Suppr超能文献

高频瑜伽呼吸、呼吸觉察和安静休息期间的中潜伏期听觉诱发电位。

Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Response during High-frequency Yoga Breathing, Breath Awareness, and Quiet Rest.

作者信息

Telles Shirley, Chetry Dipak, Balkrishna Acharya

机构信息

Division of Yoga and Clinical Neurophysiology, University of Patanjali, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India.

Department of Yoga Research, University of Patanjali, Haridwar, Uttarakhand, India.

出版信息

Int J Yoga. 2024 May-Aug;17(2):101-105. doi: 10.4103/ijoy.ijoy_225_23. Epub 2024 Sep 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Yoga breathing influences cortical activity and, hence, cortico-efferent sensory activity. Previously, slow yoga breathing influenced the components of mid-latency auditory evoked potentials.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aimed to compare middle latency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEPs) recorded during (i) High-frequency yoga breathing (HFYB), (ii) Breath awareness (BAW), and (iii) Quiet rest (QR) as a control in experienced yoga practitioners.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MLAEPs were recorded before, during, and after the practice of HFYB compared to an equal duration of BAW and QR in 22 university students whose ages ranged from 18 to 28 years, recorded from the vertex referenced to linked earlobes and the ground electrode on forehead.

RESULTS

The peak amplitude of the Pa wave was significantly increased during HFYB compared to before HFYB (repeated measures ANOVA, analysis with least significant difference, < 0.05). During BAW, the peak amplitude of the Na wave was significantly increased compared to before BAW ( < 0.05). During QR, the peak latency of "Pa" and "Nb" waves was significantly increased compared to before QR ( < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest that changes in MLAEPs during HFYB, BAW, and QR were different and distinct. Both interventional sessions appear to increase the recruitment of neural resources in the primary auditory cortex, whereas QR appears to slow transmission within the thalamic reticular projection to the cortex. Generalizing the findings is restricted by the sample being confined to male experienced practitioners of yoga breathing.

摘要

背景

瑜伽呼吸会影响皮层活动,进而影响皮层传出感觉活动。此前,慢瑜伽呼吸会影响中潜伏期听觉诱发电位的成分。

目的

本研究旨在比较在高频瑜伽呼吸(HFYB)、呼吸觉知(BAW)和安静休息(QR,作为对照)期间,有经验的瑜伽练习者记录的中潜伏期听觉诱发电位(MLAEPs)。

材料与方法

在22名年龄在18至28岁的大学生中,将HFYB练习前、练习期间和练习后的MLAEPs与相同持续时间的BAW和QR期间记录的MLAEPs进行比较,记录电极置于头顶,参考双耳耳垂,前额接地。

结果

与HFYB练习前相比,HFYB期间Pa波的峰值振幅显著增加(重复测量方差分析,最小显著差异分析,P<0.05)。在BAW期间,与BAW练习前相比,Na波的峰值振幅显著增加(P<0.05)。在QR期间,与QR练习前相比,“Pa”和“Nb”波的峰值潜伏期显著增加(P<0.01)。

结论

研究结果表明,HFYB、BAW和QR期间MLAEPs的变化是不同且有差异的。两种干预过程似乎都增加了初级听觉皮层神经资源的募集,而QR似乎减缓了丘脑网状投射到皮层的传输。由于样本仅限于有经验的男性瑜伽呼吸练习者,这些发现的推广受到限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24ba/11495306/f6634254d168/IJY-17-101-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验