因此,医疗界可能需要更积极地拓展在线沟通渠道,与患者和更广泛的公众进行互动。