• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成功之路:多专业急性创伤保健团队的实施降低了需要行气管切开术的神经损伤患者的住院时间和成本。

PATHway to success: Implementation of a multiprofessional acute trauma health care team decreased length of stay and cost in patients with neurological injury requiring tracheostomy.

机构信息

From the Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):176-179. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002494.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002494
PMID:31464872
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine whether the implementation of a dedicated multiprofessional acute trauma health care (mPATH) team would decrease length of stay without adversely impacting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries. The mPATH team was comprised of a physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapist, nurse navigator, social worker, advanced care provider, and physician who performed rounds on the subset of trauma patients with these injuries from the intensive care unit to discharge.

METHODS

Following the formation and implementation of the mPATH team at our Level I trauma center, a retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients in the year immediately prior to the introduction of the mPATH team (n = 60) to those in the first full year following implementation (n = 70). Demographics were collected for both groups. Inclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 8 on postinjury Day 2, all paraplegic and quadriplegic patients, and patients older than 55 years with central cord syndrome who underwent tracheostomy. The primary endpoint was length of stay; secondary endpoints were time to tracheostomy, days to evaluation by occupational, physical, and speech therapy, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality.

RESULTS

The median time to evaluation by occupational, physical, and speech therapy was universally decreased. Injury Severity Score was 27 in both cohorts. Time to tracheostomy and length of stay were both decreased. Thirty-day readmission and mortality rates remained unchanged. A cost savings of US $11,238 per index hospitalization was observed.

CONCLUSION

In the year following the initiation of the mPATH team, we observed earlier time to occupational, physical, and speech therapist evaluation, decreased length of stay, and cost savings in severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injury patients requiring tracheostomy compared with our historical control. These benefits were observed without adversely impacting 30-day readmission or mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic/care management, Level III.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定是否实施专门的多专业急性创伤保健(mPATH)团队会降低住院时间,而不会对严重创伤性脑和脊髓损伤患者的结局产生不利影响。mPATH 团队由物理治疗师、职业治疗师、言语治疗师、呼吸治疗师、护士导航员、社会工作者、高级护理人员和医师组成,他们负责对来自重症监护病房的创伤患者进行查房,这些患者有上述这些损伤。

方法

在我们的一级创伤中心成立并实施 mPATH 团队后,我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,比较了在引入 mPATH 团队的前一年(n=60)的患者与实施后的第一年(n=70)的患者。为两组患者收集了人口统计学资料。纳入标准为伤后第 2 天格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分小于 8,所有截瘫和四肢瘫患者,以及年龄大于 55 岁且有中央脊髓综合征的患者需行气管切开术。主要终点为住院时间;次要终点为气管切开时间、接受职业、物理和言语治疗评估的天数、30 天再入院率和 30 天死亡率。

结果

接受职业、物理和言语治疗评估的中位时间普遍缩短。两个队列的损伤严重程度评分均为 27。气管切开时间和住院时间均缩短。30 天再入院率和死亡率保持不变。观察到每例住院索引的成本节省了 11238 美元。

结论

在启动 mPATH 团队的一年后,我们观察到严重创伤性脑和脊髓损伤患者需要气管切开术的患者接受职业、物理和言语治疗师评估的时间更早,住院时间更短,并且节省了成本,与我们的历史对照相比。这些益处并未导致 30 天再入院率或死亡率增加。

证据水平

治疗/护理管理,III 级。

相似文献

1
PATHway to success: Implementation of a multiprofessional acute trauma health care team decreased length of stay and cost in patients with neurological injury requiring tracheostomy.成功之路:多专业急性创伤保健团队的实施降低了需要行气管切开术的神经损伤患者的住院时间和成本。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Jan;88(1):176-179. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002494.
2
Outcomes of patients with spinal cord injury before and after introduction of an interdisciplinary tracheostomy team.跨学科气管切开术团队引入前后脊髓损伤患者的治疗结果。
Crit Care Resusc. 2009 Mar;11(1):14-9.
3
Early Tracheostomy in Patients With Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Appears Safe and May Improve Outcomes.早期气管切开术治疗创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者安全有效,可能改善预后。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Aug;43(16):1110-1116. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002537.
4
American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Predicts the Need for Tracheostomy After Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表可预测颈脊髓损伤后气管切开的必要性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2015 Sep 15;40(18):1407-13. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001008.
5
Experience with Traumatic Brain Injury: Is Early Tracheostomy Associated with Better Prognosis?创伤性脑损伤的经验:早期气管切开术与更好的预后相关吗?
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.060. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
6
Length of stay and mortality in neurocritically ill patients: impact of a specialized neurocritical care team.神经重症患者的住院时间和死亡率:专业神经重症护理团队的影响
Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2311-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000146132.29042.4c.
7
Early Tracheostomy in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Comparison With Late Tracheostomy.严重创伤性脑损伤患者的早期气管切开术:荟萃分析及与晚期气管切开术的比较。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Apr;48(4):e325-e331. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004239.
8
Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Patients With Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.急性创伤性脊髓损伤患者早期与晚期气管切开术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Anesth Analg. 2021 Feb 1;132(2):384-394. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005212.
9
Impact of an early mobilization protocol on outcomes in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A retrospective pre-post study.早期活动方案对 ICU 收治创伤患者结局的影响:回顾性前后研究。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Apr;88(4):515-521. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002588.
10
Safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary percutaneous tracheostomy program.多学科经皮气管切开术项目的安全性、效率和成本效益。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Jun;40(6):1827-34. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e16af.

引用本文的文献

1
Characterizing pre-discharge interventions to reduce length of stay for older adults: A scoping review.确定减少老年人住院时间的出院前干预措施:一项范围综述。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 10;20(2):e0318233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318233. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical management and nursing care for patients with tracheostomy following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后气管切开患者的临床管理与护理
Front Neurol. 2024 Dec 20;15:1455926. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1455926. eCollection 2024.
3
Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Strategies and Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery.
神经康复进展:创伤性脑损伤恢复的策略与结果
Cureus. 2024 Jun 12;16(6):e62242. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62242. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Hospital-based patient navigation programs for patients who experience injury-related trauma and their caregivers: a scoping review.基于医院的患者导航计划,用于经历与伤害相关的创伤的患者及其护理人员:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 26;12(12):e066260. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066260.
5
Hospital-based patient navigation programmes for patients who experience injury-related trauma and their caregivers: a scoping review protocol.基于医院的患者导航计划对经历与伤害相关的创伤的患者及其照顾者:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e055750. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055750.
6
Improving length of stay on a trauma service.改善创伤科的住院时长。
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2021 Aug 26;6(1):e000744. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2021-000744. eCollection 2021.