Issa Tomayess, Hall Mahnaz
School of Management and Marketing, Faculty of Business and Law, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Academic Capability Development, Faculty of Business and Law, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 2;10(19):e38759. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38759. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools have become a major challenge in the education sector in terms of the way that students use and manage them. This study examines the development, implementation, and evaluation of a teamwork framework by using academic integrity standards and formative feedback to minimise the use of generative AI tools in the Business Project Management (BPM) unit and promote students' learning skills through teamwork and self/peer evaluation. This teamwork assessment was designed to transform students into independent learners by improving their cultural awareness, self-confidence, teamwork, communication, leadership, as well as personal and interpersonal skills. The study's objectives are to determine whether a teamwork framework can help to maintain academic integrity and transform BPM students into independent learners and leaders in the era of generative AI, and to determine whether lecturers' formative feedback enhances students' skills in teamwork assessment. This research comprises an empirical study of 408 local and international BPM students from different cultural backgrounds. A mixed-methods approach was used to collect data and achieve a broader perspective of the research topic. BPM students reported their satisfaction with this type of assessment since it helped them acquire skills such as intercultural effectiveness and teamwork. Following the implementation of the teamwork framework, the number of instances of academic misconduct and requests for extensions have decreased dramatically, while the assessment's average marks increased by 10 %. A set of recommendations is offered that will ensure the successful implementation of the proposed framework for teamwork assessment and self/peer evaluation. This study was limited to the Business Project Management unit, but in 2024, the same study will be conducted involving other postgraduate units at Curtin University with a future rollout in other universities to compare how students perceive teamwork assessment.
生成式人工智能(AI)工具在学生使用和管理方式上已成为教育领域的一项重大挑战。本研究通过运用学术诚信标准和形成性反馈,考察了一个团队合作框架的开发、实施和评估,以尽量减少商业项目管理(BPM)单元中生成式AI工具的使用,并通过团队合作以及自我/同伴评估来提升学生的学习技能。这项团队合作评估旨在通过提高学生的文化意识、自信心、团队合作、沟通、领导能力以及个人和人际技能,将他们转变为独立学习者。该研究的目标是确定一个团队合作框架是否有助于在生成式AI时代维护学术诚信,并将BPM专业的学生转变为独立学习者和领导者,以及确定讲师的形成性反馈是否能提高学生在团队合作评估中的技能。本研究对408名来自不同文化背景的本地和国际BPM专业学生进行了实证研究。采用混合方法收集数据,以更全面地了解研究主题。BPM专业学生对这种评估方式表示满意,因为它帮助他们获得了跨文化效能和团队合作等技能。在实施团队合作框架后,学术不端行为的发生率和延期申请数量大幅下降,而评估的平均成绩提高了10%。文中提出了一系列建议,以确保所提议的团队合作评估和自我/同伴评估框架的成功实施。本研究仅限于商业项目管理单元,但在2024年,将对科廷大学的其他研究生单元开展同样的研究,并在未来推广至其他大学,以比较学生对团队合作评估的看法。