Suppr超能文献

综合医学神经科学课程中形成性评估的有效反馈策略

Effective Feedback Strategy for Formative Assessment in an Integrated Medical Neuroscience Course.

作者信息

Goodwin Richard L, Nathaniel Thomas I

机构信息

University of South Carolina School of Medicine Greenville, 29605 Greenville, SC USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2023 May 16;33(3):747-753. doi: 10.1007/s40670-023-01801-3. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite the different benefits of formative assessments in an integrated medical curriculum, the effective strategies to provide feedback to medical students to benefit from the different merits of formative assessment are not fully understood. This study aims to determine the effect of different strategies of formative feedback on students' outcomes in a medical neuroscience course.

METHOD

We compared medical students' performance in summative examinations in the academic year that formative feedback was provided using in-person discussion and compared such performances with the academic year when the feedback was provided by written rationales or a combination of written rationales and in-person discussion. We also surveyed medical students' preferences for whether written or in-person formative feedback is a better strategy to provide feedback at the end of each course.

RESULTS

ANOVA found a significant difference in summative performance scores for those scoring ≥ 70% when formative feedback was provided by providing a rationale, in-person, and a combination of both ([ (2,80) = 247.60,  < 0.001]. Post hoc analysis revealed a significant and highest performance when feedback was provided using the written rationale approach (*** < 0.05), followed by in-person (** < 0.05). In contrast, the least performance was recorded when formative feedback was provided using a combination of providing a written rationale for the answers to the questions and in-person discussion of the questions (* < 0.05). Students' preferred approach for receiving formative feedback for their formative assessment was highest for written rationale (*** < 0.05), followed by in-person or a combination of in-person and written rationale (** < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results found that medical students preferred a written formative feedback approach, which was associated with better student performance on the summative examination. This study reveals the importance of developing effective strategies to provide formative feedback to medical students for medical students to fully benefit from the merits of formative assessment in an integrated medical school curriculum.

摘要

目的

尽管形成性评估在综合医学课程中有不同的益处,但如何向医学生提供反馈以使其从形成性评估的不同优点中受益的有效策略尚未得到充分理解。本研究旨在确定医学神经科学课程中不同形成性反馈策略对学生成绩的影响。

方法

我们比较了在使用面对面讨论提供形成性反馈的学年中,医学生在总结性考试中的表现,并将这些表现与通过书面理由或书面理由与面对面讨论相结合提供反馈的学年进行比较。我们还调查了医学生对于书面或面对面形成性反馈哪种是在每门课程结束时提供反馈的更好策略的偏好。

结果

方差分析发现,当通过提供理由、面对面以及两者结合的方式提供形成性反馈时,那些得分≥70%的学生在总结性成绩得分上存在显著差异(F(2,80)=247.60,p<0.001)。事后分析显示,使用书面理由方法提供反馈时成绩显著且最高(p<0.05),其次是面对面(p<0.05)。相比之下,当通过为问题答案提供书面理由和对问题进行面对面讨论相结合的方式提供形成性反馈时,成绩最低(p<0.05)。学生对于形成性评估接受形成性反馈的首选方法中,书面理由最高(p<0.05),其次是面对面或面对面与书面理由相结合(p<0.05)。

结论

我们的结果发现医学生更喜欢书面形成性反馈方法,这与学生在总结性考试中的更好表现相关。本研究揭示了制定有效策略向医学生提供形成性反馈的重要性,以便医学生能在综合医学院课程中充分从形成性评估的优点中受益。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

5
Global trends in medical education accreditation.医学教育认证的全球趋势
Hum Resour Health. 2021 May 20;19(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00588-x.
8
Feedback in the clinical setting.临床环境中的反馈。
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 3;20(Suppl 2):460. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02280-5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验