• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detection of Perineural Spread in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.对比增强磁共振成像检测头颈部癌神经周围扩散的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023 Dec 22;85(Suppl 2):e97-e109. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777793. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Diagnostic Accuracy of MRI in Detecting the Perineural Spread of Head and Neck Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.MRI对头颈部肿瘤神经周围扩散的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jan 4;14(1):113. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14010113.
3
Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.与缺血性心肌病当前现有检测途径相比,心脏磁共振成像成本效益的系统评价与建模
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Sep;18(59):1-120. doi: 10.3310/hta18590.
4
Ultrasound, CT, MRI, or PET-CT for staging and re-staging of adults with cutaneous melanoma.超声、CT、MRI或PET-CT用于成人皮肤黑色素瘤的分期及再分期。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 1;7(7):CD012806. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012806.pub2.
5
The sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution imaging in evaluating perineural spread of adenoid cystic carcinoma to the skull base.高分辨率成像在评估腺样囊性癌向颅底神经周围扩散中的敏感性和特异性。
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Jun;133(6):541-5. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.6.541.
6
Does PET scan have any role in the diagnosis of perineural spread associated with the head and neck tumors?PET 扫描在诊断头颈部肿瘤相关的神经周围扩散中有什么作用吗?
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2022 Aug;31(8):827-835. doi: 10.17219/acem/147359.
7
Head-to-head comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI for assessing pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis.对比增强乳腺摄影与对比增强 MRI 对头评估乳腺癌患者新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Nov;202(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07034-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
8
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 29 Studies Predicting Diagnostic Accuracy of CT, MRI, PET, and USG in Detecting Extracapsular Spread in Head and Neck Cancers.一项对29项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析:预测CT、MRI、PET和超声检查对头颈部癌症包膜外扩散的诊断准确性
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Apr 10;16(8):1457. doi: 10.3390/cancers16081457.
9
Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer.用于检测前列腺癌的前列腺磁共振成像(MRI),无论是否进行MRI靶向活检及系统活检。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2.
10
Magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance arthrography and ultrasonography for assessing rotator cuff tears in people with shoulder pain for whom surgery is being considered.磁共振成像、磁共振关节造影和超声检查用于评估考虑手术治疗的肩部疼痛患者的肩袖撕裂情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 24;2013(9):CD009020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009020.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of peri-neural invasion in oral cancer patients using MRI: A clinical and radiologic correlation study.使用磁共振成像评估口腔癌患者的神经周围侵犯:一项临床与影像学相关性研究。
Bioinformation. 2025 May 31;21(5):1118-1122. doi: 10.6026/973206300211118. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Survival outcomes of perineural spread in head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma.头颈部皮肤鳞状细胞癌神经周围侵犯的生存结果。
ANZ J Surg. 2022 Sep;92(9):2299-2304. doi: 10.1111/ans.17908. Epub 2022 Jul 22.
2
Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental materials: a systematic review.磁共振成像中由牙科材料引起的伪影:系统评价。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Sep 1;51(6):20210450. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20210450. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
3
Facial nerve perineural spread from cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A single institution analysis of epidemiology, treatment, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors.头颈部皮肤鳞状细胞癌的面神经神经周扩散:单机构的流行病学、治疗、生存结果和预后因素分析。
Head Neck. 2022 May;44(5):1223-1236. doi: 10.1002/hed.27017. Epub 2022 Feb 27.
4
Mimics of perineural tumor spread in the head and neck.头颈部神经周围肿瘤扩散的模拟。
Br J Radiol. 2021 Dec;94(1128):20210099. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210099. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
5
Perineural spread in head and neck malignancies: imaging findings - an updated literature review.头颈部恶性肿瘤的神经周围扩散:影像学表现——最新文献回顾。
Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022 Feb 1;22(1):22-38. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.5897.
6
Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.正畸矫治器与磁共振成像伪影:一项使用1.5-T和3-T扫描仪的探索性体外和体内研究。
Imaging Sci Dent. 2021 Mar;51(1):63-71. doi: 10.5624/isd.20200199. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Comparison of diffusion-weighted MR imaging and F Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in detection of residual or recurrent tumors and delineation of their local spread after (chemo) radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.比较弥散加权磁共振成像和 F 氟脱氧葡萄糖 PET/CT 在头颈部鳞状细胞癌放化疗后检测残留或复发性肿瘤及局部扩散中的应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 Sep;130:109157. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109157. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
8
High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: Risk Factors for Recurrence and Impact of Adjuvant Treatment.头颈部高危皮肤鳞状细胞癌:复发的危险因素和辅助治疗的影响。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Jan;131(1):E136-E143. doi: 10.1002/lary.28564. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
9
Correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histopathological parameters of salivary gland cancer.唾液腺癌表观扩散系数与组织病理学参数的相关性。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Aug;48(8):995-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.897. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
10
Evaluating Perineural Spread to the Intratemporal Facial Nerve on Magnetic Resonance Imaging.评估磁共振成像中面神经颞骨内段的神经周围播散。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun;160(6):1087-1094. doi: 10.1177/0194599819827848. Epub 2019 Feb 5.

对比增强磁共振成像检测头颈部癌神经周围扩散的诊断准确性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析

Diagnostic Accuracy of Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Detection of Perineural Spread in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Sharma Pranav, Ajjikuttira Aiyapa, Malacova Eva, Gillespie Jennifer

机构信息

Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023 Dec 22;85(Suppl 2):e97-e109. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777793. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1777793
PMID:39444772
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495904/
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for the detection of perineural spread (PNS) in head and neck cancer patients.  A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to May 20, 2022. We included diagnostic accuracy studies that used CE-MRI for the diagnosis of PNS in patients with head and neck cancer, using histopathology from surgical specimens as the reference standard. Potential bias and applicability of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADUS-2) tool. Pooled joint effect sizes of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by applying bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model.  Nine studies with 259 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRI for detecting PNS were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73-96) and 83% (95% CI: 73-90), respectively. Stratifying by MRI strength, 1.5 T had a higher sensitivity of 97% (95% CI: 47-100) compared with 3 T, which had a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 72-90). Both 1.5- and 3-T MRI had a similar specificity in detecting PNS of 85% (95% CI: 63-95) and 84% (95% CI: 75-91), respectively.  CE-MRI provides good diagnostic test accuracy for the detection of PNS in head and neck cancer. Current evidence suggests 1.5-T MRI provides greater sensitivity compared with 3-T MRI.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)对头颈部癌患者神经周围扩散(PNS)检测的诊断准确性。

截至2022年5月20日,对PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了系统综述。我们纳入了使用CE-MRI诊断头颈部癌患者PNS的诊断准确性研究,以手术标本的组织病理学作为参考标准。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADUS-2)工具评估纳入研究的潜在偏倚和适用性。应用双变量随机效应荟萃分析模型计算敏感性和特异性的合并联合效应量。

纳入了9项研究,共259例患者。CE-MRI检测PNS的合并敏感性和特异性分别为89%(95%置信区间[CI]:73-96)和83%(95%CI:73-90)。按MRI强度分层,1.5T的敏感性为97%(95%CI:47-100),高于3T,3T的敏感性为83%(95%CI:72-90)。1.5T和3T MRI在检测PNS方面的特异性相似,分别为85%(95%CI:63-95)和84%(95%CI:75-91)。

CE-MRI对头颈部癌患者PNS的检测具有良好的诊断测试准确性。目前的证据表明,与3T MRI相比,1.5T MRI具有更高的敏感性。