Prevalence of autonomic dysreflexia during spinal cord stimulation after spinal cord injury.

Over the past decade, clinical trials have shown that spinal cord stimulation can restore motor functions that were thought to be permanently impaired in persons with spinal cord injury. However, the off-target effects of delivering electrical impulses to intertwined spinal networks remain largely unknown. This generates safety concerns for this otherwise fast-progressing technology. Herein, we present the prevalence of autonomic dysreflexia (AD) that occurred during implanted spinal cord stimulation testing for motor activation of the lower extremities. Eleven participants with spinal cord injury underwent implantation of temporary percutaneous epidural and dorsal root ganglia stimulation leads. Participants completed two days of parameter testing at baseline, then six days of motor rehabilitation sessions, and two days of parameter testing at end of study. The goal of parameter testing was to determine electrode configuration(s), pulse amplitudes, and frequencies that activated lumbosacral spinal sensorimotor networks that generate lower extremity functions. During all parameter testing sessions, continuous blood pressure and heart rate monitoring recordings were collected. Evidence of autonomic dysreflexia was found in 22% of all parameter tests with participants at rest. Most of these episodes (97%) were asymptomatic. These episodes occurred more frequently when using epidural stimulation, at or near amplitudes that elicited whole leg muscle activation and using a wide-field electrode configuration. Although monitoring occurred during passive testing, motor rehabilitation sessions use stimulation for longer periods, at higher frequencies and amplitudes. These sessions may carry additional risks of autonomic dysreflexia. Investigation of these concerns should continue as spinal cord stimulation progresses toward clinical translation. Spinal cord stimulation for motor recovery after spinal cord injury is a popular research intervention, though off-target effects are a concern. Using continual blood pressure and heart rate recordings during passive spinal cord stimulation parameter testing, we identified frequent episodes of autonomic dysreflexia that were rarely associated with symptoms. This presents a previously unrecognized risk of spinal cord stimulation and appropriate vigilance in targeted monitoring is urged to maintain participant safety.