Yang Huan, Yang Kai
Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Orthodontics, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2024 Dec;42(12):779-788. doi: 10.1089/photob.2024.0088. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
The present study aimed to analyze the biofilm removal and bactericidal effect of laser treatment alone and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling on orthodontic brackets. It also assessed whether the use of a laser can improve the efficiency of biofilm removal and bactericidal effect compared with traditional ultrasonic instrumentation. () can lead to white spots and dental caries. Orthodontic brackets make teeth cleaning more difficult, and biofilms or bacteria on the surface of brackets worsen the oral environment, which may cause some oral diseases. Laser can be used for biofilm removal and killing bacteria on the surface of an object through thermal, photochemical, and pressure effects, which is widely used in the treatment of oral diseases. A total of 600 mandibular incisor brackets were collected for this study. Among these, 320 unused brackets were used for the crystal violet assay ( = 160) and for live/dead bacterial staining ( = 160). Another 280 brackets, obtained from patients who had undergone therapy for over two years, were used for the mature multispecies biofilms removal assay ( = 120) and multispecies bacterial live/dead bacterial staining ( = 160). Ultrasonic scaling, laser, and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling were applied to the labial surface of brackets covered by biofilm or mature multispecies biofilms. Specifically, we used the following three methods: ultrasonic scaling for 10 sec without laser; 810-nm laser (Doctor Smile, Italy, LA5D0 001.1) with 0.3-mm spot size at total 21.2 kJ/cm for 10 sec; and 810-nm laser at total 10.6 kJ/cm for 5 sec, followed by ultrasonic scaling for 5 sec. The 810-nm diode laser removed biofilms with a power of 1.5 W and a power density of 2.12 kW/cm. The biofilm was examined using crystal violet assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for mature multispecies biofilms to evaluate the effect of the three methods on biofilm removal. Live/dead bacterial staining was used to examine the bactericidal effect on remaining biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). For biofilm, the optical density (OD) value and live/dead bacterial ratio in the laser and the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic scaling group ( < 0.05); moreover, the OD value and the live/dead bacterial ratio in laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling and laser treatment alone showed no significant difference ( > 0.05). For mature multispecies biofilms, the percentage of biofilm coverage after treatment was higher in the laser group than in the ultrasonic scaling group ( < 0.05) and lower in the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling group than in the ultrasonic scaling group ( < 0.05), and live/dead bacterial staining showed that laser treatment alone killed the most bacteria, followed by laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling, while ultrasonic scaling alone seldom killed bacteria. Laser treatment alone has a better bactericidal effect and can also remove more biofilm than ultrasonic scaling alone, but it fails to remove more mature multispecies biofilms. Laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling can remove more biofilm and mature multispecies biofilms than ultrasonic scaling alone and also has a better bactericidal effect than ultrasonic scaling alone on a bracket surface.
本研究旨在分析单独激光治疗以及激光联合超声洁治对正畸托槽的生物膜清除及杀菌效果。同时评估与传统超声器械相比,使用激光是否能提高生物膜清除效率及杀菌效果。()可导致白斑和龋齿。正畸托槽使牙齿清洁更加困难,托槽表面的生物膜或细菌会恶化口腔环境,这可能引发一些口腔疾病。激光可通过热效应、光化学效应和压力效应用于清除物体表面的生物膜和杀灭细菌,在口腔疾病治疗中广泛应用。本研究共收集了600个下颌切牙托槽。其中,320个未使用的托槽用于结晶紫测定( = 160)和活/死细菌染色( = 160)。另外280个托槽取自接受治疗超过两年的患者,用于成熟多物种生物膜清除测定( = 120)和多物种细菌活/死细菌染色( = 160)。将超声洁治、激光以及激光联合超声洁治应用于覆盖有生物膜或成熟多物种生物膜的托槽唇面。具体而言,我们采用了以下三种方法:不使用激光进行10秒的超声洁治;使用光斑尺寸为0.3毫米的810纳米激光(意大利Doctor Smile,LA5D0 001.1),总能量为21.2千焦/平方厘米,持续10秒;810纳米激光总能量为10.6千焦/平方厘米,持续5秒,随后进行5秒的超声洁治。810纳米二极管激光以1.5瓦的功率和2.12千瓦/平方厘米的功率密度清除生物膜。使用结晶紫测定法检测生物膜,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察成熟多物种生物膜,以评估这三种方法对生物膜清除的效果。通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)使用活/死细菌染色法检测对残留生物膜的杀菌效果。对于生物膜,激光组和激光联合超声洁治组的光密度(OD)值及活/死细菌比例显著低于超声洁治组( < 0.05);此外,激光联合超声洁治组与单独激光治疗组的OD值及活/死细菌比例无显著差异( > 0.05)。对于成熟多物种生物膜,激光组治疗后生物膜覆盖百分比高于超声洁治组( < 0.05),激光联合超声洁治组低于超声洁治组( < 0.05),活/死细菌染色显示单独激光治疗杀灭的细菌最多,其次是激光联合超声洁治,而单独超声洁治很少能杀灭细菌。单独激光治疗具有更好的杀菌效果,并且与单独超声洁治相比能清除更多生物膜,但清除成熟多物种生物膜的能力不足。激光联合超声洁治比单独超声洁治能清除更多生物膜和成熟多物种生物膜,并且在托槽表面的杀菌效果也优于单独超声洁治。