College of Optometry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States.
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024 Oct 1;65(12):36. doi: 10.1167/iovs.65.12.36.
Binocular depth discrimination in the near distance range (< 2 m) improves with stimulus duration. However, whether the same response-pattern holds in the intermediate distance range (approximately 2-25 m) remains unknown because the spatial coding mechanisms are thought to be different.
We used the two-interval forced choice procedure to measure absolute depth discrimination of paired asynchronous targets (3, 6, or 16 arc min). The paired targets (0.2 degrees) were located over a distance and height range, respectively, of 4.5 to 7.0 m and 0.15 to 0.7 m. Experiment 1 estimated duration thresholds for binocular depth discrimination at varying target durations (40-1610 ms), in the presence of a 2 × 6 array of parallel texture-elements spanning 1.5 × 5.83 m on the floor. The texture-elements provided a visible background in the light-tight room (9 × 3 m). Experiment 2 used a similar setup to control for viewing conditions: binocular versus monocular and with versus without texture background. Experiment 3 compared binocular depth discrimination between brief (40, 80, and 125 ms) and continuous texture background presentation.
Stimulus duration threshold for depth discrimination decreased with increasing disparity in experiment 1. Experiment 2 revealed depth discrimination performance with texture background was near chance level with monocular viewing. Performance with binocular viewing degraded without texture background. Experiment 3 showed continuous texture background presentation enhances binocular depth discrimination.
Absolute depth discrimination improves with target duration, binocular viewing, and texture background. Performance further improved with longer background duration underscoring the role of ground surface representation in spatial coding.
在近距离(<2 米)范围内,双眼深度辨别能力随着刺激持续时间的延长而提高。然而,在中距离范围(约 2-25 米)内是否存在相同的反应模式尚不清楚,因为人们认为空间编码机制是不同的。
我们使用两间隔强制选择程序来测量配对异步目标(3、6 或 16 弧分)的绝对深度辨别。配对目标(0.2 度)分别位于 4.5 至 7.0 米和 0.15 至 0.7 米的距离和高度范围内。实验 1 在不同的目标持续时间(40-1610 毫秒)下,估计了双眼深度辨别阈值,同时在地板上的一个 2x6 阵列的平行纹理元素的存在下,该阵列跨越 1.5x5.83 米。纹理元素在光线密闭的房间(9x3 米)中提供了可见的背景。实验 2 使用类似的设置来控制观看条件:双眼与单眼以及有无纹理背景。实验 3 比较了短暂(40、80 和 125 毫秒)和连续纹理背景呈现之间的双眼深度辨别。
实验 1 中,随着视差的增加,深度辨别刺激持续时间的阈值降低。实验 2 表明,在单眼观察时,具有纹理背景的深度辨别性能接近机会水平。在没有纹理背景的情况下,双眼观察的性能会下降。实验 3 表明,连续的纹理背景呈现增强了双眼深度辨别。
绝对深度辨别随着目标持续时间、双眼观察和纹理背景的增加而提高。在背景持续时间较长的情况下,性能进一步提高,突出了地面表面表示在空间编码中的作用。