Suppr超能文献

探索人工智能程序对晶状体、白内障和屈光手术信息的理解。

Exploring Artificial Intelligence Programs' Understanding of Lens, Cataract, and Refractive Surgery Information.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Etlik City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep 13;30(3):173-176. doi: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_199_23. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the success of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT), Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs, which were released free of charge by three different manufacturers, in correctly answering questions about lenses, cataract, and refractive surgery, and to investigate whether they are superior to each other.

METHODS

Seventy questions related to lens, cataract, and refractive surgery were obtained from the study questions section of the American Academy of Ophthalmology 2022 to 2023 Basic and Clinical Science Course Lens and Cataract and Refractive Surgery Books. The questions were asked separately for the ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard artificial intelligence programs. The answers were compared with answer keys and grouped as correct or incorrect. The accuracy rates of artificial intelligence programs were compared statistically.

RESULTS

ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard chatbots gave correct answers to 35 (50%), 43 (61.4%), and 50 (71.4%) questions asked, respectively. The rate of correct answers to the questions of the Bard artificial intelligence program was significantly higher than that of ChatGPT ( = 0.009, Pearson's Chi-square test).

CONCLUSION

Although the currently released artificial intelligence chatbots can be used to access accurate information about lenses, cataracts, and refractive surgery, one should always be careful about the accuracy of the answers given.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估由三家不同制造商免费发布的 Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer(ChatGPT)、Bing 和 Bard 人工智能程序在正确回答有关镜片、白内障和屈光手术的问题方面的成功,并探讨它们之间是否存在优劣之分。

方法

从美国眼科学会 2022 年至 2023 年基础与临床科学课程镜片与白内障及屈光手术书籍的研究问题部分获得了 70 个与镜片、白内障和屈光手术相关的问题。分别向 ChatGPT、Bing 和 Bard 人工智能程序询问这些问题。将答案与答案关键进行比较,并分为正确或错误。统计比较人工智能程序的准确率。

结果

ChatGPT、Bing 和 Bard 聊天机器人分别正确回答了 35(50%)、43(61.4%)和 50(71.4%)个问题。Bard 人工智能程序回答问题的正确答案率明显高于 ChatGPT(=0.009,皮尔逊卡方检验)。

结论

尽管目前发布的人工智能聊天机器人可用于获取有关镜片、白内障和屈光手术的准确信息,但人们始终应注意给出的答案的准确性。

相似文献

6
Evaluation of Current Artificial Intelligence Programs on the Knowledge of Glaucoma.当前人工智能程序对青光眼知识的评估
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2024 Oct;241(10):1140-1144. doi: 10.1055/a-2327-8484. Epub 2024 Jul 24.

本文引用的文献

3
ChatGPT and Lacrimal Drainage Disorders: Performance and Scope of Improvement.ChatGPT 与泪液排出障碍:性能与改善范围。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;39(3):221-225. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002418. Epub 2023 May 10.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验