Sugai Shunya, Sasabuchi Yusuke, Yasunaga Hideo, Aso Shotaro, Matsui Hiroki, Fushimi Kiyohide, Yoshihara Kosuke, Nishijima Koji
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Real-World Evidence, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Mar;168(3):1047-1054. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.15953. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
To compare conservative management and appendectomy for acute appendicitis during pregnancy by trimester.
This retrospective cohort study used data from a national inpatient database from July 2010 to March 2022. Pregnant women diagnosed with acute appendicitis were included. Multivariable analysis using generalized estimating equations was performed to compare outcomes between conservative management and appendectomy across trimesters. The main outcomes were preterm labor, preterm delivery, or abortion; antepartum hemorrhage; duration of hospitalization; and duration of antibiotic use.
A total of 3158 individuals from 632 acute-care hospitals were eligible. The proportion of conservative management versus appendectomy by trimester were 507 (49.1%) versus 525 (50.9%) in the first, 690 (44.6%) versus 856 (55.4%) in the second, and 337 (58.1%) versus 243 (41.9%) in the third. In the second trimester, appendectomy was associated with a higher rate of preterm delivery, preterm labor, or abortion (odds ratio [OR], 2.91 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-5.25]). Antepartum hemorrhage occurred more frequently for appendectomy in the first (OR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.31-3.43]) and third (OR, 2.43 [95% CI, 1.79-3.31]) trimesters. Appendectomy was associated with a longer duration of hospitalization in the second (2.15 days; 95% CI, 1.14-3.17 days) and third (3.97 days; 95% CI, 2.22-5.71 days) trimesters. Antibiotic use duration was shorter for appendectomy in the first (-1.20 days [95% CI -1.51 to -0.90 days]) and second (-0.61 days [95% CI -0.90 to -0.32 days]) trimesters.
Clinical outcomes of acute appendicitis during pregnancy vary by trimester. Considering the appendectomy risks, conservative management may be viable depending on the clinical context and trimester.
按孕期比较妊娠期急性阑尾炎的保守治疗和阑尾切除术。
这项回顾性队列研究使用了2010年7月至2022年3月全国住院患者数据库中的数据。纳入诊断为急性阑尾炎的孕妇。采用广义估计方程进行多变量分析,以比较各孕期保守治疗和阑尾切除术的结果。主要结局包括早产、早产或流产;产前出血;住院时间;以及抗生素使用时间。
来自632家急症医院的3158名个体符合条件。各孕期保守治疗与阑尾切除术的比例在第一孕期为507例(49.1%)对525例(50.9%),第二孕期为690例(44.6%)对856例(55.4%),第三孕期为337例(58.1%)对243例(41.9%)。在第二孕期,阑尾切除术与更高的早产、早产或流产率相关(比值比[OR],2.91[95%置信区间(CI),1.62 - 5.25])。第一孕期(OR,2.12[95%CI,1.31 - 3.43])和第三孕期(OR,2.43[95%CI,1.79 - 3.31])阑尾切除术的产前出血更频繁。阑尾切除术与第二孕期(2.15天;95%CI,1.14 - 3.17天)和第三孕期(3.97天;95%CI,2.22 - 5.71天)更长的住院时间相关。第一孕期(-1.20天[95%CI -1.51至 -0.90天])和第二孕期(-0.61天[95%CI -0.90至 -0.32天])阑尾切除术的抗生素使用时间更短。
妊娠期急性阑尾炎的临床结局因孕期而异。考虑到阑尾切除术的风险,根据临床情况和孕期,保守治疗可能是可行的。