Houghton Douglas, Patel Samarth, Gerasim Sergey, Buryk Yaroslav, Massad Nina, Alkhachroum Ayham, Atallah Hany Y, O'Phelan Kristine
Associate Chief, Clinical Operations, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL, USA.
Department of Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 Apr;40(4):404-409. doi: 10.1177/08850666241289115. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
Thousands of critically ill patients every year in the United States receive tracheostomy and gastrostomy procedures. Recent research has investigated the benefits of a combined team approach to these procedures, with associated decreases in length of stay (LOS) and hospital costs. This study's objective was to determine if implementing a bedside percutaneous tracheostomy and percutaneous ultrasound gastrostomy (PUG) team would reduce LOS and hospital costs. This retrospective chart review compares the impact of implementing an ICU bedside percutaneous tracheostomy and PUG service team to the hospital's previous workflow (ie, pre-implementation). Inclusion criteria were adult patients with Ventilator Dependent Respiratory Failure (VDRF), a clinical indication for both procedures while admitted to the ICU and received both tracheostomy and gastrostomy procedures while admitted to the hospital. Pre- and post-implementation groups were compared across patients' demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes. ICU LOS, hospital LOS and total hospital costs were the primary outcome measures. A total of 101 adult critically ill patients were included in the analysis; 49 patients were in the pre-implementation group and 52 patients in the post-implementation group (ie, PUG group). Patients in the PUG group had a significantly shorter mean ICU LOS and hospital LOS, 10.9- and 14.7-day reductions respectively (p = 0.010, p = 0.006). PUG group patients also had a significant reduction in total hospital costs, a per patient cost savings of $34 778 (p = 0.043). This study supports implementing a bedside percutaneous tracheostomy and PUG team to reduce LOS and total hospital costs in patients with VDRF.
在美国,每年有数千名重症患者接受气管造口术和胃造口术。最近的研究探讨了采用联合团队方式进行这些手术的益处,结果显示住院时间(LOS)和医院成本有所降低。本研究的目的是确定实施床边经皮气管造口术和经皮超声胃造口术(PUG)团队是否会减少住院时间和医院成本。这项回顾性图表审查比较了实施重症监护病房(ICU)床边经皮气管造口术和PUG服务团队对医院先前工作流程(即实施前)的影响。纳入标准为患有呼吸机依赖型呼吸衰竭(VDRF)的成年患者,在入住ICU期间有这两种手术的临床指征,且在住院期间接受了气管造口术和胃造口术。对实施前和实施后的两组患者的人口统计学特征、临床特征和结果进行了比较。ICU住院时间、医院住院时间和医院总费用是主要的结局指标。共有101名成年重症患者纳入分析;49名患者在实施前组,52名患者在实施后组(即PUG组)。PUG组患者的平均ICU住院时间和医院住院时间显著缩短,分别减少了10.9天和14.7天(p = 0.010,p = 0.006)。PUG组患者的医院总费用也显著降低,每位患者节省成本34778美元(p = 0.043)。本研究支持实施床边经皮气管造口术和PUG团队,以减少VDRF患者的住院时间和医院总费用。