Suppr超能文献

经微创外科(MIS)行子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫

Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).

机构信息

Department of OB/GYN, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, New York. (Drs. Wang, Uzianbaeva, Hughes, and Mehdizadeh).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Science, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, New York. (Drs. Wang and Mehdizadeh).

出版信息

JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

When the uterus is or more than 18 to 20 weeks in size, laparotomy but not minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is commonly performed for hysterectomy. It is, however, acknowledged that MIS carries numerous benefits to patients compared to laparotomy. The uterine size should therefore not be an excluding factor for MIS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of MIS for hysterectomy for large uterus and explain specific techniques employed.

METHODS

Data from 73 laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy cases were collected. Cases were divided in two groups based on uterine weight (≥500 g vs <500 g). Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of hospital stays, and perioperative complications were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The average specimen weight in two groups was 244 ± 102.75 g vs 903 ± 438.18 g ( < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups. Only 3 patients were hospitalized for more than one day. There were no instances of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion. There was a statistically significant difference in the EBL (78.19 ± 43.8 ml vs 127.88 ± 69.76 ml,  < .01) and operative time (180.68 ± 48.36 vs 228.85 ± 53.04 minutes,  < .01) between the two groups. There were two cases of bladder laceration in the group with uterine weight exceeding 500 g.

CONCLUSION

With advanced surgical skills and the adoption of specific techniques, hysterectomy for large uterus can be performed safely and efficiently by MIS.

摘要

背景与目的

当子宫大小为 18 至 20 周或以上时,通常采用剖腹手术而不是微创手术(MIS)进行子宫切除术。然而,与剖腹手术相比,MIS 确实为患者带来了诸多益处。因此,子宫大小不应成为限制 MIS 的因素。本研究旨在展示对大子宫行 MIS 子宫切除术的可行性和优势,并解释所采用的具体技术。

方法

收集了 73 例腹腔镜和机器人子宫切除术病例的数据。根据子宫重量(≥500 克与<500 克)将病例分为两组。比较两组间估计失血量(EBL)、手术时间、住院时间和围手术期并发症。

结果

两组的平均标本重量分别为 244±102.75 克与 903±438.18 克(<0.01)。两组的住院时间无统计学差异。仅 3 例患者住院时间超过一天。无中转开腹、术中或术后输血的病例。EBL(78.19±43.8 毫升与 127.88±69.76 毫升,<0.01)和手术时间(180.68±48.36 分钟与 228.85±53.04 分钟,<0.01)有统计学差异。子宫重量超过 500 克的一组中有两例膀胱裂伤。

结论

凭借先进的手术技能和采用特定技术,对于大子宫,MIS 子宫切除术可安全、有效地进行。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of a 7400 g Uterus.7400 克子宫的全腹腔镜子宫切除术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):748-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
7
Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends in challenging cases (1995-2018).复杂病例中腹腔镜子宫切除术的趋势(1995 - 2018年)
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):791-798. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验