Radiology Department, Rennes University Hospital, 16 Boulevard de Bulgarie, 35200, Rennes, France.
Anatomy Department, Rennes Faculty of Medicine, University of Rennes 1, 35000, Rennes, France.
Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Dec;46(12):2083-2091. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03499-3. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
This study sought to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the interface between the rotator cuff and the semicircular humeral ligament or rotator cable (RCa) using histological and biomechanical techniques.
Out of 13 eligible cadaver specimens, 5 cadaver shoulders with an intact rotator cuff were included, 8 were excluded due to an injured rotator cuff. The histological study enables us to describe the capsule-tendon interface between the infraspinatus tendon (IST) or supraspinatus tendon (SST) and RCa, and to detect loose connective tissue layers to determine their precise location and measure their length along the interface. The biomechanical study sought to characterize and compare the mechanical strength of the IST-RCa versus SST-RCa interfaces.
The average thickness of the RCa was 1.44 ± 0.20 mm. The histological study revealed a loose connective tissue layer at the IST-RCa interface, a finding not observed at the SST-RCa interface. The biomechanical study showed that the rigidity of the SST-RCa interface (72.10 N/mm) was 4.5 times higher than for the IST-RCa interface (16.10 N/mm) and the average maximum forces reached were 19.0 N and 10.6 N for the SST-RCa and IST- RCa interfaces, respectively.
The IST-RCa interface consists of a loose connective tissue layer contrary to the SST-RCa interface. In parallel, two different groups in terms of the mechanical response were identified: the IST-RCa interface group had less rigidity and ruptured more quickly than the SST-RCa interface, therefore emerging as the most vulnerable interface and explaining a potential extension of rotator cuff tears.
本研究旨在使用组织学和生物力学技术评估肩袖与半圆形肱骨韧带或旋转带(RCa)之间的界面的生物力学特性。
在 13 个符合条件的尸体标本中,纳入了 5 个具有完整肩袖的尸体肩部,由于肩袖损伤,排除了 8 个。组织学研究使我们能够描述肩胛下肌腱(IST)或冈上肌腱(SST)和 RCa 之间的囊腱界面,并检测疏松结缔组织层,以确定其确切位置并沿界面测量其长度。生物力学研究旨在表征和比较 IST-RCa 与 SST-RCa 界面的机械强度。
RCa 的平均厚度为 1.44±0.20mm。组织学研究显示 IST-RCa 界面存在疏松结缔组织层,而 SST-RCa 界面则没有。生物力学研究表明,SST-RCa 界面的刚性(72.10 N/mm)是 IST-RCa 界面的 4.5 倍(16.10 N/mm),达到的平均最大力分别为 19.0 N 和 10.6 N SST-RCa 和 IST-RCa 界面。
IST-RCa 界面由疏松结缔组织层组成,与 SST-RCa 界面相反。同时,根据机械响应确定了两个不同的组:IST-RCa 界面组的刚性较低,破裂速度较快,因此比 SST-RCa 界面更脆弱,这解释了肩袖撕裂的潜在扩展。