Suppr超能文献

对于射血分数保留的心房颤动和心力衰竭患者,重复导管消融术后维持窦性心律是否有效?

Is sinus rhythm maintenance after repeat catheter ablation effective in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?

作者信息

Egami Yasuyuki, Kobayashi Noriyuki, Sugino Ayako, Abe Masaru, Osuga Mizuki, Nohara Hiroaki, Kawanami Shodai, Ukita Kohei, Kawamura Akito, Yasumoto Koji, Okamoto Naotaka, Matsunaga-Lee Yasuharu, Yano Masamichi, Nishino Masami

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Sakai, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2024 Dec;35(12):2452-2459. doi: 10.1111/jce.16464. Epub 2024 Oct 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recently, sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance (SRM) after catheter ablation (CA) of AF (AFCA) in HFpEF has shown to reduce adverse events as compared to medical treatment. However, it remains unclear whether SRM after a repeat CA for recurrent AF has the same effect as SRM after the initial CA in patients with AF and HFpEF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 244 AF patients with HFpEF who maintained SR after repeat AFCA (repeat CA-SRM group, n = 54) and initial AFCA (initial CA-SRM group, n = 190). HFpEF were defined as HFA-PEFF score of 5 or 6 and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 50% before the initial CA. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, or strokes within 3 years after the initial or repeat CA. The incidence of the primary endpoint was similar between the repeat CA-SRM and initial CA-SRM groups (3 of 54 [5.6%] vs. 8 of 190 [4.2%], p = .423 by a log-rank test). There was no significant difference in the 12-month HFA-PEFF score and the proportion of a 12-month HFA-PEFF score <5 between the repeat CA-SRM and the initial CA-SRM groups (5 [4,6] vs. 5 [4,6], p = .915, and 46% vs. 35%, p = .426, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AF and HFpEF diagnosed by HFA-PEFF score, the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalizations, and strokes was similar between the repeat CA-SRM and initial CA-SRM groups.

摘要

背景

射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)和心房颤动(AF)与高发病率和死亡率相关。最近,与药物治疗相比,HFpEF患者房颤导管消融(AFCA)后维持窦性心律(SR)已显示可减少不良事件。然而,对于复发性房颤再次行导管消融后维持SR是否与AF和HFpEF患者首次导管消融后维持SR具有相同效果仍不清楚。

方法和结果

我们研究了244例AF合并HFpEF患者,这些患者在再次AFCA后维持SR(再次CA-SRM组,n = 54)以及首次AFCA后维持SR(首次CA-SRM组,n = 190)。HFpEF定义为初始CA前HFA-PEFF评分为5或6且左心室射血分数≥50%。主要终点为首次或再次CA后3年内全因死亡、HF住院或卒中的复合终点。再次CA-SRM组和首次CA-SRM组的主要终点发生率相似(54例中的3例[5.6%] vs. 190例中的8例[4.2%],对数秩检验p = 0.423)。再次CA-SRM组和首次CA-SRM组之间12个月HFA-PEFF评分以及12个月HFA-PEFF评分<5的比例无显著差异(分别为5[4,6] vs. 5[4,6],p = 0.915,以及46% vs. 35%,p = 0.426)。

结论

在通过HFA-PEFF评分诊断的AF和HFpEF患者中,再次CA-SRM组和首次CA-SRM组之间全因死亡、HF住院和卒中的主要终点相似。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验