• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

局限期小细胞肺癌的预后因素:CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538 的二次分析。

Prognostic Factors in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest Medical University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

Department of Radiation Oncology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440673. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40673.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40673
PMID:39446327
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581554/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The impact of patient-specific, disease-related, and social factors on outcomes in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is not well defined. A post hoc secondary analysis of such factors from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 30610-Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0538 trial may impact future trial design.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comprehensive demographic, disease-related, treatment-related, and social factors for potential associations with survival outcomes and understand whether specific subpopulations may benefit from radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation in LS-SCLC.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This post hoc secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial included 638 adults with LS-SCLC treated at 186 unique treatment sites with at least 1 accrual for all patients from March 15, 2008, to December 1, 2019; 313 patients were randomized to receive RT twice daily to a dosage of 45 Gy for 3 weeks and 325 to receive RT once daily to a dosage of 70 Gy for 7 weeks. Data were locked February 28, 2022, and analyzed from November 28, 2022, to June 4, 2024.

INTERVENTIONS

Twice-daily RT or once-daily RT.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the association of treatment groups and other risk factors with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Patient-specific factors included age, sex, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Disease-related factors included tumor, nodal, and overall cancer stages. Treatment-related factors included type of chemotherapy, timing of concurrent RT, RT technique, and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Social factors included marital status and treatment center accrual volume.

RESULTS

Among 507 patients (260 [51.3%] female and 247 [48.7%] male; mean [SD] age, 62.6 [7.9] years) included in the multivariate survival analysis, with a median follow-up of 4.7 (IQR, 3.7-7.1) years, female sex was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.58-0.91]; P = .006), while being 70 years or older was associated with decreased OS (HR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.14-1.98]; P = .004). Neither age nor sex was associated with PFS. When compared with those with N1 disease, OS and PFS were worse in patients with N2 (HRs, 1.64 [95% CI, 1.19-2.26]; P = .002 and 1.36 [95% CI, 1.02-1.81]; P = .04, respectively) and N3 (HRs, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.40-2.93]; P < .001 and 1.63 [95% CI, 1.17-2.26]; P = .004) disease. Compared with stage II cancer, OS was worse for stage IIIA (HR, 1.65 [95% CI, 1.17-2.31]; P = .004) and stage IIIB (HR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.34-2.83]; P < .001). Compared with high-volume accrual centers, treatment at low- or middle-volume accrual centers was associated with worse PFS (HRs, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.33-2.82; P < .001] and 1.44 [95% CI, 1.15-1.82; P = .002], respectively) and worse OS (HRs, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.03-2.32; P = .03] and 1.33 [95% CI, 1.04-1.70; P = .02], respectively).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This secondary analysis of the CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538 randomized clinical trial of patients with LS-SCLC found associations between female sex or being younger than 70 years and improved overall survival and between advanced nodal stage or treatment at low- or middle-volume accrual centers and worse outcomes. These findings suggest that stratification by nodal stage, clinical stage, and age should be considered in future randomized trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00632853.

摘要

重要性

患者特异性、疾病相关和社会因素对局限期小细胞肺癌(LS-SCLC)患者的预后的影响尚未明确。对癌症和白血病组 B(CALGB)30610-放射治疗肿瘤组(RTOG)0538 试验中这些因素的事后二次分析可能会影响未来的试验设计。

目的

评估与生存结果相关的综合人口统计学、疾病相关、治疗相关和社会因素,并了解特定亚组患者是否可能从 LS-SCLC 的放疗(RT)剂量递增中获益。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项对随机临床试验的事后二次分析,共纳入 186 个治疗场所的 638 名 LS-SCLC 成年患者,所有患者至少有 1 名入组,入组时间为 2008 年 3 月 15 日至 2019 年 12 月 1 日;313 名患者随机接受每日两次 RT,剂量为 45 Gy,共 3 周;325 名患者接受每日一次 RT,剂量为 70 Gy,共 7 周。数据锁定日期为 2022 年 2 月 28 日,分析日期为 2024 年 6 月 4 日至 2024 年 6 月 4 日。

干预措施

每日两次 RT 或每日一次 RT。

主要观察指标和测量方法

多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估了治疗组和其他风险因素与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的关系。患者特异性因素包括年龄、性别和东部肿瘤协作组表现状态。疾病相关因素包括肿瘤、淋巴结和癌症总体分期。治疗相关因素包括化疗类型、同期 RT 的时机、RT 技术和预防性颅脑照射。社会因素包括婚姻状况和治疗中心入组量。

结果

在纳入多变量生存分析的 507 名患者(260 名女性[51.3%]和 247 名男性[48.7%];平均[SD]年龄为 62.6[7.9]岁)中,中位随访时间为 4.7(IQR,3.7-7.1)年,女性与 OS 改善相关(风险比[HR],0.73[95%CI,0.58-0.91];P=0.006),而 70 岁或以上与 OS 降低相关(HR,1.50[95%CI,1.14-1.98];P=0.004)。年龄和性别均与 PFS 无关。与 N1 疾病相比,N2(HR,1.64[95%CI,1.19-2.26];P=0.002)和 N3(HR,2.03[95%CI,1.40-2.93];P<0.001)疾病患者的 OS 和 PFS 更差,而 N3(HR,1.63[95%CI,1.02-1.81];P=0.04)疾病患者的 OS 和 PFS 更差。与 II 期癌症相比,III A 期(HR,1.65[95%CI,1.17-2.31];P=0.004)和 III B 期(HR,1.94[95%CI,1.34-2.83];P<0.001)癌症患者的 OS 更差。与高容量入组中心相比,低容量或中容量入组中心治疗与较差的 PFS(HRs,1.94[95%CI,1.33-2.82;P<0.001]和 1.44[95%CI,1.15-1.82;P=0.002])和较差的 OS(HRs,1.55[95%CI,1.03-2.32;P=0.03]和 1.33[95%CI,1.04-1.70;P=0.02])相关。

结论和相关性

对 LS-SCLC 患者的 CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538 随机临床试验的二次分析发现,女性或年龄小于 70 岁与总体生存改善相关,而淋巴结分期较晚或在低或中容量入组中心治疗与预后较差相关。这些发现表明,在未来的随机试验中,应考虑按淋巴结分期、临床分期和年龄进行分层。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT00632853。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/557ee6ce58c1/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/2814f9a6fad6/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/ab4f2375b91a/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/557ee6ce58c1/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/2814f9a6fad6/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/ab4f2375b91a/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7a3/11581554/557ee6ce58c1/jamanetwopen-e2440673-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic Factors in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538.局限期小细胞肺癌的预后因素:CALGB 30610-RTOG 0538 的二次分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2440673. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40673.
2
Optimisation of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for untreated Hodgkin lymphoma patients with respect to second malignant neoplasms, overall and progression-free survival: individual participant data analysis.未治疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗和放疗在第二原发性恶性肿瘤、总生存期和无进展生存期方面的优化:个体参与者数据分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 13;9(9):CD008814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008814.pub2.
3
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
4
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
5
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
6
Treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in the elderly: a network meta-analysis.老年新诊断胶质母细胞瘤的治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 23;3(3):CD013261. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013261.pub2.
7
A simplified scoring system for predicting treatment response in limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (EAST score).一种用于预测局限期小细胞肺癌治疗反应的简化评分系统(EAST评分)。
Future Oncol. 2025 Feb;21(4):473-481. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2444858. Epub 2024 Dec 29.
8
Comparison of first-line chemotherapy including escalated BEACOPP versus chemotherapy including ABVD for people with early unfavourable or advanced stage Hodgkin lymphoma.对早期预后不良或晚期霍奇金淋巴瘤患者,比较包括强化BEACOPP方案的一线化疗与包括ABVD方案的化疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD007941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007941.pub3.
9
Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy as a First-Line Therapy for Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Phase 3 EXTENTORCH Randomized Clinical Trial.托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌的一线治疗:3期EXTENTORCH随机临床试验
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Jan 1;11(1):16-25. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5019.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic Role of the Naples Score in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Missed Opportunity in Inflammation-Based Stratification.那不勒斯评分在广泛期小细胞肺癌中的预后作用:基于炎症分层的一个错失的机会。
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5892. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165892.
2
Case Report: Proximal bronchial injury in small-cell lung cancer patient after moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy.病例报告:小细胞肺癌患者在中度低分割放疗后出现近端支气管损伤。
Front Oncol. 2025 May 19;15:1566693. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1566693. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Bridging the Communication Gaps: A Prospective Single-Arm Pilot Study Testing the Feasibility of Interdisciplinary Radiotherapy Planning in Locally Advanced Lung Cancer.弥合沟通差距:一项前瞻性单臂试验研究,测试局部晚期肺癌中跨学科放射治疗计划的可行性。
Acad Radiol. 2023 Nov;30(11):2566-2573. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.019. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
2
High-Dose Once-Daily Thoracic Radiotherapy in Limited-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: CALGB 30610 (Alliance)/RTOG 0538.局限期小细胞肺癌高剂量每日一次胸部放疗:CALGB 30610(Alliance)/RTOG 0538。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 May 1;41(13):2394-2402. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01359. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
High-dose versus standard-dose twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer: an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial.
大剂量与标准剂量每日 2 次胸部放疗治疗局限期小细胞肺癌患者:一项开放标签、随机、2 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):321-331. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30742-7.
4
Long-Term Results of NRG Oncology RTOG 0617: Standard- Versus High-Dose Chemoradiotherapy With or Without Cetuximab for Unresectable Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.NRG肿瘤学RTOG 0617的长期结果:不可切除的III期非小细胞肺癌采用标准剂量与高剂量放化疗联合或不联合西妥昔单抗的疗效对比
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Mar 1;38(7):706-714. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01162. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
5
Dedicated Diagnostic Radiology/Radiation Oncology Rounds: Added Value Beyond Traditional Tumor Boards.专门的诊断放射学/放射肿瘤学查房:超越传统肿瘤委员会的附加价值。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020 Jul-Aug;49(4):248-253. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 May 9.
6
Association of Chemoradiotherapy With Outcomes Among Patients With Stage I to II vs Stage III Small Cell Lung Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.放化疗与局限期与广泛期小细胞肺癌患者结局的相关性:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):e185335. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5335. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
7
Compliance and Outcome of Elderly Patients Treated in the Concurrent Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Radiotherapy (CONVERT) Trial.接受每日一次与每日两次放疗的老年患者的依从性和结局:CONVERT 试验。
J Thorac Oncol. 2019 Jan;14(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
8
Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial.局限期小细胞肺癌患者同步每日一次与每日两次放化疗的比较(CONVERT):一项开放标签、3期、随机、优效性试验
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Aug;18(8):1116-1125. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30318-2. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
9
Institutional Enrollment and Survival Among NSCLC Patients Receiving Chemoradiation: NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0617.接受放化疗的非小细胞肺癌患者的机构登记与生存情况:NRG肿瘤学放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG)0617研究
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 May 19;108(9). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw034. Print 2016 Sep.
10
Utilization of Hyperfractionated Radiation in Small-Cell Lung Cancer and Its Impact on Survival.超分割放射治疗在小细胞肺癌中的应用及其对生存的影响。
J Thorac Oncol. 2015 Dec;10(12):1770-5. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0000000000000672.