Hayes-Skelton Sarah A, Roemer Lizabeth, Orsillo Susan M
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Psychology, Suffolk University, Boston, MA, USA.
Cogn Behav Ther. 2025 Jul;54(4):441-456. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2024.2417423. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
To examine the maintenance effects of acceptance-based behavior therapy (ABBT) and applied relaxation (AR) for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) 46 adults (69.6% female, 82.6% White) with high end-state functioning following an RCT comparing ABBT to AR were re-assessed at 12- and 24-month follow-up. End-state functioning was based on post-treatment scores within one standard deviation of the mean on three of five outcome measures [Clinician Severity Rating (CSR), Hamilton Anxiety, Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ), Depression Anxiety Stress Scale stress subscale (DASS-Stress), and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)]. At 12 months, 93.8% of high endstate responders in ABBT and 95.5% in AR had maintained gains. At 24 months, 71.4% of responders from ABBT and 83.3% from AR maintained gains. Mixed-effects regression models revealed a significant effect for Time and Condition for DASS-Stress but not for Condition X Time. There was also a significant time effect for PSWQ, indicating PSWQ and DASS-Stress scores increased across follow-up. The rate of increase did not differ across conditions. Non-significant, small effects were found for all other outcomes indicating that symptoms did not significantly change across follow-up regardless of condition. While the results are limited by dropout rates, clients receiving ABBT or AR appear to maintain gains over long-term follow-up.
为了检验基于接纳的行为疗法(ABBT)和应用放松疗法(AR)对广泛性焦虑症(GAD)的维持效果,在一项将ABBT与AR进行比较的随机对照试验后,对46名具有高终态功能的成年人(69.6%为女性,82.6%为白人)在12个月和24个月的随访中进行了重新评估。终态功能基于五项结果测量指标中三项在均值一个标准差范围内的治疗后得分[临床医生严重程度评定量表(CSR)、汉密尔顿焦虑量表、宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷(PSWQ)、抑郁焦虑压力量表压力分量表(DASS-Stress)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)]。在12个月时,接受ABBT的高终态反应者中有93.8%维持了改善,接受AR的为95.5%。在24个月时,接受ABBT的反应者中有71.4%维持了改善,接受AR的为83.3%。混合效应回归模型显示,对于DASS-Stress,时间和治疗条件有显著影响,但治疗条件×时间无显著影响。PSWQ也有显著的时间效应,表明PSWQ和DASS-Stress得分在随访期间有所增加。不同治疗条件下的增加率没有差异。所有其他结果均发现非显著的小效应,表明无论治疗条件如何,症状在随访期间均未显著变化。虽然结果受到失访率的限制,但接受ABBT或AR治疗的患者在长期随访中似乎维持了改善。