Suppr超能文献

淋巴增生性疾病患者的间接血小板放射性抗球蛋白试验

Indirect platelet radioactive antiglobulin test in patients with lymphoproliferative disease.

作者信息

Garvey M B, Freedman J

出版信息

J Lab Clin Med. 1986 Feb;107(2):123-8.

PMID:3944493
Abstract

An indirect platelet radioactive antiglobulin test (PRAT) was used to evaluate serum antiplatelet antibody and complement activation in 114 patients with lymphoproliferative disease. Overall, 60% of serum samples gave a positive indirect PRAT. Positive PRAT was observed in 85% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and megakaryocytic thrombocytopenia, as well as in about half the patients with CLL and a normal platelet count or amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia. In contrast to findings in patients with idiopathic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura or in those with leukemia who were alloimmunized, positive PRAT in patients with lymphoproliferative disease was predominantly caused by C3-only sensitization of platelets. Results were analyzed in relation to other clinical and laboratory findings. There was no significant difference in antiglobulin sensitization pattern between CLL and other lymphomas, different cell type, stage of disease, presence or absence of splenomegaly, recent or distant chemotherapy, sex, or history of pregnancy. Previous transfusion did affect antiglobulin sensitization patterns, as did presence of autoimmune hemolytic anemia. A high frequency of low serum complements (CH50, C3, C4, and factor B) and increased circulating immune complexes was observed; these did not correlate with frequency or sensitization pattern of positive PRAT. Amounts of bound anti-C3 and anti-IgG were significantly higher in patients with lymphoproliferative disease and positive antiglobulin test than in normal individuals; there was, however, no correlation between amount of antiglobulin serum bound and platelet counts. There was an 87% correlation in direct and indirect PRAT in 24 patients tested.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

采用间接血小板放射性抗球蛋白试验(PRAT)对114例淋巴增生性疾病患者的血清抗血小板抗体及补体激活情况进行评估。总体而言,60%的血清样本间接PRAT呈阳性。85%的慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)合并巨核细胞性血小板减少症患者间接PRAT呈阳性,约半数CLL合并血小板计数正常或无巨核细胞性血小板减少症的患者间接PRAT也呈阳性。与特发性自身免疫性血小板减少性紫癜患者或allo免疫的白血病患者的结果不同,淋巴增生性疾病患者间接PRAT阳性主要是由仅C3致敏血小板所致。结合其他临床和实验室检查结果进行分析。CLL与其他淋巴瘤、不同细胞类型、疾病分期、有无脾肿大、近期或远期化疗、性别或妊娠史之间在抗球蛋白致敏模式上无显著差异。既往输血及自身免疫性溶血性贫血的存在确实会影响抗球蛋白致敏模式。观察到低血清补体(CH50、C3、C4和B因子)频率较高且循环免疫复合物增加;这些与间接PRAT阳性频率或致敏模式无关。淋巴增生性疾病且抗球蛋白试验阳性的患者结合的抗C3和抗IgG量显著高于正常个体;然而,抗球蛋白血清结合量与血小板计数之间无相关性。在24例接受检测的患者中,直接和间接PRAT的相关性为87%。(摘要截选至250字)

相似文献

2
Unexplained periparturient thrombocytopenia.不明原因的围产期血小板减少症。
Am J Hematol. 1986 Apr;21(4):397-407. doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830210408.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验