Suppr超能文献

在掩蔽词启动中分离FN400和N400事件相关电位成分。

Separating the FN400 and N400 event-related potential components in masked word priming.

作者信息

Leynes P Andrew, Verma Yashvi, Santos Alexandra

机构信息

The College of New Jersey, United States.

The College of New Jersey, United States.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 2024 Dec;182:106226. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106226. Epub 2024 Oct 22.

Abstract

Masked word repetition (priming) increases "old" responses on an episodic recognition test, which has been attributed to more fluent target processing. Such results hinge on comparisons to a control prime that is "fluency-neutral". A common practice is to use unrelated word primes for this purpose when some evidence suggests that they actually decrease target word processing fluency (disfluency). ERP and behavioral measures were collected in three experiments that used non-letter symbols as a fluency-neutral control and match primes to increase processing fluency. Experiment 1 compared unrelated word primes and orthographically dissimilar nonword primes to determine whether these primes cause disfluency. Experiment 2 contrasted orthographically dissimilar and similar nonword primes. Experiment 3 examined semantically related primes to test theoretical predictions derived from Experiments 1 and 2. All three experiments provide evidence that the FN400 and N400 are distinct ERP components because many primes altered only one of the components. Relative to the control condition, match (Exps 1 & 2) and semantic primes selectively affected N400 amplitudes, whereas unrelated word primes and orthographically dissimilar nonword primes selectively affected FN400 amplitudes. The Unexpected Fluency Attribution model (Mecklinger & Bader, 2020) provides a framework for understanding the cognitive processes associated with each ERP component.

摘要

掩蔽词重复(启动效应)会增加情景记忆识别测试中的“旧”反应,这归因于目标加工更加流畅。此类结果取决于与“流畅性中性”的对照启动刺激进行比较。一种常见做法是为此目的使用不相关的词启动刺激,尽管有一些证据表明它们实际上会降低目标词的加工流畅性(不流畅性)。在三个实验中收集了ERP和行为测量数据,这些实验使用非字母符号作为流畅性中性对照,并使用匹配启动刺激来提高加工流畅性。实验1比较了不相关的词启动刺激和正字法不同的非词启动刺激,以确定这些启动刺激是否会导致不流畅性。实验2对比了正字法不同和相似的非词启动刺激。实验3检验了语义相关的启动刺激,以测试从实验1和实验2得出的理论预测。所有三个实验都提供了证据,表明FN400和N400是不同的ERP成分,因为许多启动刺激只改变了其中一个成分。相对于对照条件,匹配(实验1和2)和语义启动刺激选择性地影响N400波幅,而不相关的词启动刺激和正字法不同的非词启动刺激选择性地影响FN400波幅。意外流畅性归因模型(梅克林格和巴德,2020)为理解与每个ERP成分相关的认知过程提供了一个框架。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验