• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).经微创外科(MIS)行子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫
JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017.
2
Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术治疗子宫重量超过250克患者的围手术期结局
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
3
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
4
Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.与剖腹手术相比,宫颈癌的微创根治性子宫切除术与发病率降低和相似的生存结果相关。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Mar-Apr;24(3):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.12.005. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
5
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗 >1kg 良性子宫疾病的比较:258 例回顾性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing from 1.5 kg to 11.000 kg.对于重量为 1.5 千克至 11.000 千克的子宫,行全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性和安全性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):169-179. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05799-6. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
7
Predictors of Overnight Admission after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in the Expert Setting.专家环境下微创子宫切除术患者当晚住院的预测因素。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019 Jan;26(1):122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.04.019. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
8
Comparison of outcomes of laparotomic and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.比较早期宫颈癌患者行开腹和微创根治性子宫切除术的结局。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2024 Sep;35(5):e60. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e60. Epub 2024 Feb 23.
9
Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.机器人辅助与经腹子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫
JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):400-6. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521755.
10
Laparoscopic, minilaparoscopic, single-port and percutaneous hysterectomy: Comparison of perioperative outcomes of minimally invasive approaches in gynecologic surgery.腹腔镜、迷你腹腔镜、单孔及经皮子宫切除术:妇科手术中微创入路围手术期结局的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Sep;216:125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.026. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

引用本文的文献

1
A Rare Case of Uterine Embryonal Rhabdomyosarcoma.子宫胚胎性横纹肌肉瘤1例罕见病例
CRSLS. 2025 Aug 7;12(3). doi: 10.4293/CRSLS.2025.00033. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Advances and Challenges in Minimally Invasive Myomectomy: A Narrative Review.微创子宫肌瘤切除术的进展与挑战:一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 17;14(12):4313. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124313.

本文引用的文献

1
Uterine Morcellation for Presumed Leiomyomas: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 822: Correction.子宫平滑肌瘤剔除术:美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见,第822号:勘误
Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug 1;138(2):313. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004507.
2
Robotic-Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Indications of Uteri Less Than Fourteen Weeks Size Versus More Than Fourteen Weeks Size: A Comparative Study.机器人辅助子宫切除术治疗孕周小于14周与大于14周子宫良性疾病的比较研究
Cureus. 2021 May 26;13(5):e15263. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15263.
3
The Large Uterus Classification System: a prospective observational study.《大子宫分类系统:一项前瞻性观察研究》。
BJOG. 2021 Aug;128(9):1526-1533. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16753. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
4
Feasibility and safety of total laparoscopic hysterectomy for uteri weighing from 1.5 kg to 11.000 kg.对于重量为 1.5 千克至 11.000 千克的子宫,行全腹腔镜子宫切除术的可行性和安全性。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):169-179. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05799-6. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of a 7400 g Uterus.7400 克子宫的全腹腔镜子宫切除术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):748-749. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 28.
6
In-bag manual versus uncontained power morcellation for laparoscopic myomectomy.腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术中袋内手动粉碎术与无包膜动力粉碎术的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 6;5(5):CD013352. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013352.pub2.
7
Laparoscopic hysterectomy trends in challenging cases (1995-2018).复杂病例中腹腔镜子宫切除术的趋势(1995 - 2018年)
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):791-798. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.06.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
8
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 770 Summary: Uterine Morcellation for Presumed Leiomyomas.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见 No.770 概要:子宫平滑肌瘤切除术。
Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;133(3):604-605. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003127.
9
Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.大型子宫机器人辅助与腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
JSLS. 2019 Jan-Mar;23(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068.
10
Factors for a Successful Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Very Large Uteri.针对非常大子宫进行成功腹腔镜子宫切除术的因素
Case Rep Med. 2017;2017:1637472. doi: 10.1155/2017/1637472. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

经微创外科(MIS)行子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫

Hysterectomy for Large Uterus by Minimally Invasive Surgery (MIS).

机构信息

Department of OB/GYN, BronxCare Health System, Bronx, New York. (Drs. Wang, Uzianbaeva, Hughes, and Mehdizadeh).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Science, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mt Sinai, New York, New York. (Drs. Wang and Mehdizadeh).

出版信息

JSLS. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2024.00017
PMID:39445072
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

When the uterus is or more than 18 to 20 weeks in size, laparotomy but not minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is commonly performed for hysterectomy. It is, however, acknowledged that MIS carries numerous benefits to patients compared to laparotomy. The uterine size should therefore not be an excluding factor for MIS. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility and benefits of MIS for hysterectomy for large uterus and explain specific techniques employed.

METHODS

Data from 73 laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy cases were collected. Cases were divided in two groups based on uterine weight (≥500 g vs <500 g). Estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, length of hospital stays, and perioperative complications were compared between the groups.

RESULTS

The average specimen weight in two groups was 244 ± 102.75 g vs 903 ± 438.18 g ( < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in length of hospital stay between the two groups. Only 3 patients were hospitalized for more than one day. There were no instances of conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative blood transfusion. There was a statistically significant difference in the EBL (78.19 ± 43.8 ml vs 127.88 ± 69.76 ml,  < .01) and operative time (180.68 ± 48.36 vs 228.85 ± 53.04 minutes,  < .01) between the two groups. There were two cases of bladder laceration in the group with uterine weight exceeding 500 g.

CONCLUSION

With advanced surgical skills and the adoption of specific techniques, hysterectomy for large uterus can be performed safely and efficiently by MIS.

摘要

背景与目的

当子宫大小为 18 至 20 周或以上时,通常采用剖腹手术而不是微创手术(MIS)进行子宫切除术。然而,与剖腹手术相比,MIS 确实为患者带来了诸多益处。因此,子宫大小不应成为限制 MIS 的因素。本研究旨在展示对大子宫行 MIS 子宫切除术的可行性和优势,并解释所采用的具体技术。

方法

收集了 73 例腹腔镜和机器人子宫切除术病例的数据。根据子宫重量(≥500 克与<500 克)将病例分为两组。比较两组间估计失血量(EBL)、手术时间、住院时间和围手术期并发症。

结果

两组的平均标本重量分别为 244±102.75 克与 903±438.18 克(<0.01)。两组的住院时间无统计学差异。仅 3 例患者住院时间超过一天。无中转开腹、术中或术后输血的病例。EBL(78.19±43.8 毫升与 127.88±69.76 毫升,<0.01)和手术时间(180.68±48.36 分钟与 228.85±53.04 分钟,<0.01)有统计学差异。子宫重量超过 500 克的一组中有两例膀胱裂伤。

结论

凭借先进的手术技能和采用特定技术,对于大子宫,MIS 子宫切除术可安全、有效地进行。