Suppr超能文献

射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者非阵发性心房颤动消融的疗效与局限性

Efficacy and limitation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

作者信息

Fukui Akira, Hirota Kei, Mitarai Kazuki, Kondo Hidekazu, Yamaguchi Takanori, Shinohara Tetsuji, Takahashi Naohiko

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Clinical Examination, Oita University, Oita, Japan.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saga University, Saga, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2025 Jan;36(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/jce.16463. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the long-term outcomes and subclinical HF after nonparoxysmal AF ablation in HFpEF patients have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One-hundred-ninety nonparoxysmal AF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% who underwent first-time AF ablation were studied. HFpEF was diagnosed from a history of congestive HF and/or combined criteria of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, including average septal-lateral E/e' and tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity. Ninety-five patients with HFpEF (HFpEF group) were compared with 95 patients without HF (CNT group). Low voltage area (LVA) was defined as an area with a bipolar electrogram of <0.5 mV covering >5% of the total left atrial surface. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening HF. The secondary endpoint was subclinical HFpEF defined from NT-proBNP concentration and average septal-lateral E/e' or tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity at 6-12 months after the procedure irrespective of the rhythm. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the primary composite endpoint did not differ between the two groups (mean follow-up period 707 ± 75 days, log-rank p = 0.5330). However, significantly more patients in the HFpEF group reached the secondary endpoint (42 [44%] vs. 13 [14%], p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high preablation NT-proBNP (odds ratio [OR] 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.002, p = 0.0040) and the existence of LVA (OR 5.983, 95% CI 1.463-31.768, p = 0.0194) independently predicted the secondary endpoint in HFpEF patients.

CONCLUSION

After nonparoxysmal AF ablation, mortality of HFpEF patients was not inferior compared to patients without coexisting HF. However, subclinical HF occasionally persisted especially in HFpEF patients with a high preprocedure NT-proBNP concentration and LVA.

摘要

引言

心房颤动(AF)导管消融术可降低射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)患者的HF住院率。然而,HFpEF患者非阵发性AF消融术后的长期结局和亚临床HF尚未得到充分评估。

方法和结果

研究了190例首次接受AF消融术、左心室射血分数≥50%的非阵发性AF患者。HFpEF根据充血性HF病史和/或N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)浓度及经胸超声心动图参数(包括平均室间隔-侧壁E/e'和三尖瓣反流峰值速度)的综合标准进行诊断。95例HFpEF患者(HFpEF组)与95例无HF患者(CNT组)进行比较。低电压区(LVA)定义为双极电图<0.5 mV且覆盖左心房总面积>5%的区域。主要终点是任何原因导致的死亡或因HF恶化住院的复合终点。次要终点是根据术后6至12个月的NT-proBNP浓度和平均室间隔-侧壁E/e'或三尖瓣反流峰值速度定义的亚临床HFpEF,无论心律如何。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示两组的主要复合终点无差异(平均随访期707±75天,对数秩检验p = 0.5330)。然而,HFpEF组达到次要终点的患者明显更多(42例[44%]对13例[14%],p < 0.0001)。多变量分析显示,消融术前高NT-proBNP(比值比[OR] 1.001,95%置信区间[CI] 1.001 - 1.002,p = 0.0040)和LVA的存在(OR 5.983,95% CI 1.463 - 31.768,p = 0.0194)独立预测HFpEF患者的次要终点。

结论

非阵发性AF消融术后,HFpEF患者的死亡率与无并存HF的患者相比并不逊色。然而,亚临床HF偶尔会持续存在,尤其是在术前NT-proBNP浓度高且存在LVA的HFpEF患者中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验