• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术治疗子宫重量超过250克患者的围手术期结局

Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.

作者信息

Gupta Natasha, Mohling Shanti, Mckendrick Rebecca, Elkattah Rayan, Holcombe Jenny, Furr Robert S, Boren Todd, DePasquale Stephen

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.

Dept. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erlanger Health System, 979 E. 3rd Street, Suite C720, Chattanooga, TN, 37403, USA.

出版信息

J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7
PMID:29453729
Abstract

To compare perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and extraction of specimen via mini-laparotomy (RHML) versus open hysterectomy (OH) when uterus weighs more than 250 g. To study the factors determining the length of hospital stay in 2 groups. A retrospective analysis of all hysterectomies performed for uterus weighing more than 250 g from the year 2012 to 2015 was conducted. A total of 140 patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of surgery; RHML (n = 82) and OH (n = 58). Mini-laparotomy consisted of a customised incision connecting 2 left lateral port sites for specimen extraction after completing the hysterectomy robotically. Patient factors and perioperative outcomes were compared using Student's t tests and Chi-square analysis. Mean length of stay (RHML = 1.4 days; OH = 3.4 days), estimated blood loss (EBL) (RHML = 119.9 ml; OH = 547.5 ml) and operative time (RHML = 191.5 min; OH = 162.8 min) were significantly different. No significant differences were noted for patient BMI, age, comorbidities, intraoperative complications, pathology of uterus and uterus weight. Postoperative complications were significantly different between two groups (RHML = 6.0%; OH = 15.5%; p = .021). None of the patients stayed less than 24 h in OH group compared to 59.8% patients in RHML group. Type of procedure (p = .004) and EBL (p = .002) significantly predicted the length of stay. Patients undergoing RHML have significantly shorter length of stay, EBL and postoperative complications than OH. The operative time for RHML was longer than OH, but the overall decreased length of stay overcomes this disadvantage. RHML approach retains the benefits of da Vinci, while simultaneously preserving the specimen.

摘要

比较子宫重量超过250克的患者接受机器人辅助子宫切除术并经迷你剖腹术取出标本(RHML)与开腹子宫切除术(OH)的围手术期结局。研究两组中决定住院时间长短的因素。对2012年至2015年期间所有因子宫重量超过250克而进行的子宫切除术进行回顾性分析。根据手术类型将140例患者分为两组;RHML组(n = 82)和OH组(n = 58)。迷你剖腹术包括在机器人辅助完成子宫切除术后,通过一个连接两个左侧端口部位的定制切口取出标本。使用学生t检验和卡方分析比较患者因素和围手术期结局。平均住院时间(RHML = 1.4天;OH = 3.4天)、估计失血量(EBL)(RHML = 119.9毫升;OH = 547.5毫升)和手术时间(RHML = 191.5分钟;OH = 162.8分钟)有显著差异。患者的体重指数、年龄、合并症、术中并发症、子宫病理及子宫重量无显著差异。两组术后并发症有显著差异(RHML = 6.0%;OH = 15.5%;p = 0.021)。OH组没有患者住院时间少于24小时,而RHML组有59.8%的患者住院时间少于24小时。手术类型(p = 0.004)和EBL(p = 0.002)显著预测住院时间。接受RHML的患者住院时间、EBL和术后并发症明显短于OH组。RHML的手术时间比OH长,但总体住院时间的减少克服了这一缺点。RHML方法保留了达芬奇手术的优点,同时保留了标本。

相似文献

1
Perioperative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy with mini-laparotomy versus open hysterectomy for uterus weighing more than 250 g.机器人辅助腹腔镜下子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术治疗子宫重量超过250克患者的围手术期结局
J Robot Surg. 2018 Dec;12(4):641-645. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0792-7. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Robotic versus abdominal hysterectomy for very large uteri.机器人辅助与经腹子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫
JSLS. 2013 Jul-Sep;17(3):400-6. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422521755.
3
Comparison of cost and operative outcomes of robotic hysterectomy compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy across different uterine weights.不同子宫重量下机器人辅助子宫切除术与腹腔镜子宫切除术的成本及手术结果比较
J Robot Surg. 2017 Dec;11(4):433-439. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0674-4. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
4
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Uteri Weighing >1 kg: A Retrospective Analysis on 258 Patients.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗 >1kg 良性子宫疾病的比较:258 例回顾性分析。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):62-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
Comparative safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术与传统腹腔镜手术及剖腹手术治疗子宫内膜癌的比较安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;42(9):1303-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.06.400. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
6
Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.与传统腹腔镜手术和开腹手术相比,机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的手术及临床安全性和有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;43(6):994-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
7
Laparoscopic Versus Open Hysterectomy for Benign Disease in Women with Giant Uteri (≥1500 g): Feasibility and Outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术治疗巨大子宫(≥1500克)女性良性疾病的可行性及结局
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Sep-Oct;23(6):922-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 17.
8
A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.一项关于机器人辅助与开放手术子宫切除术及盆腔淋巴结清扫术治疗子宫内膜癌的前瞻性比较研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Feb;25(2):250-6. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000357.
9
Single-port hysterectomy: robotic versus laparoscopic.单孔腹腔镜子宫切除术:机器人手术与传统腹腔镜手术对比
J Robot Surg. 2018 Mar;12(1):87-92. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0699-8. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Surgical and oncologic outcomes after robotic radical hysterectomy as compared to open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early cervical cancer.与开放性根治性子宫切除术相比,机器人根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌后的手术及肿瘤学结局。
J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e82. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e82.

本文引用的文献

1
Contained Morcellation: Review of Current Methods and Future Directions.包含式肌瘤粉碎术:当前方法与未来方向综述
Front Surg. 2017 Mar 14;4:15. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00015. eCollection 2017.
2
Trends in Use and Outcomes of Women Undergoing Hysterectomy With Electric Power Morcellation.接受电动旋切术子宫切除术的女性的使用趋势和结局
JAMA. 2016;316(8):877-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.9432.
3
Laparoscopic power morcellation of presumed fibroids.腹腔镜下对疑似子宫肌瘤进行动力粉碎术。
Minerva Ginecol. 2016 Jun;68(3):352-63. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
4
Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids Within a Containment System and Without Power Morcellation.在封闭系统内且不使用动力粉碎器的子宫肌瘤手术治疗
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;59(1):85-92. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000168.
5
Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.美国食品药品监督管理局的碎宫术警告与微创子宫切除术和子宫肌瘤切除术发生率的关联
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):1174-1180. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001111.
6
Techniques for contained morcellation in gynecologic surgery.妇科手术中封闭切割的技术。
Fertil Steril. 2015 Apr;103(4):e34. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.01.022. Epub 2015 Feb 21.
7
Intracorporeal electromechanical tissue morcellation: a critical review and recommendations for clinical practice.体内电动机械组织粉碎术:临床实践的批判性综述与建议
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):787-793. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000448.
8
Uterine morcellation at the time of hysterectomy: techniques, risks, and recommendations.子宫切除术时的子宫粉碎术:技术、风险及建议。
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2014 Jul;69(7):415-25. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000088.
9
Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.机器人与开放手术分期治疗子宫内膜癌 155 例与 150 例比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Feb;124(2):260-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.09.038. Epub 2011 Oct 29.
10
Meta-analysis of observational studies on the safety and effectiveness of robotic gynaecological surgery.观察性研究的荟萃分析:机器人妇科手术的安全性和有效性。
Br J Surg. 2010 Dec;97(12):1772-83. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7269.