Gupta Natasha, Mohling Shanti, Mckendrick Rebecca, Elkattah Rayan, Holcombe Jenny, Furr Robert S, Boren Todd, DePasquale Stephen
Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlanger Health System, 979 E. 3rd Street, Suite C720, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and extraction of specimen via mini-laparotomy (RHML) versus open hysterectomy (OH) when uterus weighs more than 250 g. To study the factors determining the length of hospital stay in 2 groups. A retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies performed for uterus weighing more than 250 g from the year 2012 to 2015 was conducted. A total of 140 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery; RHML (n = 82) and OH (n = 58). Mini-laparotomy consisted of a customised incision connecting 2 left lateral port sites for specimen extraction after completing the hysterectomy robotically. Patient factors and perioperative outcomes were compared using Student's t tests and Chi-square analysis. Mean length of stay (RHML = 1.4 days; OH = 3.4 days), estimated blood loss (EBL) (RHML = 119.9 ml; OH = 547.5 ml) and operative time (RHML = 191.5 min; OH = 162.8 min) were significantly different. No significant differences were noted for patient BMI, age, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, pathology of uterus and uterus weight. Postoperative complications were significantly different between two groups (RHML = 6.0%; OH = 15.5%; p = .021). None of the patients stayed less than 24 h in OH group compared to 59.8% patients in RHML group. Type of procedure (p = .004) and EBL (p = .002) significantly predicted the length of stay. Patients undergoing RHML have significantly shorter length of stay, EBL and postoperative complications than OH. The operative time for RHML was longer than OH, but the overall decreased length of stay overcomes this disadvantage. RHML approach retains the benefits of da Vinci, while simultaneously preserving the specimen.
比较子宫重量超过250克的患者接受机器人辅助子宫切除术并经迷你剖腹术取出标本(RHML)与开腹子宫切除术(OH)的围手术期结局。研究两组中决定住院时间长短的因素。对2012年至2015年期间所有因子宫重量超过250克而进行的子宫切除术进行回顾性分析。根据手术类型将140例患者分为两组;RHML组(n = 82)和OH组(n = 58)。迷你剖腹术包括在机器人辅助完成子宫切除术后,通过一个连接两个左侧端口部位的定制切口取出标本。使用学生t检验和卡方分析比较患者因素和围手术期结局。平均住院时间(RHML = 1.4天;OH = 3.4天)、估计失血量(EBL)(RHML = 119.9毫升;OH = 547.5毫升)和手术时间(RHML = 191.5分钟;OH = 162.8分钟)有显著差异。患者的体重指数、年龄、合并症、术中并发症、子宫病理及子宫重量无显著差异。两组术后并发症有显著差异(RHML = 6.0%;OH = 15.5%;p = 0.021)。OH组没有患者住院时间少于24小时,而RHML组有59.8%的患者住院时间少于24小时。手术类型(p = 0.004)和EBL(p = 0.002)显著预测住院时间。接受RHML的患者住院时间、EBL和术后并发症明显短于OH组。RHML的手术时间比OH长,但总体住院时间的减少克服了这一缺点。RHML方法保留了达芬奇手术的优点,同时保留了标本。