• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护士对知识与实践差距量表的土耳其语版本的心理测量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the nurses' perception of the gap between knowledge and practice scale.

作者信息

Demir Kösem Dilek, Demir Şenay, Bektaş Murat, Bektaş İlknur

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hakkari University, Hakkari, Turkey.

Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health Sciences, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14204. doi: 10.1111/jep.14204. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1111/jep.14204
PMID:39440831
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Progress in the nursing profession and clinical decision-making are largely sustained by the coherence between theory and practice. The quality of healthcare provided by nurses and patient outcomes are adversely impacted by the gap between knowledge and practice. Measurement tools used to assess nurses' perceptions of this gap are inadequate in Türkiye. This research aimed to adapt the nurses' perception of the gap between knowledge and practice scale into Turkish and to evaluate its reliability and validity.

METHODS

The study, in which a methodological design was employed, was conducted with 406 nurses between March and June 2022. A descriptive information form and the nurses' perception of the gap between knowledge and practice scale (NPGKPS) were employed to gather data. The validity study included content and construct validity analyses, and the reliability study included item analysis, split-half test, and Cronbach alpha coefficients.

RESULTS

The scale had 35 items and four dimensions, which explained 54.65% of the total variance. The goodness of fit values, which were found following a confirmatory factor analysis, were estimated as follows: CMIN = 1808.984, DF = 512, CMIN/DF = 3.533, IFI = 0.89, TLI = 0.87, RFI = 0.83, CFI = 0.89, RMSEA = 0.079, and NFI = 0.86. Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total scale was estimated as 0.95 and it was in the range of 0.84 to 0.93 for four factors.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the nurses' perception of the gap between knowledge and practice scale was a reliable and valid measure which could be applied to Turkish society.

摘要

背景

护理专业的进步和临床决策很大程度上依赖于理论与实践之间的连贯性。知识与实践之间的差距对护士提供的医疗保健质量和患者预后产生了不利影响。在土耳其,用于评估护士对这一差距认知的测量工具并不完善。本研究旨在将护士知识与实践差距感知量表改编为土耳其语版本,并评估其信效度。

方法

本研究采用方法学设计,于2022年3月至6月对406名护士进行了调查。采用描述性信息表和护士知识与实践差距感知量表(NPGKPS)收集数据。效度研究包括内容效度和结构效度分析,信度研究包括项目分析、分半检验和克朗巴赫α系数分析。

结果

该量表有35个条目和四个维度,解释了总方差的54.65%。验证性因子分析后的拟合优度值估计如下:CMIN = 1808.984,DF = 512,CMIN/DF = 3.533,IFI = 0.89,TLI = 0.87,RFI = 0.83,CFI = 0.89,RMSEA = 0.079,NFI = 0.86。总量表的克朗巴赫α系数估计为0.95,四个因子的克朗巴赫α系数在0.84至0.93之间。

结论

总之,护士知识与实践差距感知量表是一种可靠且有效的测量工具,可应用于土耳其社会。

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of the Turkish version of the nurses' perception of the gap between knowledge and practice scale.护士对知识与实践差距量表的土耳其语版本的心理测量学评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;31(1):e14204. doi: 10.1111/jep.14204. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Implementation Leadership Scale in the context of nurses.护士情境下实施领导力量表土耳其语版的有效性和信度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 5;24(1):1347. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11721-6.
3
The psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the parents' perception of satisfaction with care from pediatric nurse practitioners instrument.土耳其版儿科护士从业者护理满意度父母感知量表的心理测量特性。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Sep-Oct;78:e75-e81. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.06.022. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
4
Simplified Chinese Trauma Advanced Practice Nurses' Core Competency Scale: A development and psychometric validation study.简体中文创伤高级实践护士核心能力量表:编制与心理测量学验证研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2024 Dec;143:106384. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106384. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
5
[Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Occupational Coping Self-Efficacy Scale for Nurses].[护士职业应对自我效能量表韩文版的效度与信度]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Nov;54(4):633-644. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24094.
6
Development and psychometric testing of the Pediatric Atraumatic Care Attitude Scale (PACAS) in pediatric nurses.儿科护士小儿无创伤护理态度量表(PACAS)的编制及心理测量学检测。
J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Nov-Dec;79:e31-e37. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.09.015. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
7
Palliative care and spiritual care competency measurement among Turkish Nurses: A scale adaptation study.土耳其护士的姑息治疗与精神护理能力评估:一项量表改编研究。
Palliat Support Care. 2023 Dec;21(6):1048-1058. doi: 10.1017/S1478951523001542.
8
The Turkish version of nursing practice readiness scale: Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.护理实践准备就绪量表的土耳其语版本:跨文化调适和心理计量评估。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2024 Aug;30(4):e13254. doi: 10.1111/ijn.13254. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
9
Adaptation and assessment of the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the nursing student competence scale.护理专业学生能力量表土耳其语版的心理测量特性的调适与评估
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 28;25(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06891-8.
10
Evaluating the validity and reliability of the V-scale instrument (Turkish version) used to determine nurses' attitudes towards vital sign monitoring.评估用于确定护士对生命体征监测态度的V量表工具(土耳其语版本)的有效性和可靠性。
Int J Nurs Pract. 2018 Jun;24(3):e12637. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12637. Epub 2018 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the emotional labour scale for nurses.护士情绪劳动量表波斯语版本的效度和信度
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 15;24(1):923. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03587-8.