Haworth Simon, Kastenbom Lisa, Persson Peter, Fries Niklas, Esberg Anders, Jönsson Daniel, Johansson Ingegerd
Bristol Dental School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Department of Odontology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;53(1):69-76. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.13014. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
The objectives were to: (i) assess the accuracy of dental data for adults obtained from the Swedish Quality Register on Caries and Periodontitis (SKaPa); (ii) explore whether Latent Class Analysis (LCA) can identify groups of people based on caries data; and (iii) characterise the dental, medical and behavioural characteristics of people in the LCA-derived classes.
Caries data from the SKaPa register were compared with clinical data collected by five experienced dentists in a nested subgroup of the Malmö Offspring Study (MOS), namely the Malmö Offspring Dental Study (MODS) (n = 724) for validation. Dental data from SKaPa were then used to classify 61 984 adult participants of the Västerbotten Intervention Programme (VIP) into five classes using LCA and DMFS-based quintile ranking, respectively. Dental status (including caries progression over 5 years), medical, anthropometric and behavioural characteristics were compared between the groups. Analyses were replicated in 2767 adults in the MOS.
DMFS-scores and number of teeth recorded within -2 to +2 years showed excellent agreement between the SKaPa and reference data with intra-class correlations > 0.90. The five LCA classes differed in mean DMFS from 10.0 to 94.4. There were strong associations between LCA class and health, and health and behavioural measures respectively, including some associations that were not detected using DMFS-ranked quintile groups. LCA class was associated with incremental change in DMFS, DFS, and number of teeth. The results in the MOS cohort were consistent with the results in the VIP cohort.
Dental data for adults from the SKaPa registry were considered accurate within 2 years of recording. The LCA approach can classify participants into caries subtypes based on dental charting. These groups differ in health and behavioural characteristics and future caries increment. The LCA approach may capture some information that is missing from DMFS-ranked quintile groups, but is also heavily influenced by total DMFS, meaning that applying LCA in cumulative, highly age-determined diseases, such as caries, is a challenge.
本研究目的如下:(i)评估从瑞典龋病与牙周炎质量登记册(SKaPa)获取的成人牙科数据的准确性;(ii)探讨潜在类别分析(LCA)是否能够根据龋病数据识别出不同人群组;(iii)描述LCA得出的类别中人群的牙齿、医学和行为特征。
将SKaPa登记册中的龋病数据与马尔默后代研究(MOS)的一个嵌套亚组(即马尔默后代牙科研究(MODS),n = 724)中五名经验丰富的牙医收集的临床数据进行比较以进行验证。然后,使用SKaPa中的牙科数据,分别通过LCA和基于龋失补牙面数(DMFS)的五分位数排名,将韦斯特博滕干预计划(VIP)的61984名成年参与者分为五类。比较了各组之间的牙齿状况(包括5年期间的龋病进展)、医学、人体测量和行为特征。在MOS的2767名成年人中重复进行了分析。
SKaPa与参考数据之间,在-2至+2年内记录的DMFS评分和牙齿数量显示出极好的一致性,组内相关系数> 0.90。五个LCA类别在平均DMFS方面从10.0到94.4不等。LCA类别与健康之间以及健康与行为指标之间分别存在很强的关联,包括一些使用基于DMFS排名的五分位数组未检测到的关联。LCA类别与DMFS、龋补牙面数(DFS)和牙齿数量的增量变化相关。MOS队列中的结果与VIP队列中的结果一致。
SKaPa登记册中成人的牙科数据在记录的2年内被认为是准确的。LCA方法可以根据牙科图表将参与者分类为龋病亚型。这些组在健康和行为特征以及未来龋病增量方面存在差异。LCA方法可能会捕捉到基于DMFS排名的五分位数组中缺失的一些信息,但也受到总DMFS的严重影响,这意味着在诸如龋病等累积性、高度由年龄决定的疾病中应用LCA是一项挑战。