Suppr超能文献

一项关于急性肩关节脱位评估与治疗的系统评价和荟萃分析的伞状综述。

An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessment and treatment of acute shoulder dislocation.

作者信息

Gonai Shiro, Miyoshi Takahiro, da Silva Lopes Katharina, Gilmour Stuart

机构信息

St. Luke's International University Graduate School of Public Health, 3-6-2 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Emergency Department, Asao General Hospital, 6-25-1 Kamiasao, Asao-ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jan;87:16-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.09.060. Epub 2024 Oct 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence on accurate and rapid diagnostic methods, effective and safe shoulder dislocation reduction techniques, pharmacological treatment, and post-reduction care for acute anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature up to December 31, 2022, with an additional search conducted up to August 31, 2024. Databases searched included Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, DARE, PROSPERO, OpenGrey, and Google Scholar. We reviewed systematic reviews and meta-analyses on assessment and intervention for acute anterior shoulder dislocation. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the GRADE approach, while the methodology was assessed using AMSTAR 2.

RESULTS

From an initial 1345 records, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 4 articles on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), 5 on analgesia and anesthesia, 3 on closed reduction techniques, 10 on surgical Bankart repair, 9 comparing external and internal rotation immobilization, and 1 on nerve injuries, including duplicates. POCUS demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy comparable to radiography for shoulder dislocations and associated fractures. Analgesia and anesthesia studies showed that intra-articular anesthesia (IAA) is as effective as intravenous sedation (IVS) with fewer adverse events and shorter ED stays. Three meta-analyses on closed reduction techniques revealed no significant differences in success rates among various methods, but the FARES method was noted for superior pain management. Ten reviews on surgical Bankart repair consistently showed reduced redislocation rates, especially in younger patients, compared to non-surgical treatments including internal and external rotation immobilization. Four recent reviews reported external rotation immobilization was more effective than internal rotation in preventing redislocations. Nerve injuries were common, with the axillary nerve most frequently affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Emergency physicians managing anterior shoulder dislocation should employ POCUS for diagnosis, prioritize intra-articular anesthesia, master various reduction techniques including the FARES method, refer patients to an orthopedic surgeon for follow-up and potential surgery to prevent redislocation, and be vigilant about nerve damage.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在全面综述目前有关急诊科急性前肩关节脱位准确快速诊断方法、有效安全的肩关节脱位复位技术、药物治疗及复位后护理的证据。

方法

我们对截至2022年12月31日的文献进行了系统综述,并于2024年8月31日进行了额外检索。检索的数据库包括Cochrane系统评价数据库、MEDLINE、Embase、CINAHL、DARE、PROSPERO、OpenGrey和谷歌学术。我们回顾了关于急性前肩关节脱位评估和干预的系统评价和荟萃分析。数据提取和质量评估由两名评审员独立进行。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具和GRADE方法评估证据质量,同时使用AMSTAR 2评估方法。

结果

从最初的1345条记录中,有30项研究符合纳入标准。其中包括4篇关于床旁超声(POCUS)的文章、5篇关于镇痛和麻醉的文章、3篇关于闭合复位技术的文章、10篇关于手术Bankart修复的文章、9篇比较外旋和内旋固定的文章以及1篇关于神经损伤的文章,包括重复文章。POCUS显示出与肩部脱位及相关骨折的X线摄影相当的高诊断准确性。镇痛和麻醉研究表明,关节内麻醉(IAA)与静脉镇静(IVS)效果相当,不良事件更少,急诊科停留时间更短。三项关于闭合复位技术的荟萃分析显示,各种方法的成功率无显著差异,但FARES方法在疼痛管理方面表现出色。十篇关于手术Bankart修复的综述一致表明,与包括外旋和内旋固定在内的非手术治疗相比,再脱位率降低,尤其是在年轻患者中。最近的四项综述报告,外旋固定在预防再脱位方面比内旋更有效。神经损伤很常见,腋神经最常受影响。

结论

处理前肩关节脱位的急诊科医生应采用POCUS进行诊断,优先选择关节内麻醉,掌握包括FARES方法在内的各种复位技术,将患者转诊给骨科医生进行随访和可能的手术以预防再脱位,并警惕神经损伤。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验