• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

810纳米高功率激光对正畸托槽表面的生物膜清除及杀菌作用:一项体外研究

The Biofilm Removal and Bactericidal Effect of an 810-nm High-Power Laser on an Orthodontic Bracket Surface: An In Vitro Study.

作者信息

Yang Huan, Yang Kai

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Department of Orthodontics, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2024 Dec;42(12):779-788. doi: 10.1089/photob.2024.0088. Epub 2024 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1089/photob.2024.0088
PMID:39441613
Abstract

The present study aimed to analyze the biofilm removal and bactericidal effect of laser treatment alone and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling on orthodontic brackets. It also assessed whether the use of a laser can improve the efficiency of biofilm removal and bactericidal effect compared with traditional ultrasonic instrumentation. () can lead to white spots and dental caries. Orthodontic brackets make teeth cleaning more difficult, and biofilms or bacteria on the surface of brackets worsen the oral environment, which may cause some oral diseases. Laser can be used for biofilm removal and killing bacteria on the surface of an object through thermal, photochemical, and pressure effects, which is widely used in the treatment of oral diseases. A total of 600 mandibular incisor brackets were collected for this study. Among these, 320 unused brackets were used for the crystal violet assay ( = 160) and for live/dead bacterial staining ( = 160). Another 280 brackets, obtained from patients who had undergone therapy for over two years, were used for the mature multispecies biofilms removal assay ( = 120) and multispecies bacterial live/dead bacterial staining ( = 160). Ultrasonic scaling, laser, and laser combined with ultrasonic scaling were applied to the labial surface of brackets covered by biofilm or mature multispecies biofilms. Specifically, we used the following three methods: ultrasonic scaling for 10 sec without laser; 810-nm laser (Doctor Smile, Italy, LA5D0 001.1) with 0.3-mm spot size at total 21.2 kJ/cm for 10 sec; and 810-nm laser at total 10.6 kJ/cm for 5 sec, followed by ultrasonic scaling for 5 sec. The 810-nm diode laser removed biofilms with a power of 1.5 W and a power density of 2.12 kW/cm. The biofilm was examined using crystal violet assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for mature multispecies biofilms to evaluate the effect of the three methods on biofilm removal. Live/dead bacterial staining was used to examine the bactericidal effect on remaining biofilms by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). For biofilm, the optical density (OD) value and live/dead bacterial ratio in the laser and the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling groups were significantly lower than those in the ultrasonic scaling group ( < 0.05); moreover, the OD value and the live/dead bacterial ratio in laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling and laser treatment alone showed no significant difference ( > 0.05). For mature multispecies biofilms, the percentage of biofilm coverage after treatment was higher in the laser group than in the ultrasonic scaling group ( < 0.05) and lower in the laser combined with ultrasonic scaling group than in the ultrasonic scaling group ( < 0.05), and live/dead bacterial staining showed that laser treatment alone killed the most bacteria, followed by laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling, while ultrasonic scaling alone seldom killed bacteria. Laser treatment alone has a better bactericidal effect and can also remove more biofilm than ultrasonic scaling alone, but it fails to remove more mature multispecies biofilms. Laser treatment combined with ultrasonic scaling can remove more biofilm and mature multispecies biofilms than ultrasonic scaling alone and also has a better bactericidal effect than ultrasonic scaling alone on a bracket surface.

摘要

本研究旨在分析单独激光治疗以及激光联合超声洁治对正畸托槽的生物膜清除及杀菌效果。同时评估与传统超声器械相比,使用激光是否能提高生物膜清除效率及杀菌效果。()可导致白斑和龋齿。正畸托槽使牙齿清洁更加困难,托槽表面的生物膜或细菌会恶化口腔环境,这可能引发一些口腔疾病。激光可通过热效应、光化学效应和压力效应用于清除物体表面的生物膜和杀灭细菌,在口腔疾病治疗中广泛应用。本研究共收集了600个下颌切牙托槽。其中,320个未使用的托槽用于结晶紫测定( = 160)和活/死细菌染色( = 160)。另外280个托槽取自接受治疗超过两年的患者,用于成熟多物种生物膜清除测定( = 120)和多物种细菌活/死细菌染色( = 160)。将超声洁治、激光以及激光联合超声洁治应用于覆盖有生物膜或成熟多物种生物膜的托槽唇面。具体而言,我们采用了以下三种方法:不使用激光进行10秒的超声洁治;使用光斑尺寸为0.3毫米的810纳米激光(意大利Doctor Smile,LA5D0 001.1),总能量为21.2千焦/平方厘米,持续10秒;810纳米激光总能量为10.6千焦/平方厘米,持续5秒,随后进行5秒的超声洁治。810纳米二极管激光以1.5瓦的功率和2.12千瓦/平方厘米的功率密度清除生物膜。使用结晶紫测定法检测生物膜,并使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)观察成熟多物种生物膜,以评估这三种方法对生物膜清除的效果。通过共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)使用活/死细菌染色法检测对残留生物膜的杀菌效果。对于生物膜,激光组和激光联合超声洁治组的光密度(OD)值及活/死细菌比例显著低于超声洁治组( < 0.05);此外,激光联合超声洁治组与单独激光治疗组的OD值及活/死细菌比例无显著差异( > 0.05)。对于成熟多物种生物膜,激光组治疗后生物膜覆盖百分比高于超声洁治组( < 0.05),激光联合超声洁治组低于超声洁治组( < 0.05),活/死细菌染色显示单独激光治疗杀灭的细菌最多,其次是激光联合超声洁治,而单独超声洁治很少能杀灭细菌。单独激光治疗具有更好的杀菌效果,并且与单独超声洁治相比能清除更多生物膜,但清除成熟多物种生物膜的能力不足。激光联合超声洁治比单独超声洁治能清除更多生物膜和成熟多物种生物膜,并且在托槽表面的杀菌效果也优于单独超声洁治。

相似文献

1
The Biofilm Removal and Bactericidal Effect of an 810-nm High-Power Laser on an Orthodontic Bracket Surface: An In Vitro Study.810纳米高功率激光对正畸托槽表面的生物膜清除及杀菌作用:一项体外研究
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2024 Dec;42(12):779-788. doi: 10.1089/photob.2024.0088. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
2
Antimicrobial efficacy of self-locomotive manganese oxide nanozyme-doped diatom microbubbler on orthodontic brackets in vitro.自运动型二氧化锰纳米酶掺杂水螅微泡对体外正畸托槽的抗菌效果。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jan 20;23(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02739-z.
3
The bactericidal and biofilm removal effect of super reducing water on Streptococcus mutans in three types of orthodontic brackets.超还原水对三种正畸托槽中变形链球菌的杀菌及生物膜清除作用
J Oral Sci. 2023;65(1):48-52. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.22-0320.
4
Streptococcus mutans forms xylitol-resistant biofilm on excess adhesive flash in novel ex-vivo orthodontic bracket model.在新型体外正畸托槽模型中,变形链球菌在过量的粘结剂飞边(溢胶)上形成木糖醇抗性生物膜。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Apr;151(4):669-677. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2016.09.017.
5
Effect of blue light plus chlorhexidine therapy on Streptococcus mutans biofilm and its regrowth in an in vitro orthodontic model.蓝光联合洗必泰治疗对体外正畸模型中变形链球菌生物膜及其再生长的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022 Jan;161(1):103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.06.050. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
6
Effects of CO2 laser irradiation on tooth enamel coated with biofilm.二氧化碳激光照射对涂有生物膜的牙釉质的影响。
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Mar;46(3):216-23. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22218. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
7
Physico-mechanical and antimicrobial properties of an elastomeric ligature coated with reduced nanographene oxide-nano curcumin subjected to dual-modal photodynamic and photothermal inactivation against Streptococcus mutans biofilms.经还原的纳米氧化石墨烯-纳米姜黄素涂覆的弹性结扎线的物理力学和抗菌性能,用于双模式光动力和光热灭活致龋链球菌生物膜。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2023 Dec;44:103866. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103866. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
8
Comparison of the antimicrobial activity of Listerine and Corsodyl on orthodontic brackets in vitro.比较李施德林和考来素在体外对正畸托槽的抗菌活性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Oct;140(4):537-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.01.022.
9
Influence of orthodontic brackets design and surface properties on the cariogenic adhesion.正畸托槽设计及表面特性对致龋性黏附的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 May;34(4):321-327. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.03.008. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Shear bond strength, adhesive remnant index, and anti-biofilm effects of a photoexcited modified orthodontic adhesive containing curcumin doped poly lactic-co-glycolic acid nanoparticles: An ex-vivo biofilm model of S. mutans on the enamel slab bonded brackets.含姜黄素掺杂聚乳酸-乙醇酸纳米颗粒的光激发改性正畸粘合剂的剪切粘结强度、粘结残留指数及抗生物膜效果:变形链球菌在粘结于釉质块的托槽上的体外生物膜模型。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2020 Jun;30:101674. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101674. Epub 2020 Jan 26.