Haggstrom Lucy, Lee Yeh Chen, Scott Clare, Harter Philipp, Woelber Linn, Ledermann Jonathan, Gourley Charlie, McNeish Iain A, Amant Frédéric, Ray-Coquard Isabelle, Leary Alexandra, Oza Amit M, Tinker Anna, González Martin Antonio, Cecere Sabrina Chiara, Pignata Sandro, Colombo Nicoletta, Yoshida Hiroyuki, Marth Christian, Rosengarten Ora, Moore Kathleen Nadine, Gómez-García Eva María, Tan David, Friedlander Michael L
Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 Dec 2;34(12):1932-1939. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005976.
There are no data, and thus no consensus, on the optimal duration of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor maintenance therapy for exceptional responders (here defined as progression-free for 5 years or longer) with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The current licence is to continue PARP inhibitors until progression or toxicity; however, international practice varies considerably. The risks of late progression and late-onset myeloid malignancies, defined as occurring beyond 5 years of PARP inhibition, are unknown. This study aims to examine the practice patterns and opinions regarding the management and surveillance protocols of exceptional responders with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer.
An online international survey of experts from June 2023 to June 2024 was carried out, disseminated at Gynaecologic Cancer Intergroup meetings and by Chairs of Cooperative Groups.
210 responses were received from 26 countries including Australia (27 respondents), Germany (24), the UK (21), the Netherlands (16), France (13), Spain (12), Canada (12), Italy (11), Japan (11), and other countries (63). Most respondents did not have institutional or trials group guidelines regarding duration of PARP inhibitors (154, 73.3%). For the minority with guidelines, recommendations varied: 1 year (2), 2 years (13), 3 years (4), and indefinite treatment (22). Individual practice varied considerably for those without guidelines: most (116, 76.3%) recommended ≥5 years of PARP inhibition, of which 73 (48.0%) recommended indefinite PARP inhibition. Sixty-six respondents (31.4%) reported having patients with late progression and 46 (22.0%) had cases with late-onset myeloid malignancies. Surveillance practices varied widely across all respondents.
This international survey highlights the diverse practice variations and disparate views on the optimal duration of maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors in platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. The responses suggest a notable risk of late progression and myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia among exceptional responders which needs confirmation. Detailed individual patient data is required to draw more reliable conclusions; another study is underway addressing this.
对于铂敏感复发性卵巢癌的超优反应者(此处定义为无进展生存期达5年或更长时间),关于聚(ADP - 核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂维持治疗的最佳持续时间,目前尚无相关数据,因此也未达成共识。当前的许可规定是持续使用PARP抑制剂直至疾病进展或出现毒性;然而,国际上的做法差异很大。PARP抑制超过5年后发生的晚期进展和迟发性髓系恶性肿瘤的风险尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨关于铂敏感复发性卵巢癌超优反应者的管理和监测方案的实践模式及观点。
于2023年6月至2024年6月对国际专家进行了一项在线调查,通过妇科肿瘤协作组会议以及各合作组主席进行传播。
共收到来自26个国家的210份回复,包括澳大利亚(27名受访者)、德国(24名)、英国(21名)、荷兰(16名)、法国(13名)、西班牙(12名)、加拿大(12名)、意大利(11名)、日本(11名)以及其他国家(63名)。大多数受访者没有关于PARP抑制剂持续时间的机构或试验组指南(154名,73.3%)。对于少数有指南的受访者,建议各不相同:1年(2名)、2年(13名)、3年(4名)以及无限期治疗(22名)。对于没有指南的受访者,个人做法差异很大:大多数(116名,76.3%)建议PARP抑制≥5年,其中73名(48.0%)建议无限期PARP抑制。66名受访者(31.4%)报告有患者出现晚期进展,46名(22.0%)有迟发性髓系恶性肿瘤病例。所有受访者的监测做法差异很大。
这项国际调查突出了在铂敏感复发性卵巢癌中,对于PARP抑制剂维持治疗的最佳持续时间存在多样的实践差异和不同观点。这些回复表明超优反应者中存在晚期进展以及骨髓增生异常综合征/急性髓系白血病的显著风险,这需要进一步证实。需要详细的个体患者数据才能得出更可靠的结论;另一项针对此问题的研究正在进行中。