Suppr超能文献

随机和交替起搏方案评估心脏传导稳定性。

Stochastic and alternating pacing paradigms to assess the stability of cardiac conduction.

机构信息

Department of Physiology, University of Bern, Bühlplatz 5, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2024 Dec;197:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2024.10.007. Epub 2024 Oct 20.

Abstract

Reentry, the most common cause of severe arrhythmias, is initiated by slow conduction and conduction block. Hence, evaluating conduction velocity and conduction block is of primary importance. However, the assessment of cardiac conduction safety in experimental and clinical settings remains elusive. To identify markers of conduction instability that can be determined experimentally, we developed an approach based on new pacing paradigms. Conduction across a cardiac tissue expansion was assessed in computer simulations and in experiments using cultures of neonatal murine cardiomyocytes on microelectrode arrays. Simulated and in vitro tissues were paced at a progressively increasing rate, with stochastic or alternating variations of cycle length, until conduction block occurred. Increasing pacing rate led to conduction block near the expansion. When stochastic or alternating variations were introduced into the pacing protocol, the standard deviation and the amplitude of alternating variations of local conduction times emerged as markers of unstable conduction prone to block. In both simulations and experiments, conduction delays were prolonged at the expansion but increased only slightly during the pacing protocol. In contrast, these markers of instability increased several-fold, early before block occurrence. The first and second moments of these two metrics provided an estimation of the site of block and the accuracy of this estimation. Therefore, when beat-to-beat variations of pacing cycle length are introduced into a pacing protocol, the local variability of conduction permits to predict sites of block. Our pacing paradigms may have translational applications in clinical cardiac electrophysiology, particularly in identifying ablation targets during mapping procedures.

摘要

再入,即导致严重心律失常的最常见原因,是由缓慢传导和传导阻滞引发的。因此,评估传导速度和传导阻滞至关重要。然而,在实验和临床环境中评估心脏传导安全性仍然是一个难题。为了确定可通过实验确定的传导不稳定性标志物,我们开发了一种基于新起搏模式的方法。在计算机模拟和使用微电极阵列培养的新生鼠心肌细胞的实验中,评估了心脏组织扩张处的传导。模拟和体外组织以逐渐增加的速率起搏,采用随机或交替变化的周期长度,直到发生传导阻滞。增加起搏率会导致在扩张附近发生传导阻滞。当在起搏方案中引入随机或交替变化时,局部传导时间的交替变化的标准差和幅度成为易发生阻滞的不稳定传导的标志物。在模拟和实验中,在扩张处的传导延迟延长,但在起搏方案期间仅略有增加。相比之下,这些不稳定性标志物增加了数倍,在阻滞发生之前很早。这两个指标的第一和第二矩提供了阻滞部位的估计值以及该估计值的准确性。因此,当在起搏方案中引入起搏周期长度的逐拍变化时,局部传导的可变性可以预测阻滞部位。我们的起搏模式可能在临床心脏电生理学中有转化应用,特别是在映射程序中确定消融靶点。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验