Sanchez-Gomez S, Moreno-Luna R, Martin-Jimenez D, Maza-Solano J, Del Cuvillo A, Villacampa-Auba J-M, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Fernandez-Liesa R, Alobid I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M
Rhinology Unit, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain.
Rhinology Unit, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Virgen Macarena University Hospital, Seville, Spain; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Alava University Hospital, Alava, Spain.
Rhinology. 2025 Feb 1;63(1):125-128. doi: 10.4193/Rhin24.370.
In the last decades, various types of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) have emerged as treatments for chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), particularly with the development of personalized, endotype-driven approaches targeting mucosal inflammation and remodeling. Despite these advancements, the literature reports heterogeneous and often divergent outcomes, leaving the actual benefit of more extensive surgical approaches in CRS control a matter of ongoing debate. This discrepancy stems from inconsistent definitions of surgical techniques, leading to variations in osseous and mucosal resections depending on patient phenotype, disease severity and surgeon preference. To address this inconsistency, the Japanese Rhinology Society introduced a classification based on procedure extent, but it lacks details on anatomical structures and mucosal treatment. Similarly, the ACCESS system measures ESS extent with postoperative CT-scans but overlooks mucosal interventions.
在过去几十年中,各种类型的鼻内镜鼻窦手术(ESS)已成为慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)的治疗方法,特别是随着针对黏膜炎症和重塑的个性化、内型驱动方法的发展。尽管有这些进展,但文献报道的结果参差不齐且往往相互矛盾,使得更广泛的手术方法在控制CRS方面的实际益处仍存在争议。这种差异源于手术技术定义的不一致,导致根据患者表型、疾病严重程度和外科医生偏好,骨切除和黏膜切除存在差异。为了解决这种不一致性,日本鼻科学会引入了一种基于手术范围的分类方法,但它缺乏关于解剖结构和黏膜治疗的细节。同样,ACCESS系统通过术后CT扫描测量ESS范围,但忽略了黏膜干预。