Park Youngrye, Park Sunah, Kang Hee Ran
Department of Nursing, Kunsan National University, Gunsan, Korea.
Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Wonju, Korea.
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2024 Nov;54(4):633-644. doi: 10.4040/jkan.24094.
This study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the occupational coping self-efficacy for nurses (K-OCSE-N) scale.
The English version of the OCSE-N scale was translated into Korean using a translation and back-translation process. Data were gathered from 213 nurses employed in a general hospital in South Korea. The content validity was assessed using the content validity index. The construct validity was verified through exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Criterion validity was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficients with the job stress coping and general self-efficacy scales. Reliability was examined using item-total score correlation and Cronbach's α coefficient for internal consistency.
The exploratory factor analysis identified two factors that explained 61.8% of the cumulative variance: occupational burden and relational difficulty. In confirmatory factor analysis, the model exhibited adequate fit (χ²/df = 2.07, GFI = .95, SRMR = .04, RMSEA = .07, CFI = .97, and TLI = .95), with both convergent and discriminant validity deemed acceptable. The criterion validity presented a positive correlation of the K-OCSE-N with both job stress coping (r = .72, < .001) and general self-efficacy (r = .72, < .001). The internal consistency of the scale using Cronbach's α for the total items was .89.
The K-OCSE-N scale is a valid and reliable tool for measuring nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy. This study suggests that various intervention studies can use the scale to assess and strengthen nurses' occupational coping self-efficacy in nursing practice.
本研究旨在评估护士职业应对自我效能感量表韩文版(K-OCSE-N)的有效性和可靠性。
采用翻译和回译程序将OCSE-N量表英文版翻译成韩文。数据收集自韩国一家综合医院的213名护士。使用内容效度指数评估内容效度。通过探索性和验证性因素分析验证结构效度。使用与工作压力应对量表和一般自我效能量表的皮尔逊相关系数评估效标效度。使用项目总分相关和内部一致性的Cronbach's α系数检验信度。
探索性因素分析确定了两个因素,解释了61.8%的累积方差:职业负担和关系困难。在验证性因素分析中,模型显示出良好的拟合度(χ²/df = 2.07,GFI = .95,SRMR = .04,RMSEA = .07,CFI = .97,TLI = .95),收敛效度和区分效度均被认为可接受。效标效度显示K-OCSE-N与工作压力应对(r = .