• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向健康城市主义:包容、公平与可持续(THRIVES)——一个从理论到实践的城市设计与规划框架。

Towards healthy urbanism: inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES) - an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis.

作者信息

Pineo Helen

机构信息

Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, Bartlett School of Environment, Energy and Resources, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):974-992. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

DOI:10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527
PMID:39444987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7616730/
Abstract

The globally distributed health impacts of environmental degradation and widening population inequalities require a fundamental shift in understandings of healthy urbanism - including policies and decisions that shape neighbourhood and building design. The built environment tends to disadvantage or exclude women, children, the elderly, disabled, poor and other groups, starting from design and planning stages through to occupation, and this results in avoidable health impacts. Although these concepts are not new, they are rapidly emerging as built environment research and practice priorities without clear understanding of the interconnected aims of healthy environments that are sustainable, equitable and inclusive. This article promotes a new framework - Towards Healthy uRbanism: InclusiVe Equitable Sustainable (THRIVES) - that extends previous conceptualisations and reorients focus towards the existential threat of environmental breakdown and the social injustice created through inequitable and exclusive urban governance and design processes and outcomes. The Framework was developed through synthesising knowledge from research and practice, and by testing this new conceptualisation in a participatory workshop. Ongoing research is exploring implementation of the Framework in practice. If widely adopted, this Framework may contribute towards achieving the goals of sustainable development through a focus on increasing human health and wellbeing in urban development.

摘要

环境退化和日益扩大的人口不平等所产生的全球分布的健康影响,要求对健康城市主义的理解发生根本性转变,包括塑造社区和建筑设计的政策和决策。从设计和规划阶段到居住阶段,建成环境往往使妇女、儿童、老年人、残疾人、贫困人口及其他群体处于不利地位或受到排斥,这导致了可避免的健康影响。尽管这些概念并不新颖,但它们正迅速成为建成环境研究和实践的重点,却没有清晰地理解可持续、公平和包容的健康环境的相互关联目标。本文提出了一个新框架——迈向健康城市主义:包容公平可持续(THRIVES),该框架扩展了先前的概念,并将重点重新定位到环境崩溃的生存威胁以及通过不公平和排他性的城市治理及设计过程与结果所造成的社会不公上。该框架是通过综合研究和实践中的知识,并在一次参与式研讨会上对这一新概念进行测试而制定的。正在进行的研究正在探索该框架在实践中的实施情况。如果得到广泛采用,这一框架可能有助于通过关注城市发展中人类健康和福祉的提升来实现可持续发展目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e5/7616730/95406c41cfff/EMS199292-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e5/7616730/95406c41cfff/EMS199292-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e5/7616730/95406c41cfff/EMS199292-f001.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards healthy urbanism: inclusive, equitable and sustainable (THRIVES) - an urban design and planning framework from theory to praxis.迈向健康城市主义:包容、公平与可持续(THRIVES)——一个从理论到实践的城市设计与规划框架。
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):974-992. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1769527. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
2
Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning.结合从业者的知识来测试和完善健康城市设计与规划的新概念框架。
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):906-921. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1773035. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
3
Urban health: an example of a "health in all policies" approach in the context of SDGs implementation.城市健康:在实现可持续发展目标背景下“所有政策促进健康”方法的一个范例。
Global Health. 2019 Dec 18;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0529-z.
4
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
5
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
6
Using the Doughnut Economics framework to structure whole-system thinking in socioecological wellbeing with multidisciplinary stakeholders: an applied case study in Glasgow, Scotland.运用甜甜圈经济学框架,在具有多学科利益相关者的社会生态福利中构建全系统思维:苏格兰格拉斯哥的一个应用案例研究。
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02057-3.
7
Extending the paradigm: a policy framework for healthy and equitable eating (HE2).拓展模式:健康与公平饮食政策框架(HE2)。
Public Health Nutr. 2018 Dec;21(18):3477-3481. doi: 10.1017/S1368980018002082. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
8
Advancing Health Equity through 15-min Cities and Chrono-urbanism.通过 15 分钟城市和时间城市主义实现健康公平。
J Urban Health. 2024 Jun;101(3):483-496. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00850-2. Epub 2024 May 14.
9
Addressing the social and environmental determinants of urban health equity: evidence for action and a research agenda.解决城市健康公平的社会和环境决定因素:行动证据和研究议程。
J Urban Health. 2011 Oct;88(5):860-74. doi: 10.1007/s11524-011-9606-1.
10
Addressing Inequalities Toward Inclusive Governance for Achieving One Health: A Rapid Review.解决不平等问题以实现包容的治理,实现“同一健康”:快速综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 20;9:755285. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.755285. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring influences of health and wellbeing in Sydney's apartment living: A qualitative study of residents' perceptions.探索悉尼公寓生活中健康与幸福的影响:一项关于居民认知的定性研究
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 6;20(8):e0329879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329879. eCollection 2025.
2
How an urban regeneration programme impact people's health and wellbeing: an evaluation from citizen's perception using concept mapping.城市更新项目如何影响人们的健康和福祉:基于概念映射法的市民认知评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 21;25(1):716. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21827-z.
3
Barriers to integration of health and equity into urban design policies in Regina, Saskatchewan.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating practitioner knowledge to test and improve a new conceptual framework for healthy urban design and planning.结合从业者的知识来测试和完善健康城市设计与规划的新概念框架。
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):906-921. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2020.1773035. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Health equity in England: the Marmot review 10 years on.英国的健康公平:十年后的《马尔莫特审查报告》
BMJ. 2020 Feb 24;368:m693. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m693.
3
Australia: show the world what climate action looks like.澳大利亚:向世界展示气候行动的模样。
将健康与公平纳入萨斯喀彻温省里贾纳市城市设计政策的障碍。
Health Promot Int. 2024 Dec 1;39(6). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae184.
4
Built environment stakeholders' experiences of implementing healthy urban development: an exploratory study.建筑环境利益相关者实施健康城市发展的经验:一项探索性研究。
Cities Health. 2022 Sep 3;6(5):922-936. doi: 10.1080/23748834.2021.1876376. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
Nature. 2020 Jan;577(7791):449-450. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-00152-y.
4
Gentrification, Neighborhood Change, and Population Health: a Systematic Review.绅士化、邻里变化与人口健康:系统评价。
J Urban Health. 2020 Feb;97(1):1-25. doi: 10.1007/s11524-019-00400-1.
5
The well-being profile (WB-Pro): Creating a theoretically based multidimensional measure of well-being to advance theory, research, policy, and practice.健康状况概况(WB-Pro):创建一个基于理论的多维幸福感衡量标准,以推进理论、研究、政策和实践。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Mar;32(3):294-313. doi: 10.1037/pas0000787. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
6
Household air pollution in Nairobi's slums: A long-term policy evaluation using participatory system dynamics.内罗毕贫民窟的家庭空气污染:使用参与式系统动力学进行的长期政策评估。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 10;660:1108-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.430. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
7
Bicycle Facilities Safest from Crime and Crashes: Perceptions of Residents Familiar with Higher Crime/Lower Income Neighborhoods in Boston.自行车设施最安全,免受犯罪和碰撞影响:对熟悉波士顿高犯罪/低收入社区的居民的看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 7;16(3):484. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030484.
8
Built and natural environment planning principles for promoting health: an umbrella review.促进健康的建筑和自然环境规划原则:综述。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Jul 28;18(1):930. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5870-2.
9
Urban Health Indicator Tools of the Physical Environment: a Systematic Review.城市健康指标的物理环境工具:系统评价。
J Urban Health. 2018 Oct;95(5):613-646. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0228-8.
10
Foundational values for public health.公共卫生的基本价值观。
Public Health Rev. 2015 May 29;36:2. doi: 10.1186/s40985-015-0004-1. eCollection 2015.