Fu Siyun, Lu Zhendong, Wei Song, Chen Zhaoxin, Tang Junfang, Wang Jinghui
Department of Medical Oncology, Beijing Tuberculosis and Thoracic Tumor Research Institute/Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
J Thorac Dis. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):6012-6023. doi: 10.21037/jtd-24-57. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
The standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who encounter progression on initial immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based treatment is uncertain. In the real world, there are various subsequent treatment options, but how to find the most suitable treatment for different patients is still unknown. The present study aimed to explore prognostic factors of subsequent treatment after progression (STAP) (defined as the next treatment after progression from the initial immunotherapy) of initial immunotherapy.
In this retrospective cohort study, NSCLC patients received regimens after progression of initial immunotherapy at Beijing Chest Hospital, Capital Medical University, between March 2016 and May 2023 were retrieved. The major efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), defined as the time from the initiation of next treatment after initial immunotherapy failure to disease progression or death from any cause. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to baseline characteristics, some subsequent regimens beyond progression, etc. for prognostic factors exploration. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for multivariate analysis.
There were 176 patients enrolled. Median age was 64 years. There were 36 (20.5%) females, and 123 (69.9%) were smokers. Adenocarcinoma (99, 56.2%) was the major histological subtype. There were 95 (54.0%) patients with negative expression for programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1). After progressive disease, 92 (52.3%) patients reused ICI-based treatment after progressive disease. Median PFS2 was 3.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.8-4.4]. Longer PFS2 was observed in patients with PD-L1 positive expression [hazard ratio (HR) =0.672, 95% CI: 0.477-0.947, P=0.023] or PFS ≥6 months in initial immunotherapy (HR =0.543, 95% CI: 0.358-0.824, P=0.004). Besides, patients switching to new ICI-based treatments without radiotherapy gained better PFS2 compared with patients receiving prior regimens (P=0.019).
PD-L1 positive expression, and longer PFS in initial immunotherapy would be good prognostic factors for NSCLC patients undergoing STAP on first immunotherapy. Besides, compared with original regimen, changing ICI would prolong PFS2 for NSCLC patients reusing ICI.
接受初始免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗后病情进展的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的标准治疗方案尚不确定。在现实世界中,后续有多种治疗选择,但如何为不同患者找到最合适的治疗方法仍不清楚。本研究旨在探讨初始免疫治疗进展后后续治疗(STAP,定义为从初始免疫治疗进展后的下一次治疗)的预后因素。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,检索了2016年3月至2023年5月期间在首都医科大学附属北京胸科医院接受初始免疫治疗进展后方案的NSCLC患者。主要疗效终点是无进展生存期2(PFS2),定义为从初始免疫治疗失败后开始下一次治疗至疾病进展或因任何原因死亡的时间。根据基线特征、进展后的一些后续方案等进行亚组分析以探索预后因素。采用Cox比例风险模型进行多变量分析。
共纳入176例患者。中位年龄为64岁。女性36例(20.5%),吸烟者123例(69.9%)。腺癌(99例,56.2%)是主要的组织学亚型。程序性细胞死亡配体1(PD-L1)阴性表达的患者有95例(54.0%)。疾病进展后,92例(52.3%)患者在疾病进展后重新使用基于ICI的治疗。中位PFS2为3.6个月[95%置信区间(CI):2.8 - 4.4]。PD-L1阳性表达的患者观察到更长的PFS2[风险比(HR)=0.672,95%CI:0.477 - 0.947,P = 0.023]或初始免疫治疗中PFS≥6个月的患者(HR = 0.543,95%CI:0.358 - 0.824,P = 0.004)。此外,与接受先前方案的患者相比,改用无放疗的新ICI治疗方案的患者获得了更好的PFS2(P = 0.019)。
PD-L1阳性表达以及初始免疫治疗中较长的PFS将是接受首次免疫治疗的NSCLC患者进行STAP的良好预后因素。此外,与原方案相比,更换ICI将延长重新使用ICI的NSCLC患者的PFS2。