• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risk stratification in breast screening workshop.乳腺筛查中的风险分层研讨会
BMC Proc. 2024 Oct 24;18(Suppl 19):22. doi: 10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0.
2
3
Defining the optimum strategy for identifying adults and children with coeliac disease: systematic review and economic modelling.定义识别成人和儿童乳糜泻的最佳策略:系统评价和经济建模。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Oct;26(44):1-310. doi: 10.3310/ZUCE8371.
4
5
What are the benefits and harms of risk stratified screening as part of the NHS breast screening Programme? Study protocol for a multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).风险分层筛查作为国民保健制度乳房筛查计划的一部分有哪些益处和危害?BC-predict 与常规筛查的多中心非随机比较研究方案(NCT04359420)。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 18;20(1):570. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-07054-2.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Screening for the primary prevention of fragility fractures among adults aged 40 years and older in primary care: systematic reviews of the effects and acceptability of screening and treatment, and the accuracy of risk prediction tools.40 岁及以上成年人在初级保健中进行脆性骨折一级预防的筛查:筛查和治疗效果及可接受性以及风险预测工具准确性的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 21;12(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02181-w.
8
Prognostic tools for identification of high risk in people with Crohn's disease: systematic review and cost-effectiveness study.用于识别克罗恩病高危人群的预后工具:系统评价和成本效益研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 Mar;25(23):1-138. doi: 10.3310/hta25230.
9
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
10

本文引用的文献

1
A structured process for the validation of a decision-analytic model: application to a cost-effectiveness model for risk-stratified national breast screening.一种决策分析模型验证的结构化流程:在风险分层国家乳腺癌筛查成本效益模型中的应用。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2024 Jul;22(4):527-542. doi: 10.1007/s40258-024-00887-z. Epub 2024 May 16.
2
Population screening requires robust evidence-genomics is no exception.人群筛查需要有力的证据——基因组学也不例外。
Lancet. 2024 Feb 10;403(10426):583-586. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02295-X. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
3
The cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified breast cancer screening in the UK.英国风险分层乳腺癌筛查的成本效益。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Nov;129(11):1801-1809. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02461-1. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
4
Estimating the Cost of 3 Risk Prediction Strategies for Potential Use in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.估算三种风险预测策略在英国国家乳腺癌筛查计划中潜在应用的成本。
MDM Policy Pract. 2023 May 4;8(1):23814683231171363. doi: 10.1177/23814683231171363. eCollection 2023 Jan-Jun.
5
Progress and Remaining Gaps in the Early Detection and Treatment of Breast Cancer.乳腺癌早期检测和治疗的进展及尚存差距。
Curr Oncol. 2023 Mar 8;30(3):3201-3205. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30030242.
6
Long-Term Performance of an Image-Based Short-Term Risk Model for Breast Cancer.基于影像的乳腺癌短期风险模型的长期性能。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 10;41(14):2536-2545. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01564. Epub 2023 Mar 17.
7
Psychological impact of risk-stratified screening as part of the NHS Breast Screening Programme: multi-site non-randomised comparison of BC-Predict versus usual screening (NCT04359420).NHS 乳腺癌筛查项目中风险分层筛查的心理影响:BC-Predict 与常规筛查的多中心非随机比较(NCT04359420)。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Apr;128(8):1548-1558. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02156-7. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
8
Prospective validation of the BOADICEA multifactorial breast cancer risk prediction model in a large prospective cohort study.前瞻性验证 BOADICEA 多因素乳腺癌风险预测模型在大型前瞻性队列研究中的应用。
J Med Genet. 2022 Dec;59(12):1196-1205. doi: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108806. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
9
Enhancing the BOADICEA cancer risk prediction model to incorporate new data on , , updates to tumour pathology and cancer incidence.增强 BOADICEA 癌症风险预测模型,纳入新的数据、、更新的肿瘤病理学和癌症发病率数据。
J Med Genet. 2022 Dec;59(12):1206-1218. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2022-108471. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
10
Differences in cancer incidence by broad ethnic group in England, 2013-2017.2013-2017 年英格兰按广泛族裔划分的癌症发病率差异。
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jun;126(12):1765-1773. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01718-5. Epub 2022 Mar 2.

乳腺筛查中的风险分层研讨会

Risk stratification in breast screening workshop.

作者信息

Anderson Andrew, Visintin Cristina, Antoniou Antonis, Pashayan Nora, Gilbert Fiona J, Hackshaw Allan, Bhatt Rikesh, Hill Harry, Wright Stuart, Payne Katherine, Rogers Gabriel, Shinkins Bethany, Taylor-Phillips Sian, Given-Wilson Rosalind

机构信息

UK NSC secretariat, Sheffield/London, UK.

University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

BMC Proc. 2024 Oct 24;18(Suppl 19):22. doi: 10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0
PMID:39444025
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11500431/
Abstract

Population screening for breast cancer (BC) is currently offered in the UK for women aged 50 to 71 with the aim of reducing mortality. There is additional screening within the national programme for women identified as having a very high risk of BC. There is growing interest in further risk stratification in breast screening, which would require a whole population risk assessment and the subsequent offer of screening tailored to the individual's risk. Some women would be offered more intensive screening than others or no screening. This might provide a better balance of screening benefits and harms for each individual than the current population age-based programme alone. The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is considering using decision-analytic and other models to evaluate different risk stratification screening strategies and identify remaining gaps in evidence. This paper reports the proceedings of a UK NSC workshop where experts in the field discussed both risk prediction models, as well as decision-analytic models providing a benefit-harm analysis/economic evaluation of risk-stratified screening programmes (see Table 1). The aim of the meeting was to present and discuss the current work of experts, including some data which had not been published at the time of the meeting, to inform the UK NSC. The workshop was not intended to present a balanced evaluation of how to deliver screening in future. Areas for further work identified included methods for comparing models to assess accuracy, the optimum risk assessment tools, the digital screening infrastructure, acceptability of stratification, choice of screening test and reducing inequalities. A move to risk stratification of the whole programme would require a careful phased introduction with continuing assessment of real-world evidence during deployment.

摘要

目前,英国为年龄在50至71岁之间的女性提供乳腺癌(BC)群体筛查,目的是降低死亡率。在国家项目中,还为被确定为乳腺癌高危的女性提供额外筛查。在乳腺癌筛查中,对进一步的风险分层的兴趣日益浓厚,这将需要对整个人口进行风险评估,并随后根据个人风险提供量身定制的筛查。一些女性将接受比其他女性更密集的筛查,或者不接受筛查。与仅基于当前人口年龄的项目相比,这可能会为每个人提供更好的筛查益处与危害的平衡。英国国家筛查委员会(UK NSC)正在考虑使用决策分析模型和其他模型来评估不同的风险分层筛查策略,并找出证据方面的剩余差距。本文报告了UK NSC一次研讨会的会议记录,该领域的专家在会上讨论了风险预测模型以及提供风险分层筛查项目益处-危害分析/经济评估的决策分析模型(见表1)。会议的目的是介绍和讨论专家们目前的工作,包括一些在会议召开时尚未发表的数据,以便为UK NSC提供信息。该研讨会并非旨在对未来如何开展筛查进行全面评估。确定的进一步工作领域包括比较模型以评估准确性的方法、最佳风险评估工具、数字筛查基础设施、分层的可接受性、筛查测试的选择以及减少不平等。转向整个项目的风险分层需要谨慎地分阶段引入,并在实施过程中持续评估实际证据。