Sharma Pranav, Ajjikuttira Aiyapa, Malacova Eva, Gillespie Jennifer
Department of Medical Imaging, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2023 Dec 22;85(Suppl 2):e97-e109. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1777793. eCollection 2024 Oct.
The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) for the detection of perineural spread (PNS) in head and neck cancer patients. A systematic review of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to May 20, 2022. We included diagnostic accuracy studies that used CE-MRI for the diagnosis of PNS in patients with head and neck cancer, using histopathology from surgical specimens as the reference standard. Potential bias and applicability of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADUS-2) tool. Pooled joint effect sizes of sensitivity and specificity were calculated by applying bivariate random-effects meta-analysis model. Nine studies with 259 patients were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of CE-MRI for detecting PNS were 89% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 73-96) and 83% (95% CI: 73-90), respectively. Stratifying by MRI strength, 1.5 T had a higher sensitivity of 97% (95% CI: 47-100) compared with 3 T, which had a sensitivity of 83% (95% CI: 72-90). Both 1.5- and 3-T MRI had a similar specificity in detecting PNS of 85% (95% CI: 63-95) and 84% (95% CI: 75-91), respectively. CE-MRI provides good diagnostic test accuracy for the detection of PNS in head and neck cancer. Current evidence suggests 1.5-T MRI provides greater sensitivity compared with 3-T MRI.
本研究的目的是确定对比增强磁共振成像(CE-MRI)对头颈部癌患者神经周围扩散(PNS)检测的诊断准确性。
截至2022年5月20日,对PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了系统综述。我们纳入了使用CE-MRI诊断头颈部癌患者PNS的诊断准确性研究,以手术标本的组织病理学作为参考标准。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估2(QUADUS-2)工具评估纳入研究的潜在偏倚和适用性。应用双变量随机效应荟萃分析模型计算敏感性和特异性的合并联合效应量。
纳入了9项研究,共259例患者。CE-MRI检测PNS的合并敏感性和特异性分别为89%(95%置信区间[CI]:73-96)和83%(95%CI:73-90)。按MRI强度分层,1.5T的敏感性为97%(95%CI:47-100),高于3T,3T的敏感性为83%(95%CI:72-90)。1.5T和3T MRI在检测PNS方面的特异性相似,分别为85%(95%CI:63-95)和84%(95%CI:75-91)。
CE-MRI对头颈部癌患者PNS的检测具有良好的诊断测试准确性。目前的证据表明,与3T MRI相比,1.5T MRI具有更高的敏感性。