• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人日间照料项目及其对痴呆症患者和照护者的影响(ADAPT-DemCare):一项关于如何及为何的真实主义综合研究,旨在构建项目理论

Adult day programs and their effects on individuals with dementia and their caregivers (ADAPT-DemCare): a realist synthesis to develop program theories on the how and why.

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Alzheimer Society of York Region, Aurora, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 23;13(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02683-1.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-024-02683-1
PMID:39443968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11515670/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adult day programs aim to facilitate aging in place by supporting the health and well-being of persons with dementia and providing respite to their caregivers. However, studies on the effects of day programs are inconclusive, and we especially lack insights into the context conditions and mechanisms of day programs that may produce different outcomes for different groups of persons with dementia and their caregivers. Our objective was to conduct a realist review, synthesizing research on day programs to develop program theories explaining how and why day programs do or do not produce positive or negative outcomes for different groups of persons with dementia, and caregivers.

METHODS

We identified 14 literature reviews (including 329 references published between 1975 and 2021) on adult day programs. From this initial pool of studies, we will include those that focused on day program attendees with dementia or meaningful cognitive impairment, and/or their caregivers, and that report how day program contexts (C) and mechanisms (M) bring about outcomes (O) for attendees and caregivers. We will extract CMO statements (i.e., narratives that explain how and why day programs do or do not bring about certain outcomes for whom and under what circumstances). Using additional focused searches, citation mapping, citation tracking, and discussions with our researcher and expert team members, we will identify additional references. CMO statements will be synthesized, transformed into hypotheses, and linked and visualized to form program theories. Using focus groups and the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership method, we will discuss and prioritize our CMO statements and refine our program theories with 32 experts (older adults, caregivers, Alzheimer societies, caregiver organizations, day program staff and managers, and health system and policy decision makers).

DISCUSSION

By identifying essential elements and processes of day programs and related knowledge gaps, this study will generate much-needed knowledge to leverage the full potential of day programs so they can provide appropriate care, preventing premature institutionalization, and unnecessary acute and primary care use. This will ultimately improve the quality of life of persons with dementia and their caregivers, alleviate caregiver burden, and reduce social costs.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024504030.

摘要

背景

成人日间照料项目旨在通过支持痴呆症患者的健康和福祉,为其护理人员提供喘息机会,从而促进他们在家中安度晚年。然而,关于日间照料项目效果的研究尚无定论,我们尤其缺乏对日间照料项目的背景条件和机制的深入了解,而这些机制可能会为不同类型的痴呆症患者及其护理人员带来不同的结果。我们的目标是进行一项实际主义综述,综合研究日间照料项目,以制定项目理论,解释日间照料项目如何以及为何为不同类型的痴呆症患者及其护理人员带来积极或消极的结果。

方法

我们确定了 14 篇关于成人日间照料项目的文献综述(包括 1975 年至 2021 年期间发表的 329 篇参考文献)。从这个初步的研究池中,我们将纳入那些专注于日间照料项目参与者(患有痴呆症或有意义的认知障碍)及其护理人员,并报告日间照料项目的背景(C)和机制(M)如何为参与者和护理人员带来结果(O)的研究。我们将提取 CMO 陈述(即解释日间照料项目如何以及为何为特定人群在特定情况下带来特定结果的叙述)。通过额外的重点搜索、引文映射、引文跟踪以及与我们的研究人员和专家团队成员的讨论,我们将确定其他参考文献。CMO 陈述将被综合,转化为假设,并链接和可视化,以形成项目理论。通过焦点小组和詹姆斯·林德联盟优先事项设定伙伴关系方法,我们将与 32 位专家(老年人、护理人员、阿尔茨海默病协会、护理人员组织、日间照料项目工作人员和管理人员以及卫生系统和政策决策者)讨论并确定我们的 CMO 陈述的优先级,并完善我们的项目理论。

讨论

通过确定日间照料项目的基本要素和过程以及相关的知识空白,本研究将产生急需的知识,以充分发挥日间照料项目的潜力,为他们提供适当的护理,防止过早住院和不必要的急性和初级保健使用。这最终将提高痴呆症患者及其护理人员的生活质量,减轻护理人员的负担,并降低社会成本。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42024504030。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260b/11515670/06743d00bb1f/13643_2024_2683_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260b/11515670/06743d00bb1f/13643_2024_2683_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/260b/11515670/06743d00bb1f/13643_2024_2683_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adult day programs and their effects on individuals with dementia and their caregivers (ADAPT-DemCare): a realist synthesis to develop program theories on the how and why.成人日间照料项目及其对痴呆症患者和照护者的影响(ADAPT-DemCare):一项关于如何及为何的真实主义综合研究,旨在构建项目理论
Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 23;13(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02683-1.
2
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
3
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
4
Reducing refusals of care through improved personal care interactions between caregivers and people with dementia: protocol for a realist synthesis.通过改善护理人员与痴呆症患者之间的个人护理互动来减少护理拒绝:一项现实主义综合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 28;14(8):e088149. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088149.
5
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an in-home respite care program in supporting informal caregivers of people with dementia: design of a comparative study.一项居家喘息护理项目在支持痴呆症患者非正式照料者方面的有效性和成本效益:一项比较研究的设计
BMC Geriatr. 2016 Dec 2;16(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s12877-016-0373-4.
6
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
7
8
9
The Going to Stay at Home program: combining dementia caregiver training and residential respite care.“留守在家”计划:将痴呆症护理人员培训与住宅暂托护理相结合。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2018 Nov;30(11):1697-1706. doi: 10.1017/S1041610218000686. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the impact of day programs on individuals living with dementia and their family/friend caregivers (AIDA-DemCare): protocol of a prospective cohort study combined with a qualitative evaluation.评估日间项目对痴呆症患者及其家庭/朋友照顾者的影响(AIDA-DemCare):一项结合定性评估的前瞻性队列研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;25(1):2846. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23896-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A roadmap to realist interviews in health professions education research: Recommendations based on a critical analysis.健康职业教育研究中现实主义访谈路线图:基于批判性分析的建议
Med Educ. 2024 Jun;58(6):697-712. doi: 10.1111/medu.15270. Epub 2023 Dec 11.
2
2023 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.2023 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Apr;19(4):1598-1695. doi: 10.1002/alz.13016. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
Applying and reporting relevance, richness and rigour in realist evidence appraisals: Advancing key concepts in realist reviews.
在真实主义评价中应用和报告相关性、丰富性和严谨性:推进真实主义综述的关键概念。
Res Synth Methods. 2023 May;14(3):504-514. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1630. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
4
Factors Influencing Older Persons' Transitions to Facility-Based Care Settings: A Scoping Review.影响老年人转入机构护理环境的因素:范围综述。
Gerontologist. 2023 Aug 24;63(7):1211-1227. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnac091.
5
The health impacts of place-based creative programmes on older adults' health: A critical realist review.基于场所的创意项目对老年人健康的影响:批判性现实主义综述。
Health Place. 2022 Jul;76:102839. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102839. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Adult Day Service Use Among Minority Older Adults: Facilitators, Barriers, and Outcomes From an Updated Integrative Literature Review Between 2010 to 2021.成人日间服务在少数族裔老年人中的使用:2010 年至 2021 年更新的综合文献综述中的促进因素、障碍和结果。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 Oct;41(10):2253-2263. doi: 10.1177/07334648221106772. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
7
Global and regional spending on dementia care from 2000-2019 and expected future health spending scenarios from 2020-2050: An economic modelling exercise.2000年至2019年全球及地区痴呆症护理支出以及2020年至2050年预期未来医疗支出情景:一项经济建模分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Mar 13;45:101337. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101337. eCollection 2022 Mar.
8
Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.2019 年全球痴呆症患病率估计及 2050 年预测患病率:2019 年全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e105-e125. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
9
Caregiving Burden Among Caregivers of People With Dementia Through the Lens of Intersectionality.从交叉性视角看痴呆症患者照顾者的照顾负担。
Gerontologist. 2022 May 26;62(5):650-661. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab146.
10
What is the impact of day care on older people with long-term conditions: A systematic review.日托对患有长期疾病的老年人有何影响:一项系统综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2021 Sep;29(5):1201-1221. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13245. Epub 2020 Dec 17.