• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威初级保健中处于风险中或患有 2 型糖尿病的人群的健康素养:一项横断面研究。

Health literacy among people at risk or with type 2 diabetes in Norwegian primary care-A cross sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312485. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312485
PMID:39446869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11500926/
Abstract

AIMS

This study aims to describe health literacy for people at risk of type 2 diabetes and people with type 2 diabetes using the HLS-EU-Q12, and further examine the association between sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, well-being, overall health and quality of life, and health literacy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional study among 142 people at risk of type 2 diabetes and 75 people with type 2 diabetes from four primary care clinics in Norway. These data are baseline data from a randomized controlled trial which seeks to evaluate an interprofessional follow-up intervention. Multiple regression analysis was applied to explore associations to health literacy.

RESULTS

Inadequate health literacy (sum score <33) was found among 30.2% of people at risk of type 2 diabetes and among 25.7% of people with type 2 diabetes. For people at risk of type 2 diabetes, higher level of education was significantly associated with higher health literacy. Better well-being and quality of life was significantly associated with higher health literacy for both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary health care services should pay greater attention to assessing HL, well-being, and quality of life to facilitate the identification of people at risk of type 2 diabetes with insufficient self- management strategies to prevent or delay the development of manifest disease and its complications.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在使用 HLS-EU-Q12 描述 2 型糖尿病风险人群和 2 型糖尿病患者的健康素养,并进一步探讨社会人口学和临床特征、幸福感、整体健康和生活质量与健康素养之间的关系。

材料和方法

我们在挪威的四个初级保健诊所对 142 名 2 型糖尿病风险人群和 75 名 2 型糖尿病患者进行了横断面研究。这些数据是一项旨在评估多专业随访干预的随机对照试验的基线数据。应用多元回归分析探讨与健康素养的关联。

结果

2 型糖尿病风险人群中,健康素养不足(总分<33)的比例为 30.2%,2 型糖尿病患者中为 25.7%。对于 2 型糖尿病风险人群,较高的教育水平与较高的健康素养显著相关。对于两个群体,更好的幸福感和生活质量与更高的健康素养显著相关。

结论

初级保健服务应更加关注评估 HL、幸福感和生活质量,以帮助识别健康素养不足、自我管理策略不足的 2 型糖尿病风险人群,从而预防或延迟显性疾病及其并发症的发生。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a09/11500926/00d109038213/pone.0312485.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a09/11500926/7a7d6070e0d6/pone.0312485.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a09/11500926/00d109038213/pone.0312485.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a09/11500926/7a7d6070e0d6/pone.0312485.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a09/11500926/00d109038213/pone.0312485.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Health literacy among people at risk or with type 2 diabetes in Norwegian primary care-A cross sectional study.挪威初级保健中处于风险中或患有 2 型糖尿病的人群的健康素养:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0312485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312485. eCollection 2024.
2
Explaining variance in health literacy among people with type 2 diabetes: the association between health literacy and health behaviour and empowerment.解释 2 型糖尿病患者健康素养的差异:健康素养与健康行为和赋权之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Feb 3;20(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-8274-z.
3
Low health literacy is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany.低健康素养与 2 型糖尿病风险增加相关:德国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10508-2.
4
Predictors of Inadequate Health Literacy among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Assessment with Different Self-Reported Instruments.2 型糖尿病患者健康素养不足的预测因素:使用不同自我报告工具进行评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 15;20(6):5190. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20065190.
5
Impact of health literacy and self-care behaviors on health-related quality of life in Iranians with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.健康素养和自我护理行为对 2 型糖尿病伊朗患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 4;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01613-8.
6
Serial mediation roles of empowerment and self-care activities connecting health literacy, quality of life, and glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes.授权和自我保健活动在连接 2 型糖尿病患者的健康素养、生活质量和血糖控制方面的连续中介作用。
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2024 Jun;21(3):330-337. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12684. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Relationships between health literacy, motivation and diet and physical activity in people with type 2 diabetes participating in peer-led support groups.参与同伴主导支持小组的2型糖尿病患者的健康素养、动机与饮食及身体活动之间的关系。
Prim Care Diabetes. 2018 Aug;12(4):331-337. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
8
Health literacy and diabetes self-care in individuals with type 2 diabetes in Turkey.土耳其2型糖尿病患者的健康素养与糖尿病自我管理
Prim Care Diabetes. 2021 Feb;15(1):74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2020.06.009. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
9
Health Literacy and Adherence to Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portugal.健康素养与 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗依从性:葡萄牙的一项横断面研究。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2024 Oct;8(4):e194-e203. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20240625-01. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
10
Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.建立欧洲健康素养调查问卷的HLS-Q12简版:应用拉施模型和验证性因素分析的潜在特质分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):506. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3275-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Making prediabetes visible in primary health care: a qualitative study of health care professionals' perspectives.将前驱糖尿病纳入初级卫生保健中:卫生保健专业人员观点的定性研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Dec 13;24(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02230-2.
2
Prevalence of increased risk of type 2 diabetes in general practice: a cross-sectional study in Norway.一般实践中 2 型糖尿病风险增加的流行率:挪威的一项横断面研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Jul 20;24(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02100-x.
3
The evaluation of the role of diabetes health literacy and health locus of control on quality of life among type 2 diabetes using the Path analysis.
采用路径分析评估 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病健康素养和健康控制源对生活质量的作用。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 3;13(1):5447. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32348-3.
4
The experiences of people with overweight in GP consultations - a qualitative study.全科医生诊疗中超重人群的经历——一项定性研究
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2023 Feb 7;143(3). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.22.0528. Print 2023 Feb 21.
5
Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2022. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).2022 年美国糖尿病协会 (ADA) 和欧洲糖尿病研究协会 (EASD) 共识报告:2 型糖尿病患者高血糖管理。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Nov 1;45(11):2753-2786. doi: 10.2337/dci22-0034.
6
Low health literacy is associated with higher risk of type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany.低健康素养与 2 型糖尿病风险增加相关:德国的一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;21(1):510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-10508-2.
7
Validation of the WHOQOL-Bref: psychometric properties and normative data for the Norwegian general population.WHOQOL-Bref 的验证:挪威普通人群的心理测量特性和常模数据。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021 Jan 7;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01656-x.
8
[How many people have diabetes in Norway in 2020?].2020年挪威有多少人患有糖尿病?
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2020 Nov 12;140(17). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.20.0849. Print 2020 Nov 24.
9
Impact of health literacy and self-care behaviors on health-related quality of life in Iranians with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.健康素养和自我护理行为对 2 型糖尿病伊朗患者健康相关生活质量的影响:一项横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Nov 4;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01613-8.
10
Health Literacy and Health Behaviors Among Adults With Prediabetes, 2016 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.健康素养与糖尿病前期成年人的健康行为,2016 年行为风险因素监测系统。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(4):492-500. doi: 10.1177/0033354920927848. Epub 2020 Jun 8.