Dieudonne Maniragaba, Lv Renguang, Xie Wenjie, Liu Qi, Jiang Jianwu, Fu Yang
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Gastrointestinal Surgery Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Front Surg. 2024 Oct 9;11:1385754. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1385754. eCollection 2024.
The incidence of gastric cancer is concomitantly rising with gastric cardia cancer worldwide. While the improvement of gastric cancer surgical techniques is glowing, this study assesses the impact of the upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate for gastric cardia cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG) or laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy(LATG).
A total of 63 patients with gastric cardia cancer who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy were retro-prospectively collected from January 2021 to May 2023. While assessing the impact of upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate, esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler has been compared to a circular stapler.
The sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria; 32 (51%) underwent LATG and 31 (49%) underwent TLTG. Their mean age was 65 years (range, 45-77). The blood loss means in LATG and TLTG was 74.69 and 50.16 ml, respectively (), and surgery duration was higher in LATG than LATG with respective means of 247 min and 222.42 min. (). However, the tumor size means (), and upper margin length means () were not significantly different in the LATG and TLTG groups, respectively. The number of resected and assessed lymph node was adequate in the LATG and TLTG groups. The current study still does not find an independent related risk from the upper margin length and tumor size to the survival rate according to the multiple regression analysis ().
The upper margin length and tumor size do not have a relationship with the survival rate of the compared esophagojejunostomy (EJS) methods. The EJS using a linear stapler requires a shorter surgery duration and less blood loss than EJS using a circular stapler.
在全球范围内,胃癌的发病率与贲门癌的发病率同步上升。尽管胃癌手术技术不断进步,但本研究评估了上切缘长度和肿瘤大小对接受全腹腔镜全胃切除术(TLTG)或腹腔镜辅助全胃切除术(LATG)的贲门癌患者生存率的影响。
回顾性收集2021年1月至2023年5月期间接受腹腔镜全胃切除术的63例贲门癌患者。在评估上切缘长度和肿瘤大小对生存率的影响时,将使用直线切割吻合器进行食管空肠吻合与圆形吻合器进行了比较。
63例患者符合纳入标准;32例(51%)接受了LATG,31例(49%)接受了TLTG。他们的平均年龄为65岁(范围45 - 77岁)。LATG和TLTG的平均失血量分别为74.69毫升和50.16毫升(),LATG的手术时间比TLTG长,分别为247分钟和222.42分钟()。然而,LATG组和TLTG组的肿瘤大小均值()和上切缘长度均值()分别无显著差异。LATG组和TLTG组切除及评估的淋巴结数量充足。根据多元回归分析(),本研究仍未发现上切缘长度和肿瘤大小与生存率之间存在独立相关风险。
上切缘长度和肿瘤大小与所比较的食管空肠吻合术(EJS)方法的生存率无关。与使用圆形吻合器的EJS相比,使用直线切割吻合器的EJS手术时间更短,失血量更少。