Department of Methodology & Statistics, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Department of Methodology & Statistics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Res Synth Methods. 2024 Nov;15(6):1231-1243. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1765. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
The product Bayes factor (PBF) synthesizes evidence for an informative hypothesis across heterogeneous replication studies. It can be used when fixed- or random effects meta-analysis fall short. For example, when effect sizes are incomparable and cannot be pooled, or when studies diverge significantly in the populations, study designs, and measures used. PBF shines as a solution for small sample meta-analyses, where the number of between-study differences is often large relative to the number of studies, precluding the use of meta-regression to account for these differences. Users should be mindful of the fact that the PBF answers a qualitatively different research question than other evidence synthesis methods. For example, whereas fixed-effect meta-analysis estimates the size of a population effect, the PBF quantifies to what extent an informative hypothesis is supported in all included studies. This tutorial paper showcases the user-friendly PBF functionality within the bain R-package. This new implementation of an existing method was validated using a simulation study, available in an Online Supplement. Results showed that PBF had a high overall accuracy, due to greater sensitivity and lower specificity, compared to random-effects meta-analysis, individual participant data meta-analysis, and vote counting. Tutorials demonstrate applications of the method on meta-analytic and individual participant data. The example datasets, based on published research, are included in bain so readers can reproduce the examples and apply the code to their own data. The PBF is a promising method for synthesizing evidence for informative hypotheses across conceptual replications that are not suitable for conventional meta-analysis.
贝叶斯因子(PBF)综合了来自异构重复研究的信息性假设的证据。当固定或随机效应荟萃分析不适用时,可以使用 PBF。例如,当效应大小不可比且无法合并,或者研究在人群、研究设计和使用的测量方法上存在显著差异时。PBF 是小样本荟萃分析的理想选择,因为研究之间的差异数量相对于研究数量通常较大,排除了使用元回归来解释这些差异。用户应该注意到,PBF 回答的是一个与其他证据综合方法定性不同的研究问题。例如,固定效应荟萃分析估计了总体效应的大小,而 PBF 则量化了在所有纳入的研究中,信息性假设得到了多大程度的支持。本教程论文展示了 bain R 包中用户友好的 PBF 功能。这种现有方法的新实现通过在线补充中提供的模拟研究进行了验证。结果表明,与随机效应荟萃分析、个体参与者数据荟萃分析和投票计数相比,PBF 的整体准确性较高,这是由于其敏感性更高,特异性更低。教程展示了该方法在荟萃分析和个体参与者数据中的应用。基于已发表研究的示例数据集包含在 bain 中,以便读者可以重现示例并将代码应用于自己的数据。PBF 是一种有前途的方法,可用于综合信息性假设的证据,这些假设在不适合常规荟萃分析的概念重复中是适用的。